Cited by 23Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Is less more? A randomized comparison of home practice time in a mind-body program

Open access
Greenberg, Jonathan, Braun, Tosca D., Schneider, Marissa L., Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy, Conboy, Lisa A., Schifano, Elizabeth D., Park, Crystal, Lazar, Sara W.·2018·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Home practice is a major component of mind-body programs, yet little is known about how to optimize the amount of prescribed home practice in order to achieve an effective "dose" of practice while minimizing participant burden. This study tested how varying the amount of home practice in a mind-body program impacts compliance and stress reduction, and whether prescribing a flexible home practice schedule increases compliance. Eighty-four stressed participants undergoing a 12-week yoga program were randomized to low, medium, and high home practice conditions. The medium condition allowed participants the flexibility to choose one of two amounts of practice each day. The low practice group exhibited the highest compliance (91%) compared to the medium and low practice groups (∼60%), but exhibited the lowest total practice time, and did not significantly reduce stress. The high practice group was the only group to achieve significant stress-reduction, which was maintained 12 weeks post program. Prescribing a flexible home practice schedule did not increase compliance. Results suggest that prescribing higher practice doses may maximize practice time and symptom reduction despite lower compliance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.003

Cites

26 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For mindfulness-based interventions, there is a strong relation between degree of mindfulness practice at home and amount of improvement in mindfulness and wellbeing.

    “Further, for mindfulness-based interventions, there is a strong relation between degree of mindfulness practice at home and amount of improvement in mindfulness and wellbeing (Carmody & Baer, 2009; Greenberg et al., 2018; Parsons et al., 2017).”

    From Parent, child, and family outcomes following Acceptance And Commitment Therapy for parents of autistic children: A randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as Greenberg et al., 2018

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports a statistically significant association between home practice and outcomes, but describes it as weak (r=.26) and says findings across studies are mixed—not strong. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports stress reduction in the high-practice group, but does not establish a strong relation with improvement in both mindfulness and wellbeing. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Deci EL (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
  2. Guéguen N, & Pascual A (2000). Evocation of freedom and compliance: The "but you are free of…" technique. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5(18), 1– 7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenberg, J., Braun, T. D., Schneider, M. L., Finkelstein-Fox, L., Conboy, L. A., Schifano, E. D., Park, C., & Lazar, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, Jonathan
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
111
Pages
52-56
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894680263
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R34-AT007197, R01-AG-048351)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
home practice, yoga, compliance, stress reduction, participant burden, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Mind-Body Therapies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review