Cited by 194Advanced Glycation End Products researchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Hippocampal RAGE immunoreactivity in early and advanced Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Miller, Miles C., Tavares, Rosemarie, Johanson, Conrad E., Hovanesian, Virginia, Donahue, John E., Gonzalez, Liliana, Silverberg, Gerald D., Stopa, Edward G.·2008·Brain Research

Abstract

Microvascular accumulation and neuronal overproduction of amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta) are pathologic features of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we examined the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE), a multi-ligand receptor found in both neurons and cerebral microvascular endothelia that binds Abeta. RAGE expression was assessed in aged controls (n = 6), patients with early AD-like pathology (n = 6), and severe, Braak V-VI AD (n = 6). Human hippocampi were stained with a specific polyclonal antibody directed against RAGE (Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ). Immunoreactivity was localized in both neurons and cerebral endothelial cells. Quantitative image-analyses were performed on grayscale images to assess the total surface area of endothelial RAGE immunoreaction product in cross sections of cerebral microvessels (5-20 microm). Confocal images were acquired for confirmation of RAGE immunoreactivity in both microvessels and neurons by coupling RAGE with CD-31 and neurofilament, respectively. A significant increase in endothelial RAGE immunoreactivity was found in severe Braak V-VI AD patients when compared to aged controls (p < 0.001), and when compared to patients with early AD pathology (p = 0.0125). In addition, a significant increase in endothelial RAGE immunoreactivity was witnessed when comparing aged controls having no reported AD pathology with patients having early AD-like pathology (p = 0.038). Our data suggest that microvascular RAGE levels increase in conjunction with the onset of AD, and continue to increase linearly as a function of AD pathologic severity (p < 0.0001).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.124

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RAGE expression at the blood-brain barrier is increased in Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease models.

    “Its expression at the BBB is increased in AD and AD models (134, 152, 410).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [410]

    The Discussion reports increased hippocampal microvascular RAGE immunoreactivity in human AD patients and describes changes in RAGE expression at the BBB. The paper does not report an increase at the BBB in AD models; its Introduction mentions animal models only in general terms. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LRP1 levels at the blood-brain barrier are diminished in Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease models, contributing to Aβ accumulation in the brain.

    “LRP1 levels at the BBB are diminished in AD and AD models contributing to A 𝛃 accumulation in the brain (137, 152, 410, 535).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [410]

    The Introduction describes LRP-1 as transporting Aβ out of the brain across the blood–brain barrier, and the Discussion links altered Aβ transport to accumulation in AD. Neither section reports diminished LRP-1 levels in AD patients or AD models; the study measured RAGE, not LRP-1. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RAGE expression is increased in Alzheimer's disease brain endothelium and mural cells.

    “In contrast to LRP1, expression of RAGE, a major A 𝛃 influx receptor, is increased in AD brain endothelium and mural cells (134, 152, 410)”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [410]

    The Results (Quantitative immunohistochemical analyses; page unavailable) report significantly increased RAGE immunoreactivity in hippocampal microvascular endothelium in AD compared with aged controls. The paper does not report a corresponding finding for mural cells, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RAGE expression levels are correlated with the severity of Alzheimer's disease as indicated by clinical score of the amyloid plaque or tangle.

    “The levels of expression of RAGE are correlated to the severity of the disease indicated by clinical score of the amyloid plaque or tangle [45,47].”
  • Higher levels of RAGE expression are found in neuronal, microglial, and endothelial cells in Alzheimer's disease patients compared with age-matched non-demented controls.

    “AGEs and the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) can play an important role in AD pathogenesis as higher levels of RAGE expression in neuronal, microglial, and endothelial cells in patients with AD compared with age-matched, non- demented controls are found [43,44,45,46].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, M. C., Tavares, R., Johanson, C. E., Hovanesian, V., Donahue, J. E., Gonzalez, L., Silverberg, G. D., & Stopa, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Rhode Island Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Stopa, Edward G.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
1230
Pages
273-280
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043890234
Cited by
194
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Brown University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG027910)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
receptor for advanced glycation end products, RAGE, Alzheimer's disease, hippocampus, cerebral microvasculature, amyloid-beta, Braak staging, disease severity, endothelial cells, CD31, neurofilaments
MeSH terms
Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Female, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microcirculation, Middle Aged, Receptors, Immunologic, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review