The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.
Abstract
Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP), an index of data overlap between phases in single-case research, is demonstrated and field tested with 200 published AB contrasts. NAP is a novel application of an established effect size known in various forms as Area Under the Curve (AUC), the Common Language Effect Size (CL), the Probability of Superiority (PS), the Dominance Statistic (DS), Mann-Whitney's U, and Sommers D, among others. NAP was compared with 3 other non-overlap-based indices: PND (percent of nonoverlapping data), PEM (percent of data points exceeding the median), and PAND (percent of all nonoverlapping data), as well as Pearson's R(2). Five questions were addressed about NAP: (a) typical NAP values, (b) its ability to discriminate among typical single-case research results, (c) its power and precision (confidence interval width), (d) its correlation with the established effect size index, R(2), and (e) its relationship with visual judgments. Results were positive, the new index equaling or outperforming the other overlap indices on most criteria.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the effect sizes found in SCED studies are usually higher than those found in group designs such as randomized controlled trials (Parker and Vannest, 2009; Shadish et al., 2016).”
From A Multiple-Baseline Evaluation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Focused on Repetitive Negative Thinking for Comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depression (2020) · cites this paper as Parker and Vannest, 2009
In the citing paper
“Parker and Vannest (2009) proposed the following ranges in order to interpret NAP; scores ranging from 0 to 0.65 are weak effects, from 0.66 to 0.92 are medium effects, and from 0.93 to 1.0 are large or strong effects.”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for individuals with depressive and anxiety symptoms following acquired brain injury: A non-concurrent multiple baseline design across four cases. (2023) · cites this paper as Parker and Vannest (2009)
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Practical Nonparametric Statistics
Groggel, D. J., & Conover, W. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271101 · Cited by 11,076
The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290507100203 · Cited by 3,368
Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances
Brown, M. B., & Forsythe, A. B. (1974) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10482955 · Cited by 3,216
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Graphical Methods for Data Analysis.
Healy, M. J. R., Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., & Tukey, P. A. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981587 · Cited by 2,315
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Newson, R. B., 2000. snp15.1: Update to somersd. Stata Technical Bulletin 57: 35. In Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 10, 322–323. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Gosens, L. C. F., Poelen, E. A. P., Didden, R., de Jonge, J. M., Schellekens, A., VanDerNagel, J., Onghena, P., & Otten, R. (2023) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2023.07.007 · Cited by 14
Murphy, A., & Arciuli, J. (2024) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12448 · Cited by 31
Wallace, S. E., & Kayode, S. (2017) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1245403 · Cited by 13
“The researchers computed effect sizes of the communicative flexibility score obtained from the RCT probe using the per cent of non-overlapping data (PND) and non-overlap of all pairs (NAP) for each word list separately for each phase according to Parker and Vannest (2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSeok, S., DaCosta, B., McHenry-Powell, M., Heitzman-Powell, L. S., & Ostmeyer, K. F. (2018) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci8040170 · Cited by 14
“PND is simple and straightforward to calculate and ranges from 0% to 100% [27], but some researchers have argued against its use [34].”
BackgroundMurphy, J. M., Hawkins, R. O., & Nabors, L. (2019) · Contemporary School Psychology · doi:10.1007/s40688-019-00226-3 · Cited by 14
Learning Fractions with a Virtual Manipulative Based Graduated Instructional Sequence
Bouck, E. C., Maher, C. E., Park, J., & Ionia, A. W. (2020) · Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416472005500105 · Cited by 16
“…research.org/calculators/tau-u), to determine the Tau-U between baseline and intervention (virtual plus abstract) for each student and applied the metrics regarding the size of the effect (i.e., above 92% large, less than 66% small, and between a medium; Parker et al., 2009; Parker et al., 2011).”
Effects of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy on Academic Grit
Sari, S. A., Sugara, G. S., & Isti‘adah, F. N. (2022) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-022-00444-4 · Cited by 14
“In an assessment of single-case intervention effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d that 0.87 indicated a small effect while 0.87–2.67 suggested a medium effect and a large effect being anything > 2.67 (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
MethodInfluentialTHE CATERPILLAR GAME: A CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Floress, M. T., Rock, A. L., & Hailemariam, A. (2017) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22000 · Cited by 14
Imagine Math Facts Improves Multiplication Fact Fluency in Third-Grade Students
Berrett, A. N., & Carter, N. J. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-017-9288-1 · Cited by 14
“By investigating all possible comparisons, the resulting NAP fraction is ‘‘the probability that a score drawn at random from a treatment phase will exceed (overlap) that of a score drawn at random from a baseline phase’’ (Parker and Vannest 2009).”
BackgroundMethodSingh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Medvedev, O. N., Sreenivas, S., Myers, R. E., & Hwang, Y. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1075-0 · Cited by 19
“No overlap indicates that all data points at baseline are higher than those at subsequent time points (i.e., intervention) corresponding to Φ = 1, while complete overlap (Φ = 0) reflects no change over time (Parker et al., 2007; Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundJozwik, S., & Mustian, A. L. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1655690 · Cited by 14
Erturk, B., Hansen, S. G., Machalicek, W., & Kunze, M. G. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-020-09387-1 · Cited by 14
Impact of Social Communication Interventions on Infants and Toddlers With or At-Risk for Autism
Morgan, L., Rubin, E., Coleman, J. J., Frymark, T., Wang, B., & Cannon, L. J. (2014) · Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/1088357614539835 · Cited by 14
“Conventions for applying NAP, including classification of the magnitude of the effect size (i.e., small = 0–0.31, medium = 0.32–0.84, and large = 0.85–1.00), were adapted from Parker and Vannest (2009).”
MethodInfluentialSchardt, A. A., Miller, F. G., & Bedesem, P. L. (2018) · Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions · doi:10.1177/1098300718773462 · Cited by 13
Alzrayer, N. M., Muharib, R., & Wood, C. L. (2019) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-019-09681-5 · Cited by 13
Effect Sizes in Single-Case Aphasia Studies: A Comparative, Autocorrelation-Oriented Analysis
Archer, B., Azios, J. H., Müller, N., & Macatangay, L. (2019) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-l-18-0186 · Cited by 13
Efficacy of a No-Team Version of the Good Behavior Game in High School Classrooms
Ford, W. B., Radley, K. C., Tingstrom, D. H., & Dufrene, B. A. (2020) · Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions · doi:10.1177/1098300719890059 · Cited by 13
“In conjunction with visual inspection, effect sizes were calculated at the conclusion of the final intervention phase utilizing nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
MethodBone, E. K., Bouck, E. C., & Satsangi, R. (2021) · Exceptionality · doi:10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057 · Cited by 13
Maxwell-Keys, C., Wood, A. G., & Turner, M. J. (2021) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102098 · Cited by 13
Utilization of Superheroes Social Skills to Reduce Disruptive and Aggressive Behavior
O’Handley, R. D., Radley, K. C., & Cavell, H. J. (2015) · Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth · doi:10.1080/1045988x.2015.1038775 · Cited by 13
“NAP, a nonparametric method for determining data overlap between each baseline data point and each intervention data point, was calculated using procedures described by Parker and Vannest (2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHawkins, R. O., Haydon, T. F., McCoy, D. M., & Howard, A. J. (2017) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000202 · Cited by 13
“Effect sizes also were estimated using the nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP) statistic (Parker & Vannest, 2009; Vannest, Parker, & Gonen, 2011).”
InfluentialGreen, V. A., Prior, T., Smart, E. L., Boelema, T., Drysdale, H., Harcourt, S., Roche, L., & Waddington, H. L. (2017) · Education and Treatment of Children · doi:10.1353/etc.2017.0015 · Cited by 13
“According to Parker and Vannest (2009), this finding of 42% would suggest an overall “weak or small effect: 0-.65” (p. 364).”
BackgroundIssues and Advances in the Systematic Review of Single-Case Research: A Commentary on the Exemplars
Manolov, R., Guilera, G., & Solanas, A. (2017) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932517726143 · Cited by 13
“First, the nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) is computationally equivalent to an indicator called probability of superiority, for which Grissom and Kim (2001) provided an expression for estimating its variance.4 Second, for the percentage change index (PCI; or mean baseline…”
MethodUse of superheroes social skills with middle school‐age students with autism spectrum disorder
Murphy, A., Radley, K. C., & Helbig, K. A. (2018) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22104 · Cited by 13
The Impact of Psychotherapeutic Reiki on Anxiety
Webster, L. C., Holden, J. M., Ray, D. C., Price, E. W., & Hastings, T. (2019) · Journal of Creativity in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/15401383.2019.1688214 · Cited by 16
“Finally, we interpreted the e ff ect size of the treatment according to the following delineations o ff ered by Parker and Vannest (2009): weak e ff ectiveness (0.65), medium e ff ectiveness (.66-.92), or strong e ff ectiveness (.93 – 1.0).”
MethodInfluentialEvaluation of a Treatment Package to Increase Mean Length of Utterances for Children with Autism
Shillingsburg, M. A., Frampton, S. E., Schenk, Y. A., Bartlett, B. L., Thompson, T. M., & Hansen, B. A. (2020) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-020-00417-y · Cited by 13
Yucesoy‐Ozkan, S., Rakap, S., & Gulboy, E. (2020) · British Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12294 · Cited by 18
A Meta-Analysis on Behavioral Support Training and General Education Teacher Implementation
Samudre, M. D., LeJeune, L. M., Anderson, E. J., Viotto, J., Brock, M. E., & Nichols, H. (2023) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/00144029231172175 · Cited by 12
“We calculated nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) in addition to the BC-SMD.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialvan der Hoeven, M. L., Plukaard, S., Schlattmann, N., Lindauer, R., & Hein, I. M. (2023) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107064 · Cited by 13
“We calculated the Percentage of Data Points Exceeding the Median (PEM; Ma, 2006) and Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) with the Single-case effect size calculator (Pustejovsky & Swan, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBorst, M., Moeyaert, M., & van Rood, Y. (2024) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2024.2314883 · Cited by 12
“A NAP score of 0.65 represented a weak e ff ect, a score of .66-.92 represented a medium e ff ect, and a score of .93-1.0 represented a large e ff ect (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialUsing Visual Scene Displays With Young Children: An Evidence-Based Practice Synthesis
Patenaude, D., McNaughton, D., & Liang, Z. (2024) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434241263061 · Cited by 12
“Both approaches are widely used in single-case research (thereby supporting comparisons with other interventions), and can be interpreted by interested individuals without advanced statistical training (Parker & Vannest, 2009; Scruggs et al., 1987).”
Fresán, U., López‐Moreno, M., Fàbregues, S., Bernard, P., Boronat, A., Araújo‐Soares, V., König, L. M., Buekers, J., & Chevance, G. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-85307-5 · Cited by 23
“NAP is a non-parametric method that indicates the probability that a score drawn at random during the follow-up phase will exceed that of a score drawn at random at baseline (values between 0 and 100%, with 50% indicating no change) 45 .”
Cariveau, T., Shillingsburg, M. A., Alamoudi, A., Thompson, T. M., Bartlett, B. L., Gillespie, S. E., & Scahill, L. D. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-019-09340-x · Cited by 12
Lewandowski, L. J., Martens, B. K., Clawson, A. J., & Reid, T. A. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-020-09367-5 · Cited by 12
“According to Parker and Vannest (2009), NAP values lower than .65 indicate a weak effect, from .66 to .92 a medium effect, and from .93 to 1.0 a strong effect.”
BackgroundInfluentialImplementing an applied verbal behavior model in classrooms
Shillingsburg, M. A., Frampton, S. E., Juban, B., Weddle, S. A., & Silva, M. R. (2021) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1807 · Cited by 14
Anthony, N., & Bobzien, J. (2021) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05298-w · Cited by 12
Ortega, J. V., Moeyaert, M., Sivaraman, M., Tarifa‐Rodríguez, A., & Fernández‐Castilla, B. (2023) · Autism and child psychopathology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19964-6_28 · Cited by 12
Comparison of Two Word Learning Techniques and the Effect of Neighborhood Density for Late Talkers
DeVeney, S. L., Cress, C. J., & Reid, R. (2014) · Communication Disorders Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1525740113516788 · Cited by 12
“Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009) was used to provide an estimate of effect size.”
MethodJulien, H. M., & Reichle, J. E. (2016) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2015_lshss-15-0035 · Cited by 15
Michiels, B., Heyvaert, M., & Onghena, P. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0885-7 · Cited by 12
“In fact, many authors have pointed out that the PND has two important limitations (e.g., Parker & Vannest, 2009; Shadish et al., 2008; Wolery et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTeaching Children with Intellectual Disabilities through Video Prompting: Smartphone vs. Tablet
Özkan, Ş. Y., Gülboy, E., & Kaya, F. (2018) · International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education · doi:10.20489/intjecse.454433 · Cited by 12
“…level, trend, and stability in a phase and between successive phases (Kazdin, 1982); the effect sizes were calculated using Tau-U (Parker, Vannest, Davis, & Sauber, 2011, Rakap, 2015; Rakap, Yücesoy-Özkan, & Kalkan, 2018) and Nonoverlap All Pairs (NAP; Parker & Vannest, 2009; Rakap et al., 2018).”
MethodJozwik, S., Cuenca‐Carlino, Y., Mustian, A. L., & Douglas, K. H. (2019) · Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth · doi:10.1080/1045988x.2018.1523126 · Cited by 12
“To calculate effect size estimates we used nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP) and procedures described by Parker and Vannest (2009), which involved comparisons between baseline- and intervention-phase data.”
MethodParent‐implemented reading interventions within a response to intervention framework
Zhou, Q., Dufrene, B. A., Mercer, S. H., Olmi, D. J., & Tingstom, D. H. (2019) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22251 · Cited by 12
Parent Coaching via Telepractice for Children From Latinx Backgrounds With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Yllades, V. A., Ganz, J. B., Wattanawongwan, S., Dunn, C. M., & Pierson, L. M. (2021) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434211033604 · Cited by 12
“Unfortunately, NAP did not do as well as other measures in precision and its width of confidence intervals (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodA new virtual reality tool for unilateral cerebral palsy rehabilitation: Two single-case studies
Dinomais, M., Veaux, F., Yamaguchi, T., Richard, P., Richard, I., & Nguyen, S. (2013) · Developmental Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.3109/17518423.2013.778347 · Cited by 14
“The BBT for each hand, which constitutes the continuous measure of motor function during the treatment, were analysed using the ‘‘nonoverlap of all pairs’’ (NAP) method [9], which summarizes data overlap between each baseline data point and each intervention data point, in turn.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWalcott, C. M., Marett, K., & Hessel, A. B. (2014) · Journal of Applied School Psychology · doi:10.1080/15377903.2013.874389 · Cited by 12
“Study 1 resulted in an average NAP index of .78, which suggests medium effects (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundResultKiling, I. Y., Due, C., Li, D. E., & Turnbull, D. A. (2018) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244018754935 · Cited by 13
Lerman, A., Mais, D., Nissani, Y., & Malcolm, T. R. (2022) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2021.2020717 · Cited by 11
“…NonOverlap of All Pairs (NAP), two measures that complement each other in that Cohen’s d gives information about the size of change (Beeson & Robey, 2006) whereas NAP scores indicate how much overlap occurs between pre- and post-treatment data points (Conner et al., 2018; Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMize, M., Park, Y., & Martin, M. C. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2060351 · Cited by 15
“Thus, the PND and notable progress in the intervention and maintenance phase might lead to very large effect sizes from studies with small sample size included in SCDs [60,68].”
BackgroundInfluentialCrewdson, M. A., Richardson, R. D., Fowler, K., Skinner, C. H., Wright, S. P., & Cihak, D. F. (2022) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2022.2043127 · Cited by 11
“For both compliments and encouragements, NAP effect size estimates for treatment effects (i.e., increases from baseline to intervention and withdrawal to intervention phases, and intervention phase with the withdrawal phase) were 1.00 or large (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDoes the choice of a linear trend-assessment technique matter in the context of single-case data?
Manolov, R. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-02013-0 · Cited by 11
“…percent of nonoverlapping data (Scruggs et al., 1987) was extended to remove linear trend (Manolov & Solanas, 2009), the nonoverlap of all pairs (Parker & Vannest, 2009) was extended to take monotonic trend into account in the proposal of Tau-U (Parker, Vannest, Davis, & Sauber, 2011), and the…”
BackgroundHolyfield, C., Pope, L. E., Light, J., Jakobs, E., Laubscher, E., McNaughton, D., & Pfaff, O. (2023) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2023_ajslp-22-00255 · Cited by 11
Ellis, P. K., Scherer, N. J., & Lien, K. M. (2023) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549507.2023.2199176 · Cited by 11
“Parker and Vannest (2009).”
Wilson, K. P. (2011) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2011.623859 · Cited by 11
“NAP pairs all baseline and treatment data points to determine the percentage of nonoverlapping pairs (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Addante, L. M., & Pinto, K. (2016) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445516649581 · Cited by 11
“Changes in leg responses and signs of positive personal involvement (see above) from the baseline to the intervention phase were analyzed via the “Nonoverlap of All Pairs” (NAP) method (Parker & Vannest, 2009; Parker, Vannest, & Davis, 2011).”
Methodvan der Meer, L. A. J., Waddington, H. L., Sigafoos, J., Balandin, S., Bravo, A., Ogilvie, E., Matthews, T., & Sawchak, A. (2017) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2017.1297013 · Cited by 11
“The nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP) statistic was calculated to determine the effect size of improvements for each outcome measure (Parker and Vannest 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCollier‐Meek, M. A., Sanetti, L. M. H., Gould, K. M., & Pereira, B. A. (2020) · Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation · doi:10.1080/10474412.2020.1777874 · Cited by 11
“…due to more data comparisons, stronger validation due to visual judgments, and greater score precision when compared to other overlap statistics (Parker & Vannest, 2009); and IRD accounts for the rate of improvement during the treatment phase minus the rate of improvement during the baseline…”
MethodResultShah, M., Moskowitz, L. J., & Felver, J. C. (2022) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-01887-7 · Cited by 11
“NAP scores of 0–65% nonoverlap indicate weak effects, 66–92% nonoverlap indicate moderate effects, and 93–100% nonoverlap indicate strong effects (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodDavenport, M. A., Romero, M. E., Lewis, C. D., Lawson, T., Ferguson, B., Stichter, J., & Kahng, S. (2023) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05181-8 · Cited by 11
“NAP is calculated by determining the frequency of overlap between the baseline and intervention data points (Parker & Vannest, 2009; Brossart et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe effect of graph standardization on intervention evaluation of practitioner‐created graphs
Lewis, H. H. J., Radley, K. C., & Dart, E. H. (2021) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22621 · Cited by 11
A proposal for the assessment of replication of effects in single‐case experimental designs
Manolov, R., Tanious, R., & Fernández‐Castilla, B. (2022) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.923 · Cited by 11
“…each A-B comparison could be: (a) empirically based interpretative benchmarks for quantifications of effect (e.g., Harrington & Velicer, 2015; Parker & Vannest, 2009); (b) subjective evaluation of the participants or their significant ones, as part of the assessment of social validity…”
MethodOrtega, J. V., Pereira, A. P.-B., & Tarifa‐Rodríguez, A. (2022) · Autism and child psychopathology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88538-0_27 · Cited by 13
Liu, T., Martinez-Torres, K. A., Mazzone, J., Camarata, S., & Lense, M. D. (2023) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-023-06053-z · Cited by 11
“NAPs in the range of 0 to 0.65 are considered weak effects, 0.66 to 0.92 is a medium effect, and 0.93 to 1.0 is a strong effect (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
InfluentialEVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF ON-TASK IN A BOX AS A CLASS-WIDE INTERVENTION
Battaglia, A. A., Radley, K. C., & Ness, E. J. (2015) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.21858 · Cited by 11
“NAP scores were calculated using the Parker and Vannest (2009) procedures.”
BackgroundMethodWurm, M., Strandberg, E. K., Lorenz, C., Tillfors, M., Buhrman, M., Holländare, F., & Boersma, K. (2017) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2017.10.004 · Cited by 11
“NAP is a nonparametric quantitative approach comparing every measurement in phase A with every measurement in phase B to determine overlap, non-overlap or tie (Parker and Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWu, S., Gadke, D. L., & Stratton, K. K. (2018) · Journal of Applied School Psychology · doi:10.1080/15377903.2018.1443984 · Cited by 11
“According to Parker and Vannest (2009), NAP determines the amount of overlap between baseline and treatment phases or between two intervention conditions within a phase.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWallin, E., Parling, T., Weineland, S., & Dahl, J. C. (2018) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.08.007 · Cited by 11
Şen, N., & Şen, S. (2019) · Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi · doi:10.21031/epod.419625 · Cited by 11
Ramirez, L. H., Hawkins, R. O., Collins, T. A., Ritter, C., & Haydon, T. F. (2019) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.17105/spr-2017-0122.v48-1 · Cited by 11
“NAP is a nonparametric test to evaluate data overlap between baseline/withdrawal and treatment phases and is appropriate for single case research designs (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTranslations in Stimulus–Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations
da Silva, S. P., & Williams, A. M. (2019) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00228-9 · Cited by 11
“…assessed 13 peer-reviewed, published experiments and found an overall moderate effect (using nonoverlap of all pairs, NAP, effect-size estimations; see Parker & Vannest, 2009) for the use of SSP to increase vocalizations in the eight published studies for which effect sizes could be estimated.”
MethodAssessing Consistency in Single-Case Data Features Using Modified Brinley Plots
Manolov, R., & Tanious, R. (2020) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445520982969 · Cited by 11
“…is called CONEFF and entails computing five effect size measures: a standardized mean difference, difference in ordinary least squares regression slopes, a variance ratio, the Nonoverlap of all pairs (Parker & Vannest, 2009) and the immediate treatment effect (Michiels & Onghena, 2019).”
MethodVostanis, A., Padden, C., McTiernan, A., & Langdon, P. E. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-021-09432-7 · Cited by 11
A precorrection intervention to teach behavioral expectations to young children
Wahman, C. L., & Anderson, E. J. (2021) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22531 · Cited by 11
Using the VA Framework to Teach Algebra to Middle School Students With High-Incidence Disabilities
Bone, E. K., Bouck, E. C., & Smith, J. P. (2021) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434211019388 · Cited by 11
“Scores between 0.93 to 1 were considered a large effect, 0.66 to .92 a medium effect, and 0 to 0.65 a small effect (Parker et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialMathwin, K., Chapparo, C., & Hinitt, J. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10207-9 · Cited by 11
Identifying Mechanisms of Change
Riley, A. R., & Gaynor, S. T. (2014) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445514530756 · Cited by 12
Fingerhut, J., Xu, X., & Moeyaert, M. (2021) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2021.1933727 · Cited by 12
“In the past, researchers have used benchmarks to determine if an intervention effect is present (e.g. Parker & Vannest, 2009; Vannest & Ninci, 2015).”
BackgroundHawkins, R. O., Collins, T. A., Ramirez, L. H., Murphy, J. M., & Ritter, C. (2019) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/0198742919888758 · Cited by 10
“Suggested NAP interpretations include 0 to .65 as weak effects, .66 to .92 as medium effects, and .93 to 1.0 as strong effects (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHelman, A. L., Dennis, M. S., & Kern, L. (2020) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0731948720929005 · Cited by 10
“The overall TauU for the par ticipants on SU was 1.0, indicating a large effect for the intervention package (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSloane, B. M., Case, F., Quinn, E. D., Sanford-Keller, H., & Logan, S. W. (2023) · Pediatric Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/pep.0000000000001002 · Cited by 10
Byrkjedal, P. T., Thunshelle, A., Spencer, M., Luteberget, L. S., Ivarsson, A., Vårvik, F. T., Lindberg, K., & Bjørnsen, T. (2023) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2023.2227536 · Cited by 10
“Effect sizes for NAP values are reported according to Parker and Vannest’s recommendations: 0–.65 = week effects, .66–.92 = moderate effects, .93–1.0 = large or strong effects (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
MethodInfluentialUrfa, O., & Aşçı, F. H. (2023) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102497 · Cited by 12
Speech-to-text intervention to support text production for students with intellectual disabilities
Sand, C., Svensson, I., Nilsson, S., Selenius, H., & Fälth, L. (2024) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2024.2381785 · Cited by 10
“In this study, the NAP assessed the degree of data overlap between the baseline and intervention phases [31].”
A meta-analysis of technology-based interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties
Alqahtani, S. S. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04159-y · Cited by 10
“To interpret the Tau-U scores, 0.93 and above is considered a large effect size, 0.66 to 0.92 is moderate, and 0.66 and below is weak (Parker and Vannest, 2009; Rispoli et al., 2013).”
InfluentialVersluis, A., de Jongh, A., Mevissen, L., Schuengel, C., Bakkum, L., & Didden, R. (2025) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2495642 · Cited by 10
Tsao, L. (2019) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-019-09534-4 · Cited by 10
Barnard-Brak, L., Richman, D., & Watkins, L. (2020) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-020-00258-8 · Cited by 11
“We chose not to use the exact percent of nonoverlapping data calculation (Scruggs & Mastropieri, 2013) or nonoverlapping of all pairs (NAP); Parker & Vannest, 2009) because these measures do not account for the serial dependency or autocorrelated nature of the data points.”
MethodMoeyaert, M., & Yang, P.-P. (2021) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-021-00141-z · Cited by 10
Kadri, A., Leddy, A., Gracey, F., & Laidlaw, K. (2022) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465822000224 · Cited by 10
“Tau-U statistic was used for cases with significant baseline trend (Parker and Vannest, 2009; Parker et al., 2011).”
MethodHeyvaert, M., Saenen, L., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2015) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.002 · Cited by 10
“However, PND calculation can be complicated when assessing more compacted SCED graphs with more overlap between baseline and intervention data points (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodAssigning and combining probabilities in single-case studies.
Manolov, R., & Solanas, A. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0029248 · Cited by 10
Powell, M. B., & Gadke, D. L. (2018) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22184 · Cited by 10
Measuring the Academic Outcomes of iPads for Students with Autism: a Meta-Analysis
Larwin, K. H., & Aspiranti, K. B. (2019) · Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40489-019-00165-y · Cited by 10
Aydın, O., & Tekin-İftar, E. (2019) · Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.521232 · Cited by 10
Hesam‐Shariati, N., Newton-John, T. R. O., Singh, A. K., Cortes, C., Do, T., Craig, A. R., Middleton, J. W., Jensen, M. P., Trost, Z., Lin, C., et al. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/20979 · Cited by 10
“Nonoverlap methods do not rely on means or medians, but rather consider the individual values of all data points in pairwise comparisons across phases [62].”
Lebrault, H., Chavanne, C., Abada, G., Latinovic, B., Varillon, S., Bertrand, A.-F., Oudjedi, E., Krasny‐Pacini, A., & Chevignard, M. (2021) · Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101535 · Cited by 10
Yosick, R. N., Muskat, L. R., Bowen, C. N., Delfs, C. H., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2015) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1434 · Cited by 10
“…to quantify results from single-subject research to obtain an effect size (e.g., Ma, 2006; Parker, Hagan-Burke, & Vannest, 2007; Manolov, Solanas, Sierra, & Evans, 2011), and NAP has consistently performed favorably against other nonoverlap indices (Parker & Vannest, 2009; Manolov et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA Single Case Study of the Impact of Policy Changes on Identification for Gifted Programs
Warne, R. T., & Price, C. J. (2016) · journal for the education of the gifted · doi:10.1177/0162353215624159 · Cited by 10
“It also is preferable to parametric effect sizes, such as R2, because data from an ABA rarely meet the assumptions of parametric statistics (Parker & Vannest, 2009), especially with the small number of data points in our study.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKing, B., Radley, K. C., Jenson, W. R., & O’Neill, R. (2016) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000162 · Cited by 10
Effects of Consultation on Professional Learning Communities
Preast, J. L., & Burns, M. K. (2018) · Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation · doi:10.1080/10474412.2018.1495084 · Cited by 10
“NAP provides an accurate and efficient measure of effect size for single-case design studies (Parker & Vannest, 2009).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parker, Richard I.
- ORCID
- Vannest, Kimberly
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-367
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028628292
- Cited by
- 1,126
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- effect size, single subject research, data overlap, R-squared, visual assessment, confidence interval width, statistical power
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Psychological, Probability, Psychology, Research Design, Confidence Intervals, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review