Cited by 1,758Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 209 of the 211 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alzheimer Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies

Open access

Abstract

There are still no effective treatments to prevent, halt, or reverse Alzheimer's disease, but research advances over the past three decades could change this gloomy picture. Genetic studies demonstrate that the disease has multiple causes. Interdisciplinary approaches combining biochemistry, molecular and cell biology, and transgenic modeling have revealed some of its molecular mechanisms. Progress in chemistry, radiology, and systems biology is beginning to provide useful biomarkers, and the emergence of personalized medicine is poised to transform pharmaceutical development and clinical trials. However, investigative and drug development efforts should be diversified to fully address the multifactoriality of the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.040

Cites

209 of 209 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 211 references

2 of the 211 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Verret, 2012, Key role of interneuronal impairments in Alzheimer's disease-related neural network and cognitive dysfunction, Cell, 149

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,007

Metadata

Authors
Huang, Y., & Mucke, L.
Affiliations
Gladstone Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Mucke, Lennart
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
148
Issue
6
Pages
1204-1222
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002181764
Cited by
1,758
References
211
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 168 · 2015: 143 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 127 · 2012: 39
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG011385, AG022074, P01AG022074)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, disease mechanisms, treatment options, genetic risk factors, transgenic animal models, biomarkers, personalized medicine, drug development, complex diseases
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cognition, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review