Cited by 568Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Ligands Illuminate GPCR Molecular Pharmacology

Open access

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are modulated by a variety of endogenous and synthetic ligands, represent the largest family of druggable targets in the human genome. Recent structural and molecular studies have both transformed and expanded classical concepts of receptor pharmacology and have begun to illuminate the distinct mechanisms by which structurally, chemically, and functionally diverse ligands modulate GPCR function. These molecular insights into ligand engagement and action have enabled new computational methods and accelerated the discovery of novel ligands and tool compounds, especially for understudied and orphan GPCRs. These advances promise to streamline the development of GPCR-targeted medications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.009

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 115 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wacker, D., Stevens, R. C., & Roth, B. L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Roth, Bryan L.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
170
Issue
3
Pages
414-427
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2741191097
Cited by
560
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 12
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institute of Health (RO1MH112205, UO1MH104974, U19MH82441, PO1DA035764)
  • Michael Hooker Distinguished Professorship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, GPCR pharmacology, ligand binding, ligand-receptor interactions, orphan G protein-coupled receptor, tool compounds, computational drug discovery, GPCR structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Signal Transduction, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review