Cited by 230Biofuel production and bioconversionBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Techno-economic and profitability analysis of food waste biorefineries at European level

Open access
Cristóbal, Jorge, Caldeira, Carla, Corrado, Sara, Sala, Serenella·2018·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Food waste represents a potential source to produce value-added materials replacing the use of virgin ones. However, the use of food waste as feedstock in biorefineries is still at an early stage of development and studies assessing its economic viability at large scale are lacking in the literature. This paper presents a techno-economic and profitability analysis of four food waste biorefineries that use wastes from tomato, potato, orange, and olive processing as feedstock. The study includes the assessment of potentially available quantities of those waste flows in Europe. Due to the low technology readiness level of this kind of biorefineries, a screening methodology to estimate the investment and manufacturing costs as well as two profitability ratios (the return on investment and the payback time) was adopted. Results show that not all the waste feedstocks have the same potential. The most profitable options are those related to implementing fewer plants, namely concentrating the production and capitalising on economies of scale while being at risk of increasing externalities, e.g. due to logistics of the feedstocks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.016

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Valorization of food waste under the biorefinery framework has recently gained momentum for implementation and achievement of sustainable development goals policies set by the European Union.

    “The valorization of food waste under the biorefinery framework has recently gained momentum for the implementation and achievement of the sustainable development goals policies set by the European Unions (EU), such as the bioeconomy strategy and the circular economy goals of the EU [6,7,8].”
  • The payback time period should be carefully considered in the assessment, as the payback period for other biorefineries in real world implementation ranged between 3 and 15 years.

    “However, the payback time period should be carefully considered in this assessment (the payback period for other biorefineries in the real world implementation ranged between 3 and 15 years) [8].”
  • If the price of lycopene and β-Carotene are assumed to be EUR 40000/kg and EUR 4000/kg, respectively, the biorefinery would be profitable having up to 56 plants installed across Europe.

    “A study carried out by Cristóbal et al. [8] on the techno-economic and profitability analysis of food waste biorefineries at the European level calculated that if the price of lycopene and β-Carotene are assumed to be EUR 40000/kg and EUR 4000/kg, respectively, the biorefinery would be profitable having up to 56 plants installed across Europe.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cristobal, J., Vila, M., Giavini, M., Torres De Matos, C., Manfredi, S., 2016. Prevention of Waste in the Circular Economy: Analysis of Strategies and Identification of Sustainable Targets -The food waste example. EUR 28422; Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; JRC105415; doi:10.2760/ 256208. · DOI
  2. Perry, R.H., Green, D.W., 1999. Perrýs Chemical Engineers' Handbook. The McGraw-Hill.
  3. Pommeret, A., Yang, X., Kwan, T.H., Christoforou, E.A., Fokaides, P.A., Lin, C.S.K., 2017. Food Waste reduction and valorization. In: Morone, P., Papendiek, F., Tartiu, V.E. (Eds.), Chapter 7: techno-economic study and environmental assessment of food waste based biorefinery. Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cristóbal, J., Caldeira, C., Corrado, S., & Sala, S.
Affiliations
European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Sala, Serenella
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
259
Pages
244-252
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789303395
Cited by
230
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
techno-economic analysis, profitability, tomato processing waste, potato processing waste, food waste valorization, economies of scale, return on investment, payback period, technology readiness level
MeSH terms
Europe, Food, Bioreactors, Olea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review