Cited by 112Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

JetValve: Rapid manufacturing of biohybrid scaffolds for biomimetic heart valve replacement

Open access
Capulli, Andrew K., Emmert, Maximillian Y., Pasqualini, Francesco S., Kehl, Debora, Caliskan, Etem, Lind, Johan U., Sheehy, Sean P., Park, Sung Jin +5 more·2017·Biomaterials

Abstract

Tissue engineered scaffolds have emerged as a promising solution for heart valve replacement because of their potential for regeneration. However, traditional heart valve tissue engineering has relied on resource-intensive, cell-based manufacturing, which increases cost and hinders clinical translation. To overcome these limitations, in situ tissue engineering approaches aim to develop scaffold materials and manufacturing processes that elicit endogenous tissue remodeling and repair. Yet despite recent advances in synthetic materials manufacturing, there remains a lack of cell-free, automated approaches for rapidly producing biomimetic heart valve scaffolds. Here, we designed a jet spinning process for the rapid and automated fabrication of fibrous heart valve scaffolds. The composition, multiscale architecture, and mechanical properties of the scaffolds were tailored to mimic that of the native leaflet fibrosa and assembled into three dimensional, semilunar valve structures. We demonstrated controlled modulation of these scaffold parameters and show initial biocompatibility and functionality in vitro. Valves were minimally-invasively deployed via transapical access to the pulmonary valve position in an ovine model and shown to be functional for 15 h.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.033

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gelatin fibers produced by rotary jet spinning and truncated by ultrasonication had a length of 85.9 ± 2.53 μm and a diameter of 4.20 ± 0.23 μm.

    “Gelatin fibers produced by rotary jet spinning (Supplementary Fig. 1b) 14, 15 were truncated by ultrasonication to a length of 85.9 ± 2.53 μm with a diameter of 4.20 ± 0.23 μm (mean ± SEM), reducing variance in length and enabling passage through the printing nozzle with a diameter of 200 μm (Supplementary Fig. 1c–d).”

    From Fibre-infused gel scaffolds guide cardiomyocyte alignment in 3D-printed ventricles (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    Materials and Methods §2.2 describes rotary jet spinning of P4HB/gelatin blends, supporting the fiber-production method. It does not report ultrasonic truncation or the stated fiber length and diameter; Results §3.1 instead reports diameters for the blended JetValve scaffold fibers. No page numbers were supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fiber-spinning techniques can reproduce fine spatial features with higher throughputs and have been used to engineer tissue scaffolds such as heart valves and ventricle models.

    “Because fiber-spinning techniques can reproduce these fine spatial features with higher throughputs, they offer a potential solution and have been used previously to engineer tissue scaffolds, such as heart valves (23) and ventricle models (24).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capulli, A. K., Emmert, M. Y., Pasqualini, F. S., Kehl, D., Caliskan, E., Lind, J. U., Sheehy, S. P., Park, S. J., Ahn, S., Weber, B., Goss, J. A., Hoerstrup, S. P., & Parker, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Parker, Kevin Kit
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
133
Pages
229-241
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606627786
Cited by
112
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (#312659)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (DE-AC52-06NA25396)
  • National Institutes of Health (UH3TR000522)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
heart valve replacement, cell-free tissue engineering, fibrous scaffolds, semilunar valves, scaffold architecture, scaffold mechanical properties, pulmonary valve, sheep model, biocompatibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Heart Valves, Sheep, Tissue Engineering, Biomimetics, Tissue Scaffolds, Nanofibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review