Cited by 149Disability Rights and RepresentationAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityArchitecture, Modernity, and Design

Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment

Open access
Heylighen, Ann, Van der Linden, Valerie, Van Steenwinkel, Iris·2017·Building and Environment

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. W.F.E. Preiser, E. Ostroff (Eds.), Universal Design Handbook, McGraw-Hill, 2001.
  2. R. Coleman, The case for inclusive design -an overview, in: Proceedings of the 12th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Toronto, August 15-19, 1994, International Ergonomics Association.
  3. M. Basnak, B. Tauke, S. Weidemann, Universal Design in Architectural Education: Who is Doing It? How is It Being Done?, in: A. Aksamija, J. Haymaker, A. Aminmansour (Eds.), Future of Architectural Research. Proceedings of the Architectural Research Centers Consortium ARCC 2015 Conference, Perkins+Will, 2015, pp.670-678.
  4. National Disability Authority, UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Council of Europe DisabilityActionPlan, undated. Cited in: E. Ostroff, Universal Design: An Evolving Paradigm, Universal design handbook, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2011, pp.1.3-1-11.
  5. E. Ostroff, Universal Design: An Evolving Paradigm, Universal design handbook, 2nd ed. McGraw- Hill, 2011, pp.1.3-1-11.
  6. G. Marquardt, P. Schmieg, (2009) Dementia-friendly architecture, American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias 24(4) 2009 333-340.
  7. L. Stam, Social engagement in design: A new perspective. Unpublished master thesis, 2015.
  8. H.N.J. Schifferstein, P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience. Elsevier, 2008.
  9. D.B. Gray, M. Gould, J.E. Bickenbach, Environmental barriers and disability. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 20(1) 2003 29-37.
  10. A. Pedersen, C. Crouch, Introducing Universal Design to a Colonial Context, in: J. Christophersen (Ed.), Universal Design, Norwegian State Housing Bank, 2002, pp. 289-314.
  11. A. Declercq, De complexe zoektocht tussen orde en chaos. Een sociologische studie naar de differentiatie in de institutionele zorgregimes voor dementerende ouderen. [The complex search between order and chaos. A sociological study of the differentiation in the institutional care regimes for older people with dementia]. PhD Dissertation. KU Leuven, 2000.
  12. J. Pallasmaa, The eyes of the skin, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  13. P. Welch, S. Jones. 2001. Advances in universal design education in the United States, Universal design handbook, 2001, pp. 51.1-51.24.
  14. J.M. Franz, G. Bitner, N. Wright, C. Gillett, R. Hannaford, Inclusive universal design practice and activism: A case study, in: M. Narikawa (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference: Universal Design, International Association for Universal Design, 2010.
  15. A. Heylighen, P.W. Vermeersch, Mobilizing disability experience to inform architectural education. Lessons learned from a field experiment, Raising Awareness for the Societal and Environmental Role of Engineering and (Re)Training Engineers for Participatory Design, Engineering 4 Society, Leuven, June 18-19, 2015, IEEE, pp. 51-58.
  16. N. Crilly, A. Maier, P.J. Clarkson, Representing artefacts as media, International Journal of Design 2(3) 2008 15-27.
  17. M. Dujardin, Learning from practice: Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) as a UD teaching tool at Sint-Lucas Architecture, Belgium, Proceedings of Include 2011, Royal College of Art, Helen Hamlyn Centre, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heylighen, A., Van der Linden, V., & Van Steenwinkel, I.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Heylighen, Ann
Venue
Building and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
114
Pages
507-517
ISSN
0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2565747647
Cited by
149
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Building and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO)
  • KU Leuven Research Fund (OT/12/051, PDM/16/091)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture, Modernity, and Design
Keywords
inclusive design, built environment, universal design, aging society, sustainable design, spatial quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review