CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 163Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Evidence of a continuum structure of academic self-determination: A two-study test using a bifactor-ESEM representation of academic motivation

Open access
Litalien, David, Morin, Alexandre J.S., Gagné, Marylène, Vallerand, Robert J., Losier, Gaëtan F., Ryan, Richard M.·2017·Contemporary Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.010

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies in work and educational areas have demonstrated that bifactor-ESEM makes it possible to simultaneously obtain a direct estimate of employees' global levels of self-determined work motivation and an equally direct estimate of the unique quality associated with each specific regulation.

    “Recent studies conducted in the work (Fernet et al., 2020;Howard et al., 2018) and educational (Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017) areas have demonstrated that bifactor exploratory structural equation models (bifactor-ESEM; Morin, Arens, & Marsh, 2016) made it possible to simultaneously obtain a direct estimate of employees' global levels of self-determined work motivation and an equally direct”

    From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017

  • In these studies, participants' global levels of self-determination tended to be the key component responsible for associations with a variety of covariates.

    “These studies showed that participants' global levels of self-determination tended to be the key component responsible for associations with a variety of covariates, underscoring the importance of considering global levels of self-determination in future research on work motivation.”

    From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017

  • These studies also supported the additional value of considering the specific regulation factors in prediction.

    “However, they also supported the additional value of considering the specific regulation factors in prediction.”

    From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017

  • Prior investigations failed to explicitly take into account levels of global self-determination, which have been shown in previous variable-centered studies to represent a much stronger predictor of outcomes than specific motivation factors.

    “However, these prior investigations also failed to explicitly take into account the levels of global self-determination which have been shown, in previous variable-centered studies (Howard et al., 2018;Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017), to represent a much stronger predictor of outcomes than the specific motivation factors reflecting the unique quality of employees' work motivation beyond their”

    From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017

  • Recent research shows that levels of global self-determination reflecting the self-determination continuum can co-exist with types of motivation retaining meaningful specificity and explanatory power.

    “Recent research has shown that it was possible for SDT to “have its cake and eat it too” (Howard et al., 2018;Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017), showing that levels of global selfdetermination reflecting the self-determination continuum were able to co-exist with types of motivation retaining a meaningful level of specificity and explanatory power.”

    From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Gagné, M., Vallerand, R. J., Losier, G. F., & Ryan, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Moncton (CA)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Litalien, David
ORCID
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
51
Pages
67-82
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.010
OpenAlex
W2733060449
Cited by
163
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3
FWCI
21.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
academic self-determination, academic motivation, self-determination theory, bifactor ESEM, Academic Motivation Scale, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation, relative autonomy, student satisfaction, dropout intention, ill-being, vitality, undergraduate and graduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review