Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid printing of bio-inspired 3D tissue constructs for skin regeneration

Zhou, Feifei, Hong, Yi, Liang, Renjie, Zhang, Xianzhu, Liao, Youguo, Jiang, Deming, Zhang, Jiayan, Sheng, Zixuan, Xie, Chang, Peng, Zhi, Zhuang, Xinhao, Bunpetch, Varitsara, Zou, Yiwei, Huang, Wenwen, Zhang, Qin, Alakpa, Enateri Vera, Zhang, Shufang, Ouyang, Hongwei·2020·Biomaterials

Abstract

It is still a challenge for existing bioprinting technologies to fabricate organs suitable for implantation, mainly due to the inability to recapitulate the organs' complex anatomical structures, mechanical properties, and biological functions. Additionally, the failure to create 3D constructs with interconnected microchannels for long-range mass transportation that limits the clinical applications of 3D printing technologies. Here, a new method was developed to print functional living skin (FLS) using a newly designed biomimetic bioink (GelMA/HA-NB/LAP) and digital light processing (DLP)-based 3D printing technology. The FLS possess interconnected microchannels that facilitates cell migration, proliferation and neo-tissue formation. The GelMA/HA-NB/LAP bioink, composed of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), N-(2-aminoethyl)-4-(4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxy-5-nitrosophenoxy) butanamide (NB) linked hyaluronic acid (HA-NB) and photo-initiator lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP). The bioink demonstrated its rapid gelation kinetics, tunable mechanical properties, good biocompatibility and tissue adhesion. The DLP-based 3D printing technology provides a rapid method to precisely position clusters of human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with high cell viability to form FLS. The FLS promotes skin regeneration and efficient neovascularization by mimicking the physiological structure of natural skin, and it can also be easily handled and implanted onto the wound site due to its strong mechanical and bio-adhesive properties. Moreover, in vivo study demonstrated that the living skin exhibited instant defense function and had superior performance in promoting dermal regeneration with skin appendages in large animals. This study provides a rapid and mass production method of functional living organs for future clinical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120287

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, F., Hong, Y., Liang, R., Zhang, X., Liao, Y., Jiang, D., Zhang, J., Sheng, Z., Xie, C., Peng, Z., Zhuang, X., Bunpetch, V., Zou, Y., Huang, W., Zhang, Q., Alakpa, E. V., Zhang, S., & Ouyang, H.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
258
Pages
120287
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048609120
Cited by
282
References
68
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid printing of bio-inspired 3D tissue constructs for skin regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120287
The paper
Zhou, F., Hong, Y., Liang, R., Zhang, X., Liao, Y., Jiang, D., Zhang, J., Sheng, Z., Xie, C., Peng, Z., Zhuang, X., Bunpetch, V., Zou, Y., Huang, W., Zhang, Q., Alakpa, E. V., Zhang, S., & Ouyang, H. (2020). Rapid printing of bio-inspired 3D tissue constructs for skin regeneration. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120287

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.