Cited by 97Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioenergy crop production and management

Identification of Monoraphidium contortum as a promising species for liquid biofuel production

Bogen, Christian, Klassen, Viktor, Wichmann, Julian, Russa, Marco La, Doebbe, Anja, Grundmann, Michael, Uronen, Pauliina, Kruse, Olaf +1 more·2013·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

In this work, 30 microalgae strains from 17 genera were investigated in regard to biomass productivity in photoautotrophic growth conditions, lipid amount, lipid quality and biomass degradability. Six strains could be identified with robust phototrophic growth properties and high biomass productivities equal or above 300 mg l(-1) day(-1). Anaerobic fermentation of the algal biomass was most efficient for the marine members of the genera Dunaliella and Navicula, while biogas production with the freshwater strains generally resulted in lower methane yields. Monoraphidium contortum was identified as promising candidate for liquid biofuel production, characterized by high biomass productivity during maximum growth (maximum increase of 896 mg dry biomass weight (DW) l(-1) day(-1)) and a promising lipid profile. Neutral lipid production was strongly induced in M. contortum by nitrogen deficient conditions and accumulated to up to 20.4±2.2% of DW.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.164

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bogen, C., Klassen, V., Wichmann, J., Russa, M. L., Doebbe, A., Grundmann, M., Uronen, P., Kruse, O., & Mussgnug, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Neste Oil (Finland) (FI)
Corresponding author
Mussgnug, Jan H.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
133
Pages
622-626
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094983270
Cited by
97
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
Monoraphidium contortum, microalgae, liquid biofuels, microalgae productivity, lipid content, neutral lipids, nitrogen deficiency, anaerobic fermentation, biogas production, methane yield, Dunaliella, Navicula, phototrophic growth
MeSH terms
Fatty Acids, Fermentation, Methane, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review