Cited by 88Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Predictors and moderators of cognitive and behavioral therapy outcomes for OCD: a patient-level mega-analysis of eight sites

Steketee, Gail, Siev, Jedidiah, Yovel, Iftah, Lit, Keith, Wilhelm, Sabine·2019·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Cognitive (CT) and behavioral treatments (BT) for OCD are efficacious separately and in combination. Tailoring treatment to patient-level predictors and moderators of outcome has the potential to improve outcomes. The present study combined data from eight treatment clinics to examine the benefits of BT (n = 125), CT (n = 108), and CBT (n = 126), and study predictors across all treatments and moderators of outcome by treatment type. All three methods led to large benefits for OCD and depression symptoms. Residual gain scores for OCD symptoms were marginally smaller for BT compared to treatments containing CT. For depression, significantly more gains were evident for CBT than BT, and CT did not differ from either. Significantly fewer BT participants (36%) achieved clinically significant improvement compared to CT (56%), and this was marginally evident for CBT (48%). For all treatments combined, no predictors were identified in residual gain analyses, but clinically improved patients had lower baseline depression and stronger beliefs about responsibility/threat and importance/control of thoughts. Moderator analyses indicated that higher baseline scores on depression adversely affected outcomes for BT but not CT or CBT, and lower OCD severity and more education were associated with positive outcomes for CT only. A trend was evident for higher responsibility/threat beliefs to moderate clinical improvement outcomes for those receiving cognitive (CT and CBT), but not behavioral (BT) treatment. Medication status and comorbidity did not predict or moderate outcomes. Findings are discussed in light of models underlying behavioral and cognitive treatments for OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2018.04.004

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steketee, G., Siev, J., Yovel, I., Lit, K., & Wilhelm, S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Swarthmore College (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Steketee, Gail
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
165-176
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802391460
Cited by
88
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
International OCD Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, cognitive therapy, behavior therapy, treatment outcome predictors, moderators of treatment outcome, comorbid depression, OCD severity, educational attainment, medication status, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Predictive Value of Tests, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review