Cited by 933Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures

Open access
Zhao, Ling, Cao, Xinde, Mašek, Ondřej, Zimmerman, Andrew·2013·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of the two main categories of factors determining the yield and properties of biochar, i.e., feedstock properties and production conditions, here represented by the highest treatment temperature (HTT). To achieve this, a wide range of production temperatures (200-650°C) and an extensive set of diverse feedstock (n=12) were used to calculate the sensitivity. The quantitative evaluation was based on statistical analysis of coefficients of variation, and thus derived indices representing the extent of influence of the two factors, i.e., a feedstock-depended heterogeneity (HF) and a temperature-depended heterogeneity (HT). The results showed that both feedstock properties and production conditions are important for determining the yield and properties of biochar, but their respective influence changes with the property or set of properties of interest. The biochar parameters most affected by feedstock properties were e.g., total organic carbon, fixed carbon, and mineral elements of biochar. On the other hand, biochar surface area and pH was mainly influenced by highest treatment temperature. Biochar recalcitrance was mainly determined by production temperature, while the potential total C sequestration (product of recalcitrance and pyrolysis carbon yield) depended more on feedstock. Overall, the work sheds some light on the relative importance of different biochar production process parameters on the final biochar product, which is an important step towards "designed" biochar.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heterogeneous CRD wood with high holocellulose and low lignin promotes tar and gas formation, reducing FC and chemical stability.

    “Heterogeneous CRD wood with high holocellulose and low lignin promotes tar and gas formation, reducing FC and chemical stability [105][106][107].”

    From Pilot-Scale Slow Pyrolysis, Post-Heat Treatment, and Self-Heating Performance of Biochar Fuels Derived from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition (CRD) Wood Waste (2026) · cites this paper as [105]

    Section 3.1 (page not provided) reports that feedstock source affects biochar fixed carbon, which supports the general feedstock-related part of the claim. It does not establish that CRD wood has high holocellulose and low lignin or that this composition promotes tar and gas formation, reducing fixed carbon. Section 3.2 (page not provided) instead identifies production temperature as the dominant control on biochar recalcitrance. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mašek, O., Brownsort, P., Cross, A., Sohi, S., 2011. Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar. Fuel (In press, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.044). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, L., Cao, X., Mašek, O., & Zimmerman, A.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Cao, Xinde
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
256-257
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170156776
Cited by
933
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 3
FWCI
21.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21077072, 21107070)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
biochar, pyrolysis temperature, biochar properties, carbon sequestration, biochar surface area, biochar pH, fixed carbon, mineral elements, carbon yield, sensitivity analysis, coefficient of variation
MeSH terms
Animals, Charcoal, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Manure, Swine, Temperature, Waste Products, Triticum, Carbon Sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review