Cited by 143Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesTreatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The Effects of Subanesthetic Ketamine Infusions on Motivation to Quit and Cue-Induced Craving in Cocaine-Dependent Research Volunteers

Open access
Dakwar, Elias, Levin, Frances, Foltin, Richard W., Nunes, Edward V., Hart, Carl L.·2014·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Cocaine dependence involves problematic neuroadaptations that might be responsive to modulation of glutamatergic circuits. This investigation examined the effects of subanesthetic ketamine infusions on motivation for quitting cocaine and on cue-induced craving in cocaine-dependent participants, 24 hours postinfusion.Methods Eight volunteers with active DSM-IV cocaine dependence not seeking treatment or abstinence were entered into this crossover, double-blind trial. Three 52-min intravenous infusions were administered: ketamine (.41 mg/kg or .71 mg/kg) or lorazepam 2 mg, counterbalanced into three orderings in which ketamine .41 mg/kg always preceded the .71 mg/kg dose. Infusions were separated by 48 hours, and assessments occurred at baseline and at 24 hours postinfusion. Outcomes were change between postinfusion and preinfusion values for: 1) motivation to quit cocaine scores with the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment; and 2) sums of visual analogue scale craving ratings administered during cue exposure.Results Compared with the active control lorazepam, a single ketamine infusion (.41 mg/kg) led to a mean 3.9-point gain in University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (p = .012), which corresponds to an approximately 60% increase over preceding values. There was a reduction of comparable magnitude in cue-induced craving (p = .012). A subsequent ketamine infusion (.71 mg/kg) led to further reductions in cue-induced craving compared with the control. Infusions were well-tolerated.Conclusions Subanesthetic ketamine demonstrated promising effects on motivation to quit cocaine and on cue-induced craving, 24 hours postinfusion. Research is needed to expand on these preliminary results and to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention in clinical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.009

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cravings were further decreased with a subsequent ketamine infusion of 0.71 mg/kg.

    “and that cravings were further decreased with a subsequent ketamine infusion (0.71 mg/kg) [147]”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [147]

  • In a small randomized controlled trial of eight participants, an initial ketamine dose of 0.41 mg/kg reduced cue-induced craving at 24 h post-infusion.

    “a small, randomized, controlled trial (n = 8) found that an initial dose (0.41 mg/kg) of ketamine reduced cue-induced craving at 24 h post-infusion”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [147]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Miller WR Rollnick S 2012 Motivational Interviewing, Third Edition: Preparing People for Change New York Guilford Publications, Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dakwar, E., Levin, F., Foltin, R. W., Nunes, E. V., & Hart, C. L.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Dakwar, Elias
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
40-46
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056114002
Cited by
143
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA031749-02, DA031771-01, K05DA031749, DA007294-19, DA029647-02, DA031749-01, P50DA009236, DA009236-18, R01DA003476, DA03476-23, K24DA029647, K23DA031771, T32DA007294)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
subanesthetic ketamine, cocaine dependence, motivation to quit, cue-induced craving, glutamatergic circuits, neural adaptation, University of Rhode Island Change Assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Cues, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Infusions, Intravenous, Ketamine, Lorazepam, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Behavior, Addictive, Cross-Over Studies, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review