Cited by 60Algal biology and biofuel productionFluid Dynamics and MixingAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Large-scale cultivation of Spirulina in a floating horizontal photobioreactor without aeration or an agitation device

Zhu, Chenba, Zhai, Xiaoqian, Wang, Jinghan, Han, Desen, Li, Yonghai, Xi, Yimei, Tang, Yajie, Chi, Zhanyou·2018·Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

A low-cost floating photobioreactor (PBR) without the use of aeration and/or an agitation device, in which carbon was supplied in the form of bicarbonate and only wave energy was utilized for mixing, was developed in our previous study. Scaling up is a common challenge in the practical application of PBRs and has not yet been demonstrated for this new design. To fill this gap, cultivation of Spirulina platensis was conducted in this study. The results demonstrated that S. platensis had the highest productivity at 0.3 mol L-1 sodium bicarbonate, but the highest carbon utilization (104 ± 2.6%) was obtained at 0.1 mol L-1. Culture of Spirulina aerated with pure oxygen resulted in only minor inhibition of growth, indicating that its productivity will not be significantly reduced even if dissolved oxygen is accumulated to a high level due to intermittent mixing resulting from the use of wave energy. In cultivation using a floating horizontal photobioreactor at the 1.0 m 2 scale, the highest biomass concentration of 2.24 ± 0.05 g L-1 was obtained with a culture depth of 5.0 cm and the highest biomass productivity of 18.9 g m-2 day-1 was obtained with a depth of 10.0 cm. This PBR was scaled up to 10 m 2 (1000 L) with few challenges; biomass concentration and productivity during ocean testing were little different than those at the 1.0 m 2 (100 L) scale. However, the larger PBR had an apparent carbon utilization efficiency of 45.0 ± 2.8%, significantly higher than the 39.4 ± 0.9% obtained at the 1 m 2 scale. These results verified the ease of scaling up floating horizontal photobioreactors and showed their great potential in commercial applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-018-9258-0

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implementation cost of hybrid photobioreactors ranges from 3.91 to 15.08 kUSD/m3, depending on the quality of materials used.

    “Studies indicate that the implementation cost of hybrid photobioreactors ranges from 3.91 to 15.08 kUSD/m3, depending on the quality of the materials used, whereas raceway ponds have much lower costs, in the range of 4–6 kUSD/m3.”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2018

  • Raceway ponds have costs in the range of 4-6 kUSD/m3.

    “Studies indicate that the implementation cost of hybrid photobioreactors ranges from 3.91 to 15.08 kUSD/m3, depending on the quality of the materials used, whereas raceway ponds have much lower costs, in the range of 4–6 kUSD/m3.”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2018

  • Flat-panel photobioreactors can reach up to 150 kUSD/m3.

    “Tubular photobioreactors reach 40–50 kUSD/m3, and flat-panel photobioreactors can reach up to 150 kUSD/m3 (Ramírez-Mérida et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2018).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2018

  • Tubular photobioreactors reach 40-50 kUSD/m3.

    “Tubular photobioreactors reach 40–50 kUSD/m3, and flat-panel photobioreactors can reach up to 150 kUSD/m3 (Ramírez-Mérida et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2018).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, C., Zhai, X., Wang, J., Han, D., Li, Y., Xi, Y., Tang, Y., & Chi, Z.
Affiliations
Dalian University of Technology (CN)
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2018-07-28
Volume
102
Issue
20
Pages
8979-8987
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W2884396324
Cited by
60
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dalian University of Technology (DUT14RC(3)065)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Spirulina platensis, scale-up, oxygen inhibition, carbon use efficiency, biomass productivity, culture depth
MeSH terms
Oxygen, Biomass, Spirulina, Microalgae, Photobioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review