Cited by 30Algal biology and biofuel productionFluid Dynamics and MixingAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Enhancing microalgal biomass productivity with an optimized flow field generated by double paddlewheels in a flat plate photoreactor with CO2 aeration based on numerical simulation

Open access
Xu, Junchen, Cheng, Jun, Lai, Xin, Zhang, Xiangdong, Yang, Weijuan, Park, Ji-Yeon, Kim, Hyungtaek, Xu, Lihua·2020·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics were used to analyze the flash light effect and CO 2 bubble behavior in an optimized flow field generated by double paddlewheels in a flat plate photoreactor to enhance microalgal biomass productivity. The increased D/w ratio significantly enhanced the average turbulent kinetic energy and flash cycle frequency. However, the effects became weak when the D/w ratio was over 0.67. Appliance of double paddlewheels increased flash cycle frequency from 0.035 to 0.121 Hz and increased light time ratio from 8.3% to 31.5%. Meanwhile, the bubble dynamic behavior was characterized using population balance model. The average bubble size reduced by 24.4% and the bubble rising velocity reduced by 10.6%, which facilitated CO 2 mixing and mass transfer in microalgal solution. Therefore, biomass accumulation of microalgae Chlorella in the photoreactor with double paddlewheels increased by 62.3% under 15% CO 2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123762

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CFD simulations have been employed to optimize hydrodynamic characteristics and aeration rates within photobioreactor systems, enhancing CO2 capture efficiency.

    “Additionally, CFD simulations have been employed to optimize the hydrodynamic characteristics and aeration rates within PBR systems, enhancing CO 2 capture efficiency [145,146].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, J., Cheng, J., Lai, X., Zhang, X., Yang, W., Park, J.-Y., Kim, H., & Xu, L.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (CN)
  • Korea Institute of Energy Research (KR)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Jun
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
314
Pages
123762
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039870587
Cited by
30
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae productivity, flow field optimization, population balance model, bubble size distribution, bubble rise velocity, CO2 mass transfer, Chlorella, turbulent kinetic energy, computational fluid dynamics
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Chlorella, Photobiology, Biomass, Microalgae, Photobioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review