Cited by 123Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychometric Methodologies and TestingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A psychometric evaluation of the social skills rating system in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Van der Oord, S., Van der Meulen, E.M., Prins, P.J.M., Oosterlaan, J., Buitelaar, J.K., Emmelkamp, P.M.G.·2005·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The social skills rating system (SSRS) was developed to assess social skills of children, as observed by multiple raters (teacher, parent, child). Studies of the SSRS have been conducted with handicapped, mentally retarded and learning disabled children. No studies have reported the psychometric properties of the SSRS in a clinical ADHD sample. This is important, because deficient social functioning is associated with ADHD. The present study assesses the psychometric properties of the teacher, parent and child versions of the SSRS in children with ADHD (n = 123), and normal controls (n = 239). Also, the social skills of children with ADHD, as rated on the SSRS were examined. Results support the factor structure and internal consistency of the original SSRS-teacher version. Moreover, support was found for 3 out of 4 scales of the SSRS-parent version. The factor structure of the SSRS-child version could not be replicated. An explanatory factor analysis on the SSRS-child version yielded two factors. Evidence was found for discriminative ability of the SSRS between normal controls and children with ADHD. Finally, informant agreement between raters was found to be poor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.004

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van der Oord, S., Van der Meulen, E. M., Prins, P. J. M., Oosterlaan, J., Buitelaar, J. K., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
733-746
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087159445
Cited by
122
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
Social Skills Rating System, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, social skills assessment, psychometric properties, factor structure, internal consistency, informant agreement, teacher ratings, parent ratings, child self-report, social functioning
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review