Cited by 121Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Evaluating the Evidence Base for the Use of Home Telehealth Remote Monitoring in Elderly with Heart Failure

Dang, Stuti, Dimmick, Susan, Kelkar, Geetanjali·2009·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Information and communication technology offers promise for better coordination of care for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINHAL databases were searched for evidence on remote monitoring of patients with heart failure (HF). The search was restricted to randomized controlled trials using either automated monitoring of signs and symptoms or automated physiologic monitoring. For this review, telephone-based monitoring of signs and symptoms was not considered remote monitoring. Studies were also excluded if they did not present outcomes related to healthcare utilization. Nine studies met selection criteria, with interventions that varied greatly. Four three-arm studies directly compared the effectiveness of two different interventions to usual care. Six of the nine studies suggested a 27%-40% reduction in overall admissions. Two two-arm studies demonstrated a 40%-46% reduction in HF-related admissions while two other three-arm studies showed similar trends; however, this was not statistically significant. Three of nine studies suggested a significant reduction in mortality (30%-67%) and three studies showed significant reduction in healthcare utilization costs. Two studies suggested a 53%-62% reduction in bed days of care. Two studies showed significant reduction in the number of Emergency Department visits. Three two-arm studies and one three-arm study demonstrated significant overall improvement in outcomes with use of telemonitoring. Available data suggest that telemonitoring is a promising strategy. More data are needed to determine the ideal patient population, technology, and parameters, frequency and duration of telemonitoring, and the exact combination of case management and close monitoring that would assure consistent and improved outcomes with cost reductions in HF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2009.0028

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dang, S., Dimmick, S., & Kelkar, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Bruce W. Carter VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2009-10
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
783-796
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2153816875
Cited by
121
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
congestive heart failure, remote monitoring, home telehealth, elderly patients, hospital readmission, health care utilization, mortality reduction, emergency department visits, health care costs, case management
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Heart Failure, Home Care Services, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Case Management, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review