Cited by 154Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and Cortisol

Gender-Specific Impact of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling on Stress-Induced Depression-Like Behavior

Open access
Autry, Anita E., Adachi, Megumi, Cheng, Pengfei, Monteggia, Lisa M.·2009·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Major depressive disorder is a leading debilitating disease known to occur at a two-fold higher rate in women than in men. The neurotrophic hypothesis of depression suggests that loss of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may increase susceptibility for depression-like behavior, although direct evidence is lacking.Methods Using the chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) paradigm, we investigated whether male and female mice with inducible BDNF deletion in the forebrain were more susceptible to depression-related behavior.Results We demonstrate that in certain behavioral measures the loss of BDNF lowers the threshold for female mice studied at random throughout estrus to display anxiogenic and anhedonic behaviors after chronic stress compared with wild-type female mice. However, the loss of BDNF in forebrain does not increase the susceptibility to depression-like behavior in male mice.Conclusions These gender differences suggest a role for BDNF in mediating some aspects of depression-related behavior in females.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.007

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditional knockout of BDNF in the forebrain shows the same sex-specific incongruity in stress-induced depressive-like behavior.

    “This conditional knockout of BDNF in the forebrain displayed the same sex-specific incongruity in stress-induced depressive-like behavior (Autry et al. 2009).”

    From Neurotrophic factors and neuroplasticity pathways in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression (2018) · cites this paper as Autry et al. 2009

    The Abstract Results report that forebrain BDNF deletion increased susceptibility to some stress-related behaviors in females but not males. However, the Introduction identifies the mice tested under chronic stress as inducible knockouts and distinguishes that line from the authors’ conditional knockout line; the result is not established for that separate line. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Removal of ovarian hormones in rodents decreases the pro-depressant or anxiogenic effects of stress while simultaneously increasing the negative effects of stress on spatial and non-spatial memory.

    “removal of ovarian hormones decreases the pro–depressant or anxiogenic effects of stress, while simultaneously increasing the negative effects of stress on spatial and non–spatial memory85, 91, 92”

    From Neurobiology of resilience (2012) · cites this paper as [91]

  • BDNF is required for the behavioral actions of antidepressants, and deletion increases vulnerability to depression.

    “Mutant mouse studies also demonstrate that BDNF is required for the behavioral actions of antidepressants, and that deletion increases vulnerability to depression41,42.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]2000 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Washington D.C American Psychiatric Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Autry, A. E., Adachi, M., Cheng, P., & Monteggia, L. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Monteggia, Lisa M.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
84-90
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094662597
Cited by
154
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 070727, R01MH070727)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32‐DA07290, T32DA007290)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, BDNF signaling, depression-like behavior, sex differences, chronic unpredictable mild stress, anxiogenic behavior, anhedonia, estrous cycle, forebrain
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Body Weight, Corticosterone, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Male, Motor Activity, RNA, Messenger, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Sucrose, Signal Transduction, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Hindlimb Suspension, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review