Cited by 200Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsBone Tissue Engineering Materials

The effect of gelatin incorporation into electrospun poly(l-lactide-co-ɛ-caprolactone) fibers on mechanical properties and cytocompatibility

Lee, Jongman, Tae, Giyoong, Kim, Young Ha, Park, In Su, Kim, Sang-Heon, Kim, Soo Hyun·2008·Biomaterials

Abstract

Very elastic poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) (PLCL) (50:50) copolymer blended with gelatin was electrospun into microfibers from a hexafluoroisopropanol solution. PLCL fiber sheet exhibited the unique soft and flexible behavior while gelatin fiber was hard and brittle. As the gelatin content of PLCL/gelatin fibers increased, Young's modulus was increased, but the elongation was decreased compared to those of PLCL. However, fibers containing 10-30 wt% gelatin demonstrated an enhanced tensile strength with still high elongation to be beneficial for tissue engineering scaffolds. The cytocompatibility of electrospun fiber sheets was evaluated by fibroblasts (NIH-3T3) cell culture. The initial cell adhesion on various fibers after 5h was somewhat similar, but in the order of PLCL>PLCL70/gelatin30 approximately PLCL50/gelatin50>PLCL90/gelatin10 approximately gelatin>PLCL30/gelatin70. However, the cell proliferation exhibited a completely different and strong dependence on the fiber composition: a very high proliferation rate on PLCL90/gelatin10, followed by PLCL>gelatin>PLCL70/gelatin30. Such an enhanced effect of gelatin, especially at 10 wt% content, on strength and cytocompatibility of PLCL/gelatin fibers would be very preferable for tissue engineering scaffolds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.029

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High molecular weight PLCL generally exhibits a higher elastic modulus, maintains better shape stability under loading, and is suitable for applications subjected to heavy loads.

    “High molecular weight PLCL generally exhibits a higher elastic modulus, which allows it to maintain better shape stability under loading, and is suitable for applications subjected to heavy loads [56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J., Tae, G., Kim, Y. H., Park, I. S., Kim, S.-H., & Kim, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Young Ha
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1872-1879
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963578821
Cited by
200
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone), gelatin, electrospun nanofibers, copolymer blends, mechanical properties, Young's modulus, tensile strength, cell adhesion, cell proliferation, cytocompatibility, tissue engineering scaffolds
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Survival, Elasticity, Electrochemistry, Gelatin, Materials Testing, Polyesters, Rotation, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Porosity, NIH 3T3 Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review