Cited by 112Digital Mental Health InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The effectiveness of self-administered treatments: a practice-friendly review of the research

Mains, Jennifer A., Scogin, Forrest R.·2003·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Self-administered treatments are a cost-effective way to treat a broad spectrum of people. This article focuses on the existing research of self-administered treatments and their effectiveness when integrated with ongoing practice or when implemented alone. Evidence for their effectiveness is mixed; self-help has been proven successful in the treatment of depression, mild alcohol abuse, and anxiety disorders. It has proven less successful for smoking cessation and moderate to severe alcohol abuse. When determining whether self-administered treatment is appropriate, individual characteristics and attitude as well as the nature and severity of the problem should be taken into consideration. In addition, because many self-help treatments have not been evaluated, caution should be exercised when implementing self-administered treatment, and progress should be carefully monitored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.10145

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-help interventions have enormous potential to maximize scalability because of their low cost and flexibility in terms of the times in which they can be used, and their ability to overcome system-related barriers and attitudinal barriers.

    “Self-help interventions have enormous potential to maximize scalability because of their low cost and flexibility in terms of the times in which they can be used, and their ability to overcome system-related barriers (e.g. long waiting list) and attitudinal barriers (e.g. embarrassment, preference for self-management) (Czyz et al., 2013; Levin et al., 2016; Mains and Scogin, 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mains, J. A., & Scogin, F. R.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Scogin, Forrest R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-27
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
237-246
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2078970710
Cited by
112
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
self-administered therapy, self-help, treatment effectiveness, depression, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorders, smoking cessation, treatment integration, individual characteristics, treatment monitoring
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Bibliotherapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depression, Humans, Self Care, Smoking, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review