Cited by 44Fluid Dynamics and MixingAlgal biology and biofuel productionGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control

Optimised hydrodynamic parameters for the design of photobioreactors using computational fluid dynamics and experimental validation

Bitog, Jessie Pascual P., Lee, In-Bok, Oh, Hee-Mock, Hong, Se-Woon, Seo, Il-Hwan, Kwon, Kyeong-Seok·2014·Biosystems Engineering

Abstract

A numerical simulation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was utilised to investigate the flow hydrodynamics of cylindrical bubble column type photobioreactors (PBRs) with a 30l culture medium. To establish the reliability of the simulation study, the CFD model was validated using particle image velocimetry (PIV) computed data under various air flow rates. There were 32 simulation cases for the study comprising two PBR designs, four air flow rates and four nozzle size diameters. Hydrodynamic analyses such as % volume of dead zones, average circulation time and turbulence intensity inside the simulated PBRs were evaluated. Results have shown that the most appropriate PBR for microalgae cultivation was a design with internal baffle and an extended cone-shaped bottom section. In addition, the recommended nozzle diameter was found to be 10 mm and a minimum air flow rate of 0.10 vvm. To eliminate dead zones inside the PBR, the flow rate can be slightly increased but should not exceed 0.15 vvm. Practical evaluation through laboratory experiments has further confirmed the results of the study where the biomass concentration of Chlorella vulgaris from the proposed PBR was significantly higher compared to the standard PBR design. Based on the numerical investigation and practical evaluation, the improved PBR can be seen to be more effective in culturing microalgae particularly for larger scale mass production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.03.006

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bitog, J. P. P., Lee, I.-B., Oh, H.-M., Hong, S.-W., Seo, I.-H., & Kwon, K.-S.
Affiliations
  • Nueva Vizcaya State University (PH)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KR)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Lee, In-Bok
Venue
Biosystems Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
122
Pages
42-61
ISSN
1537-5110 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045442042
Cited by
44
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biosystems Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • KRIBB Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Keywords
photobioreactor design, bubble column photobioreactor, hydrodynamics, microalgae cultivation, Chlorella vulgaris, air flow rate, nozzle diameter, internal baffles, dead zone, circulation time, turbulence intensity, particle image velocimetry validation, biomass concentration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review