Cited by 502Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryMesoporous Materials and CatalysisPolymer Surface Interaction Studies

The effect of PEGylation of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on nonspecific binding of serum proteins and cellular responses

He, Qianjun, Zhang, Jiamin, Shi, Jianlin, Zhu, Ziyan, Zhang, Linxia, Bu, Wenbo, Guo, Limin, Chen, Yu·2010·Biomaterials

Abstract

Highly ordered MCM-41-type mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) with particle sizes of 150 +/- 20 nm were prepared and PEGylated by covalently grafting PEGxk chains of different molecular weights (x = 4, 6, 10, 20) and chain densities (0.05 wt%-3.75 wt%) on the outer surface. The influence of molecular weights and chain densities of PEGxk on the nonspecific binding of PEGylated MSNs to human serum protein (HSA) was investigated. The results revealed that the optimal molecular weights should be not less than 10k, and the corresponding optimal chain densities for PEG10k-MSNs and PEG20k-MSNs were 0.75 wt% and 0.075 wt%, respectively, and the resultant minimum HSA adsorbance (2.5%) on PEGxk-MSNs was far less than that on MSNs (18.7%) without PEGylation. Under the optimal conditions for the minimum HSA adsorbance, the phagocytosis of human THP-1 monocytic leukemia cell line-derived macrophages (THP-1 macrophages) and the hemolysis of human red blood cells (HRBCs) were investigated with MSNs and PEGylated MSNs. A minimum THP-1 phagocytosis percentage (0.1%) and a very low HRBCs hemolysis percentage (0.9%) of PEG10k-MSNs were obtained, which were much lower than those (8.6% and 14.2%, respectively) of MSNs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.046

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PEGylation can produce stealth behavior, helping to counteract the short blood circulation half-lives of conventional MSNs.

    “PEGylation can produce stealth behavior, helping to counteract such effects.73”

    From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [73]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, Q., Zhang, J., Shi, J., Zhu, Z., Zhang, L., Bu, W., Guo, L., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Shanghai Blood Center (CN)
Corresponding author
Shi, Jianlin
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1085-1092
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107423984
Cited by
502
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 31
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
Keywords
PEGylation, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, MCM-41, human serum albumin, nonspecific protein binding, PEG molecular weight, covalent grafting, phagocytosis, hemolysis, THP-1 macrophages, biocompatibility
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Blood Proteins, Cell Line, Humans, Materials Testing, Monocytes, Particle Size, Polyethylene Glycols, Protein Binding, Silicon Dioxide, Porosity, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review