Cited by 153Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Systematic review of studies on telemonitoring of patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis

Clarke, Malcolm, Shah, Anila, Sharma, Urvashi·2011·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of large, well-conducted randomised trials designed to evaluate the effectiveness of telemonitoring on patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Two people reviewed 125 articles independently and selected 13 articles for final review. These studies concerned 3480 patients. The follow-up period of the studies was 3–15 months. Pooled estimate results showed that there was an overall reduction in all-cause mortality ( P = 0.02). There was no overall reduction in all-cause hospital admission ( P = 0.84), although there was a reduction in CHF hospital admission ( P = 0.0004). There was no reduction in all-cause emergency admission ( P = 0.67). There was no significant difference in length of stay in hospital, medication adherence or cost. Telemonitoring in conjunction with nurse home visiting and specialist unit support can be effective in the clinical management of patients with CHF and help to improve their quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2010.100113

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another review focused on telemonitoring found no reduction in all-cause hospital admission for chronic heart failure from six studies (risk ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.0).

    “Another review which focused on telemonitoring, pooled results for chronic heart failure from six studies for all cause hospital admission did not find a reduction for this outcome (risk ratio 1.0, 95% C.I. 0.9 to 1.0) [45].”
  • That review found a significant reduction in chronic heart failure related hospital admission for telemonitoring (risk ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9).

    “However, for telemonitoring for chronic heart failure related hospital admission there was a significant reduction (risk ratio 0.7, 95% C.I. 0.6 to 0.9).”
  • Another review comparing telemonitoring to usual care found a reduction in all-cause mortality based on 10 studies, relative risk 0.8 (95% CI 0.6 to 1.0).

    “In another review which specifically only included trial arms that compared telemonitoring to usual care and excluded arms with nurse only support or telephone support, reviewers also found a reduction in all-cause mortality based on 10 studies, relative risk 0.8 (95% C.I. 0.6 to 1.0) [45]”
  • In another review of heart failure, some studies included SF-36 and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure scores, both improved, but other included studies did not demonstrate an improvement in quality of life.

    “In another review of heart failure some studies included scores on SF-36 and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score, both of these improved, however the other included studies did not demonstrate an improvement in quality of life [45].”
  • Nine reviews analyzed telehealth interventions for heart failure.

    “A total of 9 reviews analyzed telehealth interventions for heart failure [16,20,28,55-60].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, M., Shah, A., & Sharma, U.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Malcolm
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2011-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
7-14
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2000438169
Cited by
152
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (TS/H000100/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, congestive heart failure, all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, emergency admissions, length of hospital stay, medication adherence, health care costs, nurse home visiting, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review