The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence of a continuum structure of academic self-determination: A two-study test using a bifactor-ESEM representation of academic motivation
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent studies conducted in the work (Fernet et al., 2020;Howard et al., 2018) and educational (Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017) areas have demonstrated that bifactor exploratory structural equation models (bifactor-ESEM; Morin, Arens, & Marsh, 2016) made it possible to simultaneously obtain a direct estimate of employees' global levels of self-determined work motivation and an equally direct”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“These studies showed that participants' global levels of self-determination tended to be the key component responsible for associations with a variety of covariates, underscoring the importance of considering global levels of self-determination in future research on work motivation.”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“However, they also supported the additional value of considering the specific regulation factors in prediction.”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“However, these prior investigations also failed to explicitly take into account the levels of global self-determination which have been shown, in previous variable-centered studies (Howard et al., 2018;Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017), to represent a much stronger predictor of outcomes than the specific motivation factors reflecting the unique quality of employees' work motivation beyond their”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Recent research has shown that it was possible for SDT to “have its cake and eat it too” (Howard et al., 2018;Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017), showing that levels of global selfdetermination reflecting the self-determination continuum were able to co-exist with types of motivation retaining a meaningful level of specificity and explanatory power.”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“The current study adds to this body of research by supporting this dual nature of workers' motivation (Fernet et al., 2020;Howard et al., 2018;Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017).”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Self-citationThe "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Self-citationIntrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Self-citationIntrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,403
Self-citationProbabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests
Psychology, M. (1961) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(61)80061-2 · Cited by 6,936
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 · Cited by 6,691
Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/a0012801 · Cited by 6,664
Self-citationA scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire
Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700021644 · Cited by 5,637
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ahmed, 2006, A structural model of self-concept, autonomous motivation and academic performance in cross-cultural perspective, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4, 551
- Losier, G. F. (1994). Une analyse motivationnelle de la persévérance aux études avancées [analysis of graduate student persistence]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 · Cited by 6,037
Self-citationStudent Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620966789 · Cited by 1,001
Self-citationRyan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000194 · Cited by 536
Self-citationAl-Jubari, I., Hassan, A., & Liñán, F. (2018) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-018-0529-0 · Cited by 354
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2630-2 · Cited by 424
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Gagné, M., Vallerand, R. J., Losier, G. F., & Ryan, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Concordia University (CA)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
- Université de Moncton (CA)
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Litalien, David
- Venue
- Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 67-82
- ISSN
- 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2733060449
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 21.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- academic self-determination, academic motivation, self-determination theory, bifactor ESEM, Academic Motivation Scale, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation, relative autonomy, student satisfaction, dropout intention, ill-being, vitality, undergraduate and graduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
