Cited by 341Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Lipid productivity, settling potential and fatty acid profile of 11 microalgal species grown under nitrogen replete and limited conditions

Griffiths, Melinda J., van Hille, Robert P., Harrison, Susan T. L.·2012·Journal of Applied Phycology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10811-011-9723-y

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nitrogen deficiency for Chlorella vulgaris, according to various researchers, is estimated from 0.01 g L−1 NaNO3 to 0.15 g L−1 KNO3 and 0.375 g L−1 NaNO3.

    “Nitrogen deficiency for Chlorella vulgaris, according to various researchers, is estimated from 0.01 g L− 1 NaNO3 [34] to 0.15 g L− 1 KNO3 [93] and 0.375 g L− 1 NaNO3 [109].”
  • The group of leaders in growth rate includes Micractinium sp. ME05 (5.2 day−1), Hindakia tetrachotoma ME03 (4.6 day−1), Scenedesmus sp. ME02 (3.5 day−1), Ettlia oleoabundans (1.69 day−1), Phaeodactylum tricornutum CCMP 2561 (1.63 day−1), Cryptomonas baltica NIVA-5/91 (1.4 day−1), Chlorella vulgaris (1.34 day−1), Tetraselmis suecica (1.32 day−1), Isochrysis sp. (1.32 day−1), Arthrospira platensis (

    “The group of leaders is formed by: Micractinium sp. ME05 (5.2 day− 1), Hindakia tetrachotoma ME03 (4.6 day− 1), Scenedesmus sp. ME02 (3.5 day− 1) [92], Ettlia oleoabundans (1.69 day− 1) [93], Phaeodactylum tricornutum CCMP 2561 (1.63 day− 1), Cryptomonas baltica NIVA-5/91(1.4 day− 1) [94], Chlorella vulgaris (1.34 day− 1), Tetraselmis suecica (1.32 day− 1), Isochrysis sp. (1.32 day− 1) [93], Arth”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, M. J., van Hille, R. P., & Harrison, S. T. L.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Susan T. L.
Venue
Journal of Applied Phycology
Published
2011-10-06
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
989-1001
ISSN
  • 0921-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5176
OpenAlex
W2049865231
Cited by
341
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Phycology (publishedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
microalgae, biodiesel, lipid productivity, nitrogen limitation, fatty acid composition, gravitational sedimentation, microalgae growth rate, Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus, Cylindrotheca fusiformis, Spirulina platensis, Nannochloropsis, Tetraselmis suecica, Chlorophyta, EN 14214

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review