Cited by 337Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsSirtuins and Resveratrol in MedicineNuclear Receptors and Signaling

The NAD+ precursor nicotinamide riboside rescues mitochondrial defects and neuronal loss in iPSC and fly models of Parkinson's disease

Open access
Schöndorf, David C., Ivanyuk, Dina, Baden, Pascale, Sanchez-Martinez, Alvaro, De Cicco, Silvia, Yu, Cong, Giunta, Ivana, Schwarz, Lukas K. +10 more·2018·Cell Reports

Abstract

While mitochondrial dysfunction is emerging as key in Parkinson's disease (PD), a central question remains whether mitochondria are actual disease drivers and whether boosting mitochondrial biogenesis and function ameliorates pathology. We address these questions using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells and Drosophila models of GBA-related PD (GBA-PD), the most common PD genetic risk. Patient neurons display stress responses, mitochondrial demise, and changes in NAD+ metabolism. NAD+ precursors have been proposed to ameliorate age-related metabolic decline and disease. We report that increasing NAD+ via the NAD+ precursor nicotinamide riboside (NR) significantly ameliorates mitochondrial function in patient neurons. Human neurons require nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) to maintain the NAD+ pool and utilize NRK1 to synthesize NAD+ from NAD+ precursors. Remarkably, NR prevents the age-related dopaminergic neuronal loss and motor decline in fly models of GBA-PD. Our findings suggest NR as a viable clinical avenue for neuroprotection in PD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.009

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dopaminergic neurons derived from iPSCs expressing mutant GBA exhibit a reduced cytosolic NAD+/NADH ratio, although no significant change in total cellular NAD+ was seen.

    “Dopaminergic neurons derived from iPSCs expressing mutant GBA exhibit a reduced cytosolic NAD+/NADH ratio, although no significant change of total cellular NAD+ was seen (Schöndorf et al., 2018).”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Schöndorf et al., 2018

  • P7C3 was shown to be neuroprotective in mouse models of Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease and ALS.

    “P7C3 was shown to be neuroprotective in mouse models of Parkinson disease137, Alzheimer disease157 and ALS158.”
  • NAD+ depletion is reported in several models of accelerated ageing that exhibit neurodegeneration, as well as in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

    “NAD+ depletion is reported in several models of accelerated ageing which exhibit neurodegeneration33,134,135, as well as in neuro-degenerative diseases, including Alzheimer disease136, Parkinson disease137,138 and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)139.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schöndorf, D. C., Ivanyuk, D., Baden, P., Sanchez-Martinez, A., De Cicco, S., Yu, C., Giunta, I., Schwarz, L. K., Di Napoli, G., Panagiotakopoulou, V., Nestel, S., Keatinge, M., Pruszak, J., Bandmann, O., Heimrich, B., Gasser, T., Whitworth, A. J., & Deleidi, M.
Affiliations
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Deleidi, Michela
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
2976-2988
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805234895
Cited by
337
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 4
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Research Council (309742)
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE 2157/2-1)
  • Helmholtz Association (VH-NG-1123)
  • Marie Curie (CIG304108)
  • National Institutes of Health (C06 RR018823)
  • Medical Research Council (MC-A070-5PSB0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, nicotinamide riboside, NAD+ precursors, mitochondrial dysfunction, visfatin, dopaminergic neuron loss, neuroprotection, iPSC-derived neurons, Drosophila model, mitochondrial biogenesis, NAD+ metabolism
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila melanogaster, Glucosylceramidase, Humans, Mitochondria, Motor Activity, NAD, Neurons, Niacinamide, Parkinson Disease, Pyridinium Compounds, Unfolded Protein Response, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Dopaminergic Neurons, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, Mitochondrial Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review