Cited by 75Phosphorus and nutrient managementBiofuel production and bioconversionWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Recovery of agricultural nutrients from biorefineries

Carey, Daniel E., Yang, Yu, McNamara, Patrick J., Mayer, Brooke K.·2016·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This review lays the foundation for why nutrient recovery must be a key consideration in design and operation of biorefineries and comprehensively reviews technologies that can be used to recover an array of nitrogen, phosphorus, and/or potassium-rich products of relevance to agricultural applications. Recovery of these products using combinations of physical, chemical, and biological operations will promote sustainability at biorefineries by converting low-value biomass (particularly waste material) into a portfolio of higher-value products. These products can include a natural partnering of traditional biorefinery outputs such as biofuels and chemicals together with nutrient-rich fertilizers. Nutrient recovery not only adds an additional marketable biorefinery product, but also avoids the negative consequences of eutrophication, and helps to close anthropogenic nutrient cycles, thereby providing an alternative to current unsustainable approaches to fertilizer production, which are energy-intensive and reliant on nonrenewable natural resource extraction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.093

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recovering agricultural nutrients from biorefineries for substitution of conventional fertilizers is a challenge for the next few years.

    “Recovering agricultural nutrients from biorefineries, for a substitution of conventional fertilizers is a challenge for the next few years (Carey et al., 2016).”

    From Biorefineries: Achievements and challenges for a bio-based economy (2022) · cites this paper as Carey et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carey, D. E., Yang, Y., McNamara, P. J., & Mayer, B. K.
Affiliations
Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
Mayer, Brooke K.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
215
Pages
186-198
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2291600043
Cited by
75
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Coordination Network
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
nutrient recovery, biorefinery, nitrogen recovery, phosphorus recovery, potassium recovery, agricultural fertilizers, biomass waste valorization, eutrophication prevention, nutrient cycling, biofuels, bio-based chemicals
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Fertilizers, Humans, Phosphates, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Bioreactors, Recycling, Wastewater, Ammonium Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review