Cited by 176Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Recurrence of major depressive disorder and its predictors in the general population: results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)

Open access
Hardeveld, F., Spijker, J., De Graaf, R., Nolen, W. A., Beekman, A. T. F.·2013·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of the risk of recurrence after recovery from major depressive disorder (MDD) in the general population is scarce. Method: Data were derived from 687 subjects in the general population with a lifetime DSM-III-R diagnosis of MDD but without a current major depressive episode (MDE) or dysthymia. Participants had to be at least 6 months in remission, and were recruited from The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS), using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Recency and severity of the last MDE were assessed retrospectively at baseline. Recurrence of MDD was measured prospectively during the 3-year follow-up. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to measure time to recurrence. Determinants of time to recurrence were analyzed using proportional hazard models. Results: The estimated cumulative recurrence of MDD was 13.2% at 5 years, 23.2% at 10 years and 42.0% at 20 years. In bivariate analysis, the following variables predicted a shorter time to recurrence: younger age, younger age of onset, higher number of previous episodes, a severe last depressive episode, negative youth experiences, ongoing difficulties before recurrence and high neuroticism. Multivariably, younger age, a higher number of previous episodes, a severe last depressive episode, negative youth experiences and ongoing difficulties remained significant. Conclusions: In this community sample, the long-term risk of recurrence was high, but lower than that found in clinical samples. Subjects who had had an MDE had a long-term vulnerability for recurrence. Factors predicting recurrence included illness- and stress-related factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291712002395

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using cultural idioms and other cultural concepts has been central to the development and adaptation of psychological interventions for depression that are culturally acceptable and reduce risk of stigmatization.

    “Using these idioms and other cultural concepts has been central to the development and adaptation of psychological interventions for depression that are culturally acceptable and reduce risk of stigmatization. 118-121”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ormel H (1980). Problems with life or a stressful life [in Dutch]. Thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  2. Wittchen HU (1994). Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-CIDI : a critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research 28, 57-84.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardeveld, F., Spijker, J., De Graaf, R., Nolen, W. A., & Beekman, A. T. F.
Affiliations
  • Pro Persona (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Hardeveld, F.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2012-10-31
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
39-48
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2160377774
Cited by
176
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • European Commission
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Servier
  • Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, recurrence, remission, risk factors, age of onset, episode severity, neuroticism, community sample, Nemesis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Personality, Predictive Value of Tests, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review