Cited by 367Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsArt Therapy and Mental HealthPsychological Treatments and Assessments

A meta‐analysis of bibliotherapy studies

Open access
Marrs, Rick W.·1995·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Used meta‐analysis to examine the efficacy of bibliotherapy. Bibliotherapy treatments were compared to control groups and therapist‐administered treatments. The mean estimated effect size ( d ) of the 70 samples analyzed was +0.565. There was no significant differences between the effects of bibliotherapy and therapist‐administered treatments, as well as no significant erosion of effect sizes at follow‐up. Bibliotherapy did appear more effective for certain problem types (assertion training, anxiety, and sexual dysfunction) than for others (weight loss, impulse control, and studying problems). Overall, the amount of therapist contact during bibliotherapy did not seem to relate to effectiveness, but there was evidence that certain problem types (weight loss and anxiety reduction) responded better with increased therapist contact. Recommendations for future research were given, especially for more research on the commonly purchased books and moderator analyses by personality type and reading ability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02507018

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marrs, R. W.
Affiliations
Concordia University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Marrs, Rick W.
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
843-870
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W1993712392
Cited by
366
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
bibliotherapy, self-help books, treatment efficacy, effect size, assertiveness training, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, weight loss, impulse control, therapist contact, follow-up outcomes
MeSH terms
Bibliotherapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review