Cited by 141RNA Research and SplicingRNA regulation and diseaseRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Building Robust Transcriptomes with Master Splicing Factors

Open access
Jangi, Mohini, Sharp, Phillip A.·2014·Cell

Abstract

Coherent splicing networks arise from many discrete splicing decisions regulated in unison. Here, we examine the properties of robust, context-specific splicing networks. We propose that a subset of key splicing regulators, or "master splicing factors," respond to environmental cues to establish and maintain tissue transcriptomes during development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.054

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual splicing regulators affect coherent sets of transcripts that can be involved in common biological pathways.

    “These genome-wide analyses indicate that individual splicing regulators affect coherent sets of transcripts that can be involved in common biological pathways195,196.”

    From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [196]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jangi, M., & Sharp, P. A.
Affiliations
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Phillip A.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
487-498
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147842901
Cited by
141
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PMC
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P30-CA14051, R01-CA133404, RO1-GM34277, U54-CA112967)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
splicing, splicing regulators, tissue-specific transcriptome, developmental regulation, environmental cues, alternative splicing
MeSH terms
Animals, Feedback, Homeostasis, Humans, Organ Specificity, RNA Splicing, Transcription Factors, RNA-Binding Proteins, Alternative Splicing, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review