Cited by 30Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Usability and Utility of a Computerized Cognitive-Behavioral Self-Help Program for Public Speaking Anxiety

Anderson, Page, Zimand, Elana, Schmertz, Stefan K., Ferrer, Mirtha·2007·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2006.02.006

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, P., Zimand, E., Schmertz, S. K., & Ferrer, M.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Page
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
198-207
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066533018
Cited by
30
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
public speaking anxiety, social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, CD-ROM, virtual audience, exposure therapy, psychoeducation, therapist contact, computer usability, treatment satisfaction, anxiety reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review