The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.
Abstract
Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP), an index of data overlap between phases in single-case research, is demonstrated and field tested with 200 published AB contrasts. NAP is a novel application of an established effect size known in various forms as Area Under the Curve (AUC), the Common Language Effect Size (CL), the Probability of Superiority (PS), the Dominance Statistic (DS), Mann-Whitney's U, and Sommers D, among others. NAP was compared with 3 other non-overlap-based indices: PND (percent of nonoverlapping data), PEM (percent of data points exceeding the median), and PAND (percent of all nonoverlapping data), as well as Pearson's R(2). Five questions were addressed about NAP: (a) typical NAP values, (b) its ability to discriminate among typical single-case research results, (c) its power and precision (confidence interval width), (d) its correlation with the established effect size index, R(2), and (e) its relationship with visual judgments. Results were positive, the new index equaling or outperforming the other overlap indices on most criteria.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the effect sizes found in SCED studies are usually higher than those found in group designs such as randomized controlled trials (Parker and Vannest, 2009; Shadish et al., 2016).”
From A Multiple-Baseline Evaluation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Focused on Repetitive Negative Thinking for Comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depression (2020) · cites this paper as Parker and Vannest, 2009
In the citing paper
“Parker and Vannest (2009) proposed the following ranges in order to interpret NAP; scores ranging from 0 to 0.65 are weak effects, from 0.66 to 0.92 are medium effects, and from 0.93 to 1.0 are large or strong effects.”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for individuals with depressive and anxiety symptoms following acquired brain injury: A non-concurrent multiple baseline design across four cases. (2023) · cites this paper as Parker and Vannest (2009)
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Practical Nonparametric Statistics
Groggel, D. J., & Conover, W. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271101 · Cited by 11,076
The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290507100203 · Cited by 3,368
Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances
Brown, M. B., & Forsythe, A. B. (1974) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10482955 · Cited by 3,216
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Graphical Methods for Data Analysis.
Healy, M. J. R., Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., & Tukey, P. A. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981587 · Cited by 2,315
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Newson, R. B., 2000. snp15.1: Update to somersd. Stata Technical Bulletin 57: 35. In Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 10, 322–323. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
Svanberg, M., Johansson, A., & Boersma, K. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2018-0051 · Cited by 4
Effects of a Paraphrasing Strategy on the Text Comprehension of Fourth-Grade Striving Readers
Washburn, E. K., Abdullah, S., & Mulcahy, C. A. (2021) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/714035 · Cited by 4
“NAP represents the percentage of nonoverlapping data between baseline and intervention phases (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMoeyaert, M., & Fingerhut, J. E. (2022) · Harvard data science review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.3574f1dc · Cited by 4
“The nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; (Parker & Vannest, 2009)) is another measure that was developed for used with personalized trials.”
Wendt, O., & Boesch, M. C. (2010) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489531003771753 · Cited by 4
“Better options include the Improvement Rate Difference (Parker, Vannest, & Brown, 2009) or the Non-overlap of All Pairs Index (Parker & Vannest, 2009), which were not available at the time Preston and Carter conducted their review.”
MethodBehavior Interventions in the Restroom: Flushing Away Noise
Pasqua, J. L., Dart, E. H., & Radley, K. C. (2016) · Journal of Applied School Psychology · doi:10.1080/15377903.2016.1183544 · Cited by 4
“Interpretations of NAP results are as follows: weak effects: 0 to .65;medium effects: .66 to .92; large or strong effects: .93 to 1.0” (Parker and Vannest 2009, p. 364).”
BackgroundInfluentialBoisvert, M. (2019) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/h5k7-bw26 · Cited by 4
Baixauli, I., Gascón, N., Isla, M. D. C., & Diago, C. C. (2018) · Revista de Neurología · doi:10.33588/rn.66s01.2017533 · Cited by 4
Waddington, H. L. (2018) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17068478.v1 · Cited by 4
Patel, M. R., Andersen, A. S., & Patel, V. Y. (2024) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-024-09980-6 · Cited by 3
“Nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) was calculated to compare the degree of overlap between each data point in baseline and treatment.”
Holyfield, C., Pope, L. E., Semmler, B. J. F., DeLuca, T., Zimmerman, B., Jakobs, E., & Light, J. (2025) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549507.2025.2499504 · Cited by 3
“The effect size estimation used was nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) because it is a precise measure that relates strongly to visual analysis and is commonly used in AAC single case research.”
InfluentialKing, S. A., Rodgers, D. B., & Enders, O. G. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-025-09595-7 · Cited by 3
“A conventional nonparametric measure of change between baseline and intervention conditions often accompanying visual analysis (Manolov & Tanious, 2024), NAP estimates nonoverlap between phases, with values ranging from 0 to 1.00 (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialCarrington, S. C., Turner, M. J., North, J. S., Brady, A., & Martin, E. A. (2025) · Performance Enhancement & Health · doi:10.1016/j.peh.2025.100379 · Cited by 3
Hamstring injury risk in male professional football: do external training loads play a role?
Nilsson, T., Fransson, D., Börjesson, M., Lundblad, M., & Ivarsson, A. (2025) · BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002649 · Cited by 3
“29 This study, based on the recommendations by Parker and Vannest, 29 used the following benchmarks to interpret the results; 0–0.07 (strong effect in favour of sequence A), 0.08–0.34 (moderate effect in favour of sequence A), 0.35–0.65 (no systematic effect for any of the sequences), 0.66–0.92…”
InfluentialAssessment and treatment of pica: A consecutive controlled case series study
Frank‐Crawford, M. A., Hagopian, L. P., Scheithauer, M. C., McMahon, M. X. H., Argueta, T., Call, N. A., & Schmidt, J. D. (2025) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.70035 · Cited by 3
A Meta-analysis of PECS Interventions Using the Improvement Rate Difference
양현규, & Park, W.-H. (2012) · The Journal of Special Children Education · doi:10.21075/kacsn.2012.14.2.73 · Cited by 3
A Systematic Literature Review of Group Contingencies Within General Education Classrooms
Beaver, B. N., Ré, T. C., Griffith, A. K., Zhang, D., & Schoener, M. A. (2023) · Contemporary School Psychology · doi:10.1007/s40688-023-00448-6 · Cited by 3
“Scores between 0 and 0.65 are considered weak effects, scores of 0.66–0.92 are considered moderate effects, and scores of 0.93–1.0 are considered strong effects (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialDrevon, D. D., Peart, A. M., & Koval, E. T. (2023) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2023.2273822 · Cited by 3
“In this example, the NAP values based on the actual and extracted data would be interpreted as medium and large, respectively, based on tentative interpretive benchmarks proffered by Parker and Vannest (2009).”
Roberts, G. J., Capin, P., Handy, A., Coté, B., & Jimenez, Z. (2024) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194241263649 · Cited by 3
“To measure the extent to which data overlapped across phases, we calculated two non-overlap effect sizes: non-overlap of all pairs (NAPs; Parker & Vannest, 2009) and Tau-U (Parker et al., 2011).”
Yakubova, G., Defayette, M. A., Gupta, S., Proulx, A. L., & Lee, Y. (2024) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434241277188 · Cited by 3
“The NAP scores were interpreted using Parker and Vannest (2009) guidelines as the intervention having weak effects (0 – 0.65), medium effects (0.66 – 0.92) and large or strong effects (0.93 – 1.0).”
InfluentialEffect of Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Sprint Acceleration: A Multiple N-of-1 Trial
Bernuz, B., Laujac, S., Sirial, C., Auffret, S., Preda, C., SLAWINSKI, J. S., Millot, B., Pradon, D., Coudrat, L., & Gavarry, O. (2024) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-024-00758-w · Cited by 3
“The non-overlap of all pairs (NAP) index [34] was used as the measure of the effect size, with values ranging as follows: small effect (0.5–0.66), medium effect (0.67–0.92), and large effect ( ≥ 0.93).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialQuinn, E. D., Kurin, K., Cook, A., & Kaiser, A. P. (2024) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2024_ajslp-23-00454 · Cited by 3
Holyfield, C., Zimmerman, T. O., MacNeil, S., Caldwell, N., Patel, P. J., Griffen, B., Lorah, E. R., Dragut, E. C., & Vučetić, S. (2024) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000542304 · Cited by 3
Seçer, İ., Ulaş, S., Tatlı, E., Çi̇men, F., Bülbül, B., & Tosunoğlu, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1408847 · Cited by 8
Kurnaz, E. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15030272 · Cited by 3
“This choice aligns effectively with the graphical analyses commonly utilized in single-subject research (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
Suvarna, V., Farrell, L. J., Adams, D., Emerson, L., & Paynter, J. M. (2025) · Clinical Psychologist · doi:10.1080/13284207.2025.2498396 · Cited by 6
Turner, M. J., Frost, N., Outar, L., O'Connor, H., Tóth, R., Tóth, L., Chadha, N. J., & Wood, A. G. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1557885 · Cited by 5
Using deliberate practice for inner skills to enhance therapist In-session mindfulness and presence
Orlowski, E. W., Friedlander, M. L., & Moeyaert, M. (2025) · Counselling Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1080/09515070.2025.2551710 · Cited by 3
“According to Parker and Vannest (2009), NAP estimates of 0–.31 are weak effects, estimates of .32–.84 are moderate effects, and .85–1 are strong effects.”
Özkan, Ş. Y., Çakmak, Z., Cevher, Z., Gülboy, E., & Alkoyak, H. Ö. (2022) · Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416472205700408 · Cited by 3
“NAP summarizes data overlap between each phase-A data point and each phase-B data point, respectively (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialEffectiveness of earmuffs in protecting hearing during shooting practice: a case-study
Rawool, V. W., & Campbell, C. (2018) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1441556 · Cited by 3
“Based on expert visual judgments of 200 datasets, Parker and Vannest (2009) suggested following ranges for the NAP index: 0–0.65: weak effects; 0.66–0.92: moderate effects; 0.93–1.0: strong effects.”
BackgroundInfluentialByron, J. R., Sanetti, L. M. H., & Charbonneau, S. (2020) · International Journal of School & Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/21683603.2020.1753605 · Cited by 3
“In addition, we applied Tau-U, a non-overlap index, following recent recommendations for single-case design (Parker et al., 2014) and interpretive guidelines from Parker and Vannest (Parker & Vannest, 2009; weak = 0 – 0.65, moderate = 0.66 – 0.92, large = 0.93 – 1.00).”
MethodInfluentialAssessing consistency of effects when applying multilevel models to single-case data
Manolov, R., & Ferron, J. M. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01417-0 · Cited by 3
Antúnez, R. M., Egea, M. F., Manzanares, A., & Segado, F. (2020) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712320946110 · Cited by 3
“Two techniques suitable for analysis of data in single-case designs were utilized: indices of data overlap (non-overlap of all pairs, NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) between phases to estimate the size of learning effect (or the magnitude of change) and Jacobson and Truax’s (1991) statistical approach…”
MethodHau, F. F.-W., Wong, A. M.-Y., & Ng, M. W.-Y. (2020) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/0265659020967710 · Cited by 4
“A Tau-U score of 0 to .65 indicates a small effect, .66 to .92 a medium effect, and .93 to 1.00 is a large effect (Parker and Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialde Behrends, M. R. (2021) · Journal of EMDR Practice and Research · doi:10.1891/emdr-d-20-00026 · Cited by 4
Gaskell, C., Hague, B., & Kellett, S. (2021) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465821000205 · Cited by 3
Understanding the Effect Size of Peer-Mediated Academic Instruction: A Meta-Analysis
Haas, A., Vannest, K. J., Fuller, M. C., & Ganz, J. B. (2021) · Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/10883576211023329 · Cited by 3
“Again, as with most single-case effect size calculations, NAP does not address trend (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHughes, D. M., Vento-Wilson, M. T., & Boyd, L. E. (2022) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2022_ajslp-21-00242 · Cited by 3
Özlü, Ö., ARSLANOĞLU, A., & Yıkmış, A. (2022) · Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.938438 · Cited by 3
Shillingsburg, M. A., Bartlett, B. L., Thompson, T. M., McCracken, C., & Scahill, L. D. (2023) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-023-09913-9 · Cited by 3
“The average effect size was 0.71 (SD: 0.20; 95% CI [0.64–0.76]), which corresponds to a moderate treatment effect according to NAP interpretive guidelines (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialNeuhauser, A., & Mohr, L. (2023) · Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik · doi:10.57161/z2023-04-07 · Cited by 3
Tounsi, O., Trabelsi, O., Souissi, M. A., Koubaa, A., Gharbi, A., Scharenberg, S., Mkaouer, B., & Bahloul, M. (2023) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.23060 · Cited by 3
A robot intervention for adults with ADHD and insomnia–A mixed-method proof-of-concept study
Støre, S. J., Tillfors, M., Angelhoff, C., & Norell‐Clarke, A. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290984 · Cited by 4
Samudre, M. D., & LeJeune, L. M. (2023) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/727227 · Cited by 3
“NAP represents the number of pairs that show no overlap, divided by the total number of comparisons (Parker & Vannest, 2009 ).”
BackgroundZhang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.3390/bs14030213 · Cited by 3
“If it exceeds 0.93, it signifies a strong effect [43].”
BackgroundInfluentialVints, W. A. J., Levin, O., van Griensven, M., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Masiulis, N., Verbunt, J., & van Laake‐Geelen, C. C. M. (2024) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-024-03699-9 · Cited by 3
“The NAP (Nonoverlap of All Pairs) value equals the number of comparison pairs showing no overlap, divided by the total number of comparisons, and can be considered an area under the curve percentage from a receiver operating characteristic analysis [60].”
MethodPereira, G.-L., Martínez-Díaz, C., García-Morales, R., & Parga, M. X. F. (2024) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100801 · Cited by 3
Dialectical behavior therapy in the treatment of perfectionism: A Single case design
Sugara, G. S., Puspitawati, A., Arumsari, C., Rahimsyah, A. P., & Muhajirin, M. (2023) · Konselor · doi:10.24036/0202312246-0-86 · Cited by 3
“In assessing the effect size of the single subject intervention calculated using Cohen's d, 0.87 indicates a small effect, 0.87–2.67 indicates a moderate effect, and > 2.67 indicates a large effect (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
MethodInfluentialHoopmann, L., Bailey, B., & Arciuli, J. (2024) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549507.2024.2425012 · Cited by 3
“Where possible, standard effect sizes were derived using the formulas and tools of Lenhard and Lenhard (2016) for group design studies and the Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP) statistic for single subject design studies as recommended by Parker and Vannest (2009).”
Johnson, Z. G., Houchins, D. E., Varjas, K., Jimenez, E., & McKinney, T. (2024) · Education and Treatment of Children · doi:10.1007/s43494-024-00140-1 · Cited by 6
“Using methods of calculating effect sizes in single-case design studies (Parker & Vannest, 2009; Pustejovsky, 2015), the calculation of nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP) was carried out by the primary investigator.”
Single-case design and evaluation in R: An introduction and tutorial for school psychologists
McGill, R. J. (2016) · International Journal of School & Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1173610 · Cited by 3
“…users would be greatly benefited by the development of syntax commands for calculating more robust estimators such as nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009), which can be converted to a nonparametric distribution via the phi coefficient, and regression-based effect sizes that…”
BackgroundMcGill, R. J., Kennedy, K. S., & Busse, R. T. (2016) · Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) · Cited by 3
Grünke, M., Urton, K., & Karnes, J. (2018) · Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology · doi:10.5539/jedp.v8n2p187 · Cited by 3
“Such an overall effect size is generally considered as large (Parker & Vannest, 2009; Vannest & Ninci, 2015).”
BackgroundZeng, S., Zhao, H., Hu, X., Pereira, B. A., Pan, Q., Chen, M., Reyes, A., & Stone‐MacDonald, A. (2021) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22599 · Cited by 4
Exploring Coaching Strategies in a Parent-Implemented Intervention for Toddlers
Brown, J. A. (2012) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 3
Desenhos de investigação de sujeito único em educação especial
Aguiar, C., Moiteiro, A. R., Correia, N. E. F. G., & Pimentel, J. S. (2012) · Análise Psicológica · doi:10.14417/ap.46 · Cited by 3
A Single-Subject Evaluation of the Treatment of Morphing Fear
Zysk, E., Shafran, R., & Williams, T. I. (2017) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.03.003 · Cited by 3
Sherlock, P., Chezan, L. C., Wolfe, K., Drasgow, E., & Habing, B. (2018) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2018.1460902 · Cited by 3
DeRosa, N. M., Sullivan, W. E., & Roane, H. S. (2019) · Autism and child psychopathology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20843-1_27 · Cited by 3
Evaluación de activación conductual en universitarios que consumen mariguana: estudio piloto
Torres, E. S. B., Morales, S. E. C., & Mandujano, J. L. (2021) · Revista Internacional de Investigación en Adicciones · doi:10.28931/riiad.2021.2.02 · Cited by 3
The effects of real-time visual performance feedback on teacher feedback.
Sweigart, C. A. (2015) · doi:10.18297/etd/2082 · Cited by 3
The Effect of Yoga on Attention in Students Diagnosed with ADHD
Petsche, A. (2016) · OpenCommons at University of Connecticut (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 3
Halayko, J. (2014) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3sj19z1n · Cited by 3
Muñoz-Martínez, A., Gómez, Y., Naismith, I., & González-Rodríguez, D. (2023) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465823000085 · Cited by 1
“Parker and Vannest (2009) provided the following standards to interpret NAP effect sizes based on the analysis performed with simple phase change and complex phase SCDs: weak (0–0.65), medium (0.66– 0.92), and large (0.93–1.0).”
MethodInfluentialVives-Vilarroig, J., Ruíz-Bernardo, P., & Gómez, A. G. (2024) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-023-06174-5 · Cited by 4
“For their interpreta - tion, Parker and Vannest (2009, p. 4) examine the size of the”
Liu, L., Lei, J., & Wang, C. (2024) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2024.2352375 · Cited by 2
“This study used the non-overlap of all pairs (NAP) method, which has high precision and statistical power (Parker & Vannest, 2009), to assess the intervention effectiveness of social stories on social interaction.”
Özlü, Ö., & Yıkmış, A. (2024) · Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1443417 · Cited by 2
Piloting an approach to family-implemented decoding instruction for kindergarten-aged children
Hall, C., Dahl‐Leonard, K., Roberts, G. J., Capin, P., Peacott, D., Thayer, L., & Conradi, K. (2025) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.02.011 · Cited by 2
Caron, J. G., Ryan, N., Babb, S., Holyfield, C., & O’Brien, M. (2025) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.1080/07434618.2025.2466166 · Cited by 2
“…rate differences (iRD) were also computed as an effect size indicator; iRD scores greater than 0.75 were considered very large effect sizes (Parker & vannest, 2009). an online iRD calculator was used to calculate iRD (vannest et al., 2011). to ensure the integrity and consistency of data…”
InfluentialGalanis, P., & Gena, Α. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15050587 · Cited by 2
Newson, N. K., Begeny, J. C., Wang, J., Jordán, Y. P., Codding, R. S., & Kromminga, K. R. (2025) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.70034 · Cited by 2
“Interpretation of NAP effect sizes are as follows: weak (0 – 0.65), medium (0.66 – 0.93), and large (0.94 – 1.00; Parker and Vannest 2009).”
InfluentialUsing point-of-view video modelling with young autistic students: a systematic literature review
Moustaka, M., Kossyvaki, L., & Terlektsi, E. (2025) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2025.2533936 · Cited by 3
Analysis of Treatment Effect Indices Used in Counseling Single Case Research
Brown, C. L., Turner, R. C., Peltier, C. J., Lo, W., Christian, D. D., & Smarinsky, E. C. (2025) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.2025.2531834 · Cited by 2
“…by Peltier et al. (2024) systematic review of 50 SCRD counseling studies, where 46% reported PEM and 24% reported PND. Nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) and Tau/Tau-U (Parker, Vannest, Davis, & Sauber, 2011) were developed later in time, however counseling researchers reported…”
Wallace, R., Lacey, C. J., & Sargisson, R. J. (2025) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102056 · Cited by 3
Synthesizing Single-Case Experimental Designs: Modeling Complex Data Structures
Cheng, K., Yi, Z.-Y., Moeyaert, M., Beretvas, S. N., den Noortgate, W. V., & Ferron, J. M. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-025-09602-x · Cited by 2
de Carvalho, M. C. L., Simões, M. D. M. D., Adler, U., Viana, A. B., de Sousa, C. N. S., & Sanders, L. L. O. (2025) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/bcp.70382 · Cited by 4
“Several effect size measures for SCEDs exist, such as the Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP), 49 Percent of Non-overlapping Data (PND) 50 and between-case Standardized Mean Difference.”
Halkowski, M., Kubina, R. M., Leitao, N. D. L., & Winn, K. (2026) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-026-01380-4 · Cited by 2
GRAPE Model of Rational Emotive Behavior Coaching for Growth Mindset and Academic Resilience
Sugara, G. S., Payza, R. Z., Muhajirin, M., & Rahimsyah, A. P. (2026) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-026-00691-9 · Cited by 2
“This provides additional insights into the intervention’s impact on the target variable (Parker & Vannest, 2009 ).”
Efficacy of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with the Use of In-Room Coaching
Reeve, C. A., Dukes, C., Damashek, A. L., & Gaynor, S. T. (2025) · Child & Family Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1080/07317107.2025.2589753 · Cited by 2
“Tentative interpretive ranges for non-overlap of all pairs analyses are: 0–.65 = small effect size, .66–.92 = medium effect size, and .93–1.00 = large effect size (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialOhtake, Y. (2016) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.18926/bgeou/54228 · Cited by 2
Effects of Computerized Social Skills Instruction for At-Risk Adolescents
Vernon, D. S., & Schumaker, J. B. (2021) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/0162643421997043 · Cited by 2
“In addition, the Nono-verlap of All Pairs (NAP) statistic (Parker & Vannest, 2009) was calculated along with Tau U for the effect size.”
MethodWaddington, H. L., Curtis, S., van Noorden, L. E., Sigafoos, J., van der Meer, L. A. J., & Whitehouse, A. (2022) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2022.2120601 · Cited by 2
“…statistic was calculated to determine the effect size of improvements from parent coaching baseline to: (a) parent coaching, (b) direct therapy baseline, (c) direct therapy, and (d) maintenance for parent fidelity and the three child dependent variables with the parent (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
MethodVehicle noise: comparison of loudness ratings in the field and the laboratory
Llorach, G., Oetting, D., Vormann, M., Meis, M., & Hohmann, V. (2022) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2022.2147867 · Cited by 2
“…loudness perception ratings were analysed with two different approaches: metric-model analysis (repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons) and ordinal analysis (non-overlap of all pairs (NAP) (Parker and Vannest 2009) and group comparisons with Mann – Whitney U tests).”
MethodNeveu, M., Geurten, M., & Rousselle, L. (2023) · Applied Neuropsychology Child · doi:10.1080/21622965.2023.2170798 · Cited by 3
“Non-overlap of All Pairs scores (NAP-scores) were calculated to compare performance (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
MethodInfluentialLeibinger, K., Murray, E., Aschenbrenner, S., & Randerath, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071532 · Cited by 2
“According to the interpretation guidelines by Parker and Vannest (2009), this index (Tau-U = − 0.4791, Z = − 2.533, p = 0.011) is in the range of medium effect sizes ( ∣ 0.32–0.84 ∣ ).”
MethodInfluentialGregory, J. C., Romero, D. E., & Jones, M. S. (2023) · NeuroRegulation · doi:10.15540/nr.10.3.159 · Cited by 2
Zink, H. H., Norman, E. R. V., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2023) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.23120 · Cited by 2
Zingg, S., de Graaf, M., & Hilfiker, R. (2023) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.063 · Cited by 2
Behavior Change Potential of Classroom Behavior Management Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review
Mittiga, S. R., Freeman, N. C., Leif, E., Furlonger, B., & Pattison, E. (2024) · Education and Treatment of Children · doi:10.1007/s43494-024-00122-3 · Cited by 2
“Low NAP values ( 0.66) suggest weak or no evidence of an effect (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialSchool staff delivery of a solution focused intervention to support pupils' behaviour
Watson, E., & Hayes, B. (2024) · Support for Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9604.12471 · Cited by 2
“%) effects (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
Bundock, K., Callan, G. L., McClain, M. B., Benney, C. M., Longhurst, D. N., & Rolf, K. R. (2024) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194241254094 · Cited by 2
“…between each baseline phase data point and each intervention phase data point) provides a case-level effect size that is highly correlated with R 2 (Parker & Vannest, 2009), and LRR (a metric that compares two mean levels) provides a comparison of level change between baseline and intervention and…”
VanderWoude, T., & Ripple, H. E. (2024) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102429 · Cited by 2
Online Intervention to Prevent Summer Learning Loss For Struggling First Grade Writers
Klein, P. D., Casola, M., Dombroski, J., Shaw, K., & Thompson, S. C. (2024) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2024.2389795 · Cited by 1
“For comparing the level of scores between phases for each participant, we report Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
Kim, S.-Y., Rispoli, M. J., Mason, R. A., Lory, C., Gregori, E. V., Roberts, C. A., Whitford, D. K., & Wang, D. (2024) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-024-06525-w · Cited by 2
“Tau-U ranges from 0 to 1 and is interpreted as small effects (i.e., 0–0.65), medium effects (i.e., 0.66–0.92), or large effects (i.e., 0.93–1.0) (Parker & Vannest, 2009 ).”
InfluentialWolters-Leermakers, N., van Wingerden, E., Gerkema-Nijhof, R., & van Balkom, H. (2024) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2024.2408673 · Cited by 2
“A small treatment effect is represented by a NAP percentage between 0% and 65%, whereas 66–92% reflects a medium effect, and 93–100% a large effect (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
Wiertz, C. M. H., van Meulenbroek, T., Lamper, C., Hemmen, B., Sep, S. J. S., Huijnen, I. P. J., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Burgers, J. S., & Verbunt, J. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/63951 · Cited by 2
“It can be calculated as an area under the curve [60].”
BackgroundInfluentialFournier, C., Michelon, C., Granit, V., Audoyer, P., Bernardot, A., Picot, M., Kheddar, A., & Baghdadli, A. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084110 · Cited by 2
Technology based self-monitoring for a student with EBD to improve academic engagement
Maxcy, L., Soares, D. A., & Harrison, J. R. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/15864 · Cited by 2
Pairing phrase‐cued text with readers theatre: Effects on reading prosody and automaticity
Rodgers, E. M., D’Agostino, J. V., Levin, J. R., & Rasinski, T. V. (2025) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.70002 · Cited by 2
Oğur, Ç., & Olçay, S. (2025) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-025-03152-z · Cited by 2
“Individuals with ASD are four to eight times more exposed to sexual abuse when compared to individuals with typical development (McDaniels & Fleming, 2016) due to communication difficulties such as denial or asking for help (Edel-son, 2010), inability to recognize the social cues that could allow them to differentiate…”
InfluentialRobayo, S., Velandia-Alarcón, C., García, Y., Skinta, M., & Muñoz-Martínez, A. (2025) · Clinical Case Studies · doi:10.1177/15346501251407940 · Cited by 1
“Data were analyzed combining visual inspection (level, trend, variability, immediacy of change) with the Non-Overlap of All Pairs (NAP) index (Parker & Vannest, 2009), a non-parametric statistic of effect size.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parker, Richard I.
- ORCID
- Vannest, Kimberly
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-367
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028628292
- Cited by
- 1,126
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- effect size, single subject research, data overlap, R-squared, visual assessment, confidence interval width, statistical power
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Psychological, Probability, Psychology, Research Design, Confidence Intervals, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review