Cited by 116Algal biology and biofuel productionSeaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsAgricultural and Biological Research

Production, extraction and stabilization of lutein from microalga Chlorella sorokiniana MB-1

Chen, Chun-Yen, Jesisca, Hsieh, Chienyan, Lee, Duu-Jong, Chang, Chien-Hsiang, Chang, Jo-Shu·2016·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The efficiencies of extraction and preservation of lutein from microalgae are critical for the success of its commercialization. In this study, lutein was produced by Chlorella sorokiniana MB-1 via semi-batch mixotrophic cultivation. The microalgal biomass with a lutein content of 5.21mg/g was pretreated by bead-beating and high pressure cell disruption methods, and the lutein content was harvested by a reduced pressure extraction method. The effect of pretreatment, pressure, solvent type, extraction time and temperature on lutein recovery was investigated. Using high pressure pretreatment followed by extraction with tetrahydrofuran (THF) as solvent resulted in high lutein recovery efficiencies of 87.0% (20min) and 99.5% (40min) at 850mbar and 25°C. In contrast, using ethanol as the solvent, 86.2% lutein recovery was achieved under 450mbar, 35°C and 40min extraction. The extracted lutein was stabilized in olive oil or sunflower oil with half-lives of 53.1 and 63.8days, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.071

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chen et al. (2016a, b) reported that the use of high pressure followed by extraction with tetrahydrofuran could result in 99.5% lutein recovery from C. sorokiniana.

    “For instance, Chen et al. (2016a, b) reported that the use of high pressure followed by extraction with tetrahydrofuran could result in 99.5% lutein recovery from C. sorokiniana (Chen et al. 2016a, b).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C.-Y., Jesisca, Hsieh, C., Lee, D.-J., Chang, C.-H., & Chang, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
  • National Kaohsiung Normal University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Jo-Shu
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
200
Pages
500-505
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2192216707
Cited by
116
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (103-2221-E-006-190-MY3, MOST104-3113-E-006-003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
Keywords
lutein, Chlorella sorokiniana, microalgae, mixotrophic cultivation, bead beating, lutein extraction, tetrahydrofuran, ethanol extraction, olive oil, sunflower oil, carotenoid recovery
MeSH terms
Olive Oil, Sunflower Oil, Chlorella, Furans, Plant Oils, Pressure, Solvents, Temperature, Lutein, Biomass, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review