Cited by 470RNA Research and SplicingRNA regulation and diseaseCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Integrative Genome-wide Analysis Reveals Cooperative Regulation of Alternative Splicing by hnRNP Proteins

Open access
Huelga, Stephanie C., Vu, Anthony Q., Arnold, Justin D., Liang, Tiffany Y., Liu, Patrick P., Yan, Bernice Y., Donohue, John Paul, Shiue, Lily +4 more·2012·Cell Reports

Abstract

Understanding how RNA binding proteins control the splicing code is fundamental to human biology and disease. Here, we present a comprehensive study to elucidate how heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoparticle (hnRNP) proteins, among the most abundant RNA binding proteins, coordinate to regulate alternative pre-mRNA splicing (AS) in human cells. Using splicing-sensitive microarrays, crosslinking and immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (CLIP-seq), and cDNA sequencing, we find that more than half of all AS events are regulated by multiple hnRNP proteins and that some combinations of hnRNP proteins exhibit significant synergy, whereas others act antagonistically. Our analyses reveal position-dependent RNA splicing maps, in vivo consensus binding sites, a surprising level of cross- and autoregulation among hnRNP proteins, and the coordinated regulation by hnRNP proteins of dozens of other RNA binding proteins and genes associated with cancer. Our findings define an unprecedented degree of complexity and compensatory relationships among hnRNP proteins and their splicing targets that likely confer robustness to cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.001

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very different motifs have been previously described for different HNRNPA family members from human and Drosophila, whereas RNAcompete motifs for the same proteins are closely related.

    “very different motifs have been previously described for different HNRNPA family members from human and Drosophila19–22, whereas the RNAcompete motifs for the same proteins are closely related”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huelga, S. C., Vu, A. Q., Arnold, J. D., Liang, T. Y., Liu, P. P., Yan, B. Y., Donohue, J. P., Shiue, L., Hoon, S., Brenner, S., Ares, M., & Yeo, G. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Yeo, Gene W.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
167-178
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999609473
Cited by
470
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG004659, R01HG004659)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084317, GM084317)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS075449)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
alternative splicing, hnRNP proteins, RNA-binding proteins, splicing regulation, cooperative regulation, protein-protein interaction, consensus binding site, cross-regulation, autoregulation, cancer genes
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Exons, Fibroblasts, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Organ Specificity, Protein Binding, RNA Precursors, Blotting, Western, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Human, Alternative Splicing, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Protein Interaction Mapping, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins, Genes, Neoplasm, HEK293 Cells, Nucleotide Motifs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review