Cited by 228Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study

King, Ronnel B.·2015·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.002

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
King, R. B.
Affiliations
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
King, Ronnel B.
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
42
Pages
26-38
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968842809
Cited by
228
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
16.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
relatedness, adolescent students, academic engagement, disaffection, academic performance, student well-being, positive and negative affect, high school students, Filipino students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review