Cited by 47Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Issues in the design of a randomized noninferiority clinical trial of telemental health psychotherapy for rural combat veterans with PTSD

Morland, Leslie A., Greene, Carolyn J., Rosen, Craig, Mauldin, Patrick D., Frueh, B. Christopher·2009·Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract

This methodological article provides a description of the design, methods, and rationale of the first prospective, noninferiority designed randomized clinical trial evaluating the clinical and cost implications of delivering an evidence-based cognitive-behavioral group intervention specifically treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with a trauma-focused intervention via video teleconferencing (VTC). PTSD is a prevalent mental health problem found among returning Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) military populations. These returning military personnel often live in rural areas and therefore have limited access to care and specialized psychological treatments. In the field of mental health, telemental health (TMH) technology has introduced a potential solution to the persistent problem of access to care in remote areas. This study is enrolling approximately 126 returning veterans with current combat-related PTSD who are receiving services through the Veteran Administration (VA) mental health care clinics on 4 Hawaiian Islands. Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), an empirically supported manualized treatment for PTSD, is being delivered across 9 cohorts. Participants are assigned to either the experimental VTC condition or the in-person control condition. Assessments measuring clinical, process, and cost outcomes are being conducted at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 3 and 6 months post-treatment. The study employs a noninferiority design to determine if the group treatment delivered via VTC is as good as the traditional in-person modality. In addition, a cost analysis will be performed in order to compare the cost of the 2 modalities. Novel aspects of this trial and specific challenges are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.006

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morland, L. A., Greene, C. J., Rosen, C., Mauldin, P. D., & Frueh, B. C.
Affiliations
  • National Center for PTSD (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Morland, Leslie A.
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
513-522
ISSN
1551-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076952499
Cited by
47
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
telemental health, post-traumatic stress disorder, combat veterans, cognitive processing therapy, videoconferencing, cost analysis, group therapy
MeSH terms
Hawaii, Humans, Mental Health Services, Prospective Studies, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Telemedicine, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review