Cited by 241Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Adolescent outcome of boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and social disability: Results from a 4-year longitudinal follow-up study.

Greene, Ross W., Biederman, Joseph, Faraone, Stephen V., Sienna, Melissa, Garcia-Jetton, Jennifer·1997·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

IQ-achievement discrepancy methodology similar to that used in defining learning disabilities has recently been used to identify a subset of boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) evidencing marked impairment in social functioning. In this study, 2 issues were examined: (a) What is the longitudinal outcome of boys with ADHD identified at baseline as "socially disabled"? (b) Is social disability at baseline a significant predictor of severe long-term outcomes (such as substance use disorders) in boys with ADHD? If so, are its predictive relationships accounted for by conditions that are comorbid with ADHD? Results showed that, at follow-up, boys with ADHD who also had social disability evidenced significantly higher rates of mood, anxiety, disruptive, and substance use disorders, compared with nonsocially disabled boys with ADHD and comparison boys without ADHD. Findings also showed that social disability at baseline in boys with ADHD was a significant predictor of later conduct disorder and most substance use disorders after baseline mood and conduct disorders and behavior checklist ratings of aggressive behavior and attention problems were controlled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.65.5.758

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene, R. W., Biederman, J., Faraone, S. V., Sienna, M., & Garcia-Jetton, J.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1997-10
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
758-767
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2020545916
Cited by
241
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01mh041314-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-41314-01A2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, social dysfunction, substance use disorders, conduct disorder, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, comorbidities, aggression, longitudinal follow-up, boys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aggression, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personality Development, Social Behavior Disorders, Socialization, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review