Cited by 642Cancer Cells and MetastasisMathematical Biology Tumor GrowthStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Combination Cancer Therapy Can Confer Benefit via Patient-to-Patient Variability without Drug Additivity or Synergy

Open access
Palmer, Adam C., Sorger, Peter K.·2017·Cell

Abstract

Combination cancer therapies aim to improve the probability and magnitude of therapeutic responses and reduce the likelihood of acquired resistance in an individual patient. However, drugs are tested in clinical trials on genetically diverse patient populations. We show here that patient-to-patient variability and independent drug action are sufficient to explain the superiority of many FDA-approved drug combinations in the absence of drug synergy or additivity. This is also true for combinations tested in patient-derived tumor xenografts. In a combination exhibiting independent drug action, each patient benefits solely from the drug to which his or her tumor is most sensitive, with no added benefit from other drugs. Even when drug combinations exhibit additivity or synergy in pre-clinical models, patient-to-patient variability and low cross-resistance make independent action the dominant mechanism in clinical populations. This insight represents a different way to interpret trial data and a different way to design combination therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.009

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No relevant clinical activity has been observed in trials encompassing a variety of solid tumour types, including immunotherapy-sensitive tumours such as renal cell carcinoma and melanoma.

    “Notably, no relevant clinical activity has been observed in trials encompassing a variety of solid tumour types, including immunotherapy-sensitive tumours such as renal cell carcinoma63 and melanoma64.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gaddum JH 1940 Pharmacology 1 Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmer, A. C., & Sorger, P. K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Sorger, Peter K.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
171
Issue
7
Pages
1678-1691.e13
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774112395
Cited by
642
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NHMRC (1072965)
  • NIH (GM107618)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
combination cancer therapy, patient-to-patient variability, drug synergy, drug additivity, cross-resistance, acquired drug resistance, patient-derived xenografts, drug combination design, tumor sensitivity
MeSH terms
Biological Variation, Individual, Animals, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Interactions, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasm Transplantation, Neoplasms, Drug Delivery Systems, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Heterografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review