Cited by 16Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Template-free prediction of a new monotopic membrane protein fold and assembly by AlphaFold2

Open access
Gulsevin, Alican, Han, Bing, Porta, Jason C., Mchaourab, Hassane S., Meiler, Jens, Kenworthy, Anne K.·2023·Biophysical Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

AlphaFold2 (AF2) has revolutionized the field of protein structural prediction. Here, we test its ability to predict the tertiary and quaternary structure of a previously undescribed scaffold with new folds and unusual architecture, the monotopic membrane protein caveolin-1 (CAV1). CAV1 assembles into a disc-shaped oligomer composed of 11 symmetrically arranged protomers, each assuming an identical new fold, and contains the largest parallel β-barrel known to exist in nature. Remarkably, AF2 predicts both the fold of the protomers and the interfaces between them. It also assembles between seven and 15 copies of CAV1 into disc-shaped complexes. However, the predicted multimers are energetically strained, especially the parallel β-barrel. These findings highlight the ability of AF2 to correctly predict new protein folds and oligomeric assemblies at a granular level while missing some elements of higher-order complexes, thus positing a new direction for the continued development of deep-learning protein structure prediction approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.011

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulsevin, A., Han, B., Porta, J. C., Mchaourab, H. S., Meiler, J., & Kenworthy, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Meiler, Jens
  • Kenworthy, Anne K.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
122
Issue
11
Pages
2041-2052
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308559963
Cited by
16
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NHLBI (R01HL122010, R01 HL144131)
  • NIGMS (R01GM080403, R01GM129261)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
caveolin-1, protein fold prediction, quaternary structure prediction, oligomerization, protein-protein interfaces, deep learning protein structure prediction, AlphaFold2
MeSH terms
Furylfuramide, Membrane Proteins, Protein Conformation, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Protein Subunits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review