Cited by 58Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Vibrotactile detection thresholds for chest skin of amputees following targeted reinnervation surgery

Schultz, Aimee E., Marasco, Paul D., Kuiken, Todd A.·2009·Brain Research

Abstract

Recent advances in the design of prosthetic arms have helped upper limb amputees achieve greater levels of function. However, control of upper limb prostheses is limited by the lack of sensory feedback to the user. Targeted reinnervation, a novel surgical technique for amputees, offers the potential for returning this lost sensation. During targeted reinnervation surgery, truncated nerves are directed to reinnervate new muscle and skin sites. Contractions of reinnervated muscles generate electrical signals that are used to control prosthetic arms. In addition, stimulation of reinnervated skin is perceived on the missing limb. Vibration detection thresholds were measured at four frequencies on the reinnervated chest skin of three shoulder-level amputees following targeted reinnervation surgery. Thresholds were also measured on the contralateral chest and arm skin of these amputees, as well as on the chest and arm skin of a control population. Vibrations applied to reinnervated skin were perceived at various locations on the missing arm and hand. Thresholds for the reinnervated chest skin were generally within the range of values measured on the chests of the control population. For the two unilateral amputees, these thresholds were similar to measures on their contralateral chests, but greater than measures on their contralateral hands. Targeted reinnervation appears to result in near-normal vibration-detection ability with respect to the target tissue, suggesting the functional reinnervation of mechanoreceptors by the reinnervating afferents. The functional limb sensation following targeted reinnervation could be used to provide prosthesis users with a sense of touch.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.039

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using TR, sensation in the hand evoked by reinnervated chest skin along with touch, temperature, pain, and limited graded force discrimination have been demonstrated.

    “Using TR, sensation in the hand as evoked by a reinnervated chest skin along with other senses like touch, temperature, pain, and a limited graded force discrimination have been demonstrated (Kuiken et al., 2007b; Marasco et al., 2009, 2011; Schultz et al., 2009; Sensinger et al., 2009).”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Schultz et al., 2009

  • The sensitivity of the reinnervated skin is comparable to that of intact skin and the elicited sensations are natural.

    “However, the sensitivity of the reinnervated skin is comparable to that of intact skin and the elicited sensations are natural (Marasco et al. 2009;Schultz et al., 2009).”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Schultz et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schultz, A. E., Marasco, P. D., & Kuiken, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
Corresponding author
Schultz, Aimee E.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
1251
Pages
121-129
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037040885
Cited by
58
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
vibration perception threshold, upper limb amputees, sensory feedback, prosthetic control, mechanoreceptors, reinnervation, somatosensory feedback
MeSH terms
Adult, Amputation Stumps, Amputees, Arm, Artificial Limbs, Female, Humans, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Middle Aged, Nerve Regeneration, Peripheral Nerves, Physical Stimulation, Sensory Thresholds, Skin, Thorax, Touch, Vibration, Neurosurgical Procedures, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review