Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supplementary cementitious materials: New sources, characterization, and performance insights

Juenger, Maria C.G., Snellings, Ruben, Bernal, Susan A.·2019·Cement and Concrete Research
DOI 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Conventional supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as blast furnace slags or fly ashes, have been used for many decades, and a large body of knowledge has been collected regarding their compositional make-up and their impacts on cement hydration and concrete properties. This accumulated empirical experience can provide a solid, confident base to go beyond the status quo and develop a new generation of low-clinker cements composed of new types and combinations of SCMs. The need for new sources of SCMs has never been greater, as supplies of traditional SCMs are becoming restricted, and the demand for SCMs to reduce CO2 emissions from concrete production is increasing. In this paper, recent research on emerging SCM sources is reviewed, along with new developments in characterizing and qualifying SCMs for use and improved knowledge of SCMs on long-term concrete performance and durability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 175

  1. Hossain, 2018, Evaluation of environmental impact distribution methods for supplementary cementitious materials, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.048 · DOI
  2. Miller, 2016, Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%, Environ. Res. Lett., 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074029 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kupwade-Patil, 2018, vol. 177, 547
  4. Miller, 2018, Supplementary cementitious materials to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from concrete: can there be too much of a good thing?, J. Clean. Prod., 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.008 · DOI
  5. Scrivener, 2018, Eco-efficient cements: potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry, Cem. Concr. Res., 114, 2, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Black, 2016, Is carbon dioxide pricing a driver in concrete mix design?, Mag. Concr. Res., 10.1680/jmacr.15.00018 · DOI
  7. Snellings, 2016, Rapid screening tests for supplementary cementitious materials: past and future, Mater. Struct., 10.1617/s11527-015-0718-z · DOI
  8. Kalina, 2019, False positives in ASTM C618 specifications for natural pozzolans, ACI Mater. J., 116, 165
  9. Dedeloudis, 2018, Natural pozzolans, 10.1007/978-3-319-70606-1_6 · DOI
  10. 2012, vol. 232
  11. Diaz-Loya, 2019, Extending supplementary cementitious material resources: reclaimed and remediated fly ash and natural pozzolans, Cem. Concr. Compos., 101, 44, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.06.011 · DOI
  12. Ghafari, 2016, Feasibility of using natural SCMs in concrete for infrastructure applications, Constr. Build. Mater., 127, 724, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.070 · DOI
  13. Seraj, 2017, The role of particle size on the performance of pumice as a supplementary cementitious material, Cem. Concr. Compos., 80, 135, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.009 · DOI
  14. Seraj, 2017, The role of particle size on the performance of pumice as a supplementary cementitious material, Cem. Concr. Compos., 80, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.009 · DOI
  15. Motahari Karein, 2018, Pretreatment of natural perlite powder by further milling to use as a supplementary cementitious material, Constr. Build. Mater., 186, 782, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.012 · DOI
  16. Páez-Flor, 2019, Microstructure-at-rest evolution and steady viscous flow behavior of fresh natural pozzolanic cement pastes, Constr. Build. Mater., 194, 360, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.009 · DOI
  17. Guynn, 2015, Maximizing SCM content of blended cements, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 51, 4824, 10.1109/TIA.2015.2455029 · DOI
  18. Seraj, 2016, Calcining natural zeolites to improve their effect on cementitious mixture workability, Cem. Concr. Res., 85, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.04.002 · DOI
  19. Burris, 2016, The effect of acid treatment on the reactivity of natural zeolites used as supplementary cementitious materials, Cem. Concr. Res., 79, 185, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.007 · DOI
  20. Burris, 2016, Milling as a pretreatment method for increasing the reactivity of natural zeolites for use as supplementary cementitious materials, Cem. Concr. Compos., 65, 163, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.09.008 · DOI
  21. Lv, 2019, Investigation on the potential utilization of zeolite as an internal curing agent for autogenous shrinkage mitigation and the effect of modification, Constr. Build. Mater., 198, 669, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.001 · DOI
  22. Hollanders, 2016, Pozzolanic reactivity of pure calcined clays, Appl. Clay Sci., 132–133, 552, 10.1016/j.clay.2016.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Taylor-Lange, 2015, Calcined kaolinite–bentonite clay blends as supplementary cementitious materials, Appl. Clay Sci., 1
  24. Danner, 2018, Characterisation of calcined raw clays suitable as supplementary cementitious materials, Appl. Clay Sci., 162, 391, 10.1016/j.clay.2018.06.030 · DOI
  25. Alujas, 2015, Pozzolanic reactivity of low grade kaolinitic clays: influence of calcination temperature and impact of calcination products on OPC hydration, Appl. Clay Sci., 108, 94, 10.1016/j.clay.2015.01.028 · DOI
  26. Schulze, 2019, Suitability of natural calcined clays as supplementary cementitious material, Cem. Concr. Compos., 95, 92, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.006 · DOI
  27. Almenares, 2017, Industrial calcination of kaolinitic clays to make reactive pozzolans, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 6, 225
  28. Snellings, 2016, Properties and pozzolanic reactivity of flash calcined dredging sediments, Appl. Clay Sci., 129, 35, 10.1016/j.clay.2016.04.019 · DOI
  29. Snellings, 2017, Flash-calcined dredging sediment blended cements: effect on cement hydration and properties, Mater. Struct., 50, 241, 10.1617/s11527-017-1108-5 · DOI
  30. Zhou, 2017, Sustainable infrastructure development through use of calcined excavated waste clay as a supplementary cementitious material, J. Clean. Prod., 168, 1180, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.098 · DOI
  31. Suraneni, 2018, Pozzolanicity of finely ground lightweight aggregates, Cem. Concr. Compos., 88, 115, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.01.005 · DOI
  32. Scrivener, 2018, Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3), Cem. Concr. Res., 1
  33. Dhandapani, 2018, Mechanical properties and durability performance of concretes with limestone calcined clay cement (LC3), Cem. Concr. Res., 107, 136, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Avet, 2018, Investigation of the calcined kaolinite content on the hydration of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3), Cem. Concr. Res., 107, 124, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.016 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lapeyre, 2018, Influence of pozzolanic additives on hydration mechanisms of tricalcium silicate, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 101, 3557, 10.1111/jace.15518 · DOI
  36. Zajac, 2018, Influence of calcium and magnesium carbonates on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of metakaolin containing composite cements, Cem. Concr. Res., 106, 91, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.008 · DOI
  37. Machner, 2018, Limitations of the hydrotalcite formation in Portland composite cement pastes containing dolomite and metakaolin, Cem. Concr. Res., 105, 1, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.11.007 · DOI
  38. Fernández, 2018, Ordinary Portland cement composition for the optimization of the synergies of supplementary cementitious materials of ternary binders in hydration processes, Cem. Concr. Compos., 89, 238, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.12.016 · DOI
  39. Vizcaino-Andres, 2015, Industrial trial to produce a low clinker, low carbon cement, Mater. Constr., 65, 10.3989/mc.2015.00614 · DOI
  40. Krishnan, 2015, High level clinker replacement in ternary limestone-calcined clay-clinker cement, Vol. 3
  41. Bentz, 2017, Limestone and silica powder replacements for cement: early-age performance, Cem. Concr. Compos., 78, 43, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kumar, 2017, The filler effect: the influence of filler content and type on the hydration rate of tricalcium silicate, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100, 3316, 10.1111/jace.14859 · DOI
  43. Schöler, 2017, Early hydration of SCM-blended Portland cements: a pore solution and isothermal calorimetry study, Cem. Concr. Res., 93, 71, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.013 · DOI
  44. Bentz, 2018, Towards the formulation of robust and sustainable cementitious binders for 3-D additive construction by extrusion, Constr. Build. Mater., 175, 215, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.167 · DOI
  45. De la Varga, 2018, Evaluating the hydration of high volume fly ash mixtures using chemically inert fillers, Constr. Build. Mater., 161, 221, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.132 · DOI
  46. Aughenbaugh, 2016, Identifying glass compositions in Fly ash, Front. Mater., 3, 10.3389/fmats.2016.00001 · DOI
  47. Schöler, 2017, The effect of glass composition on the reactivity of synthetic glasses, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100, 2253, 10.1111/jace.14759 · DOI
  48. Oey, 2017, Topological controls on the dissolution kinetics of glassy aluminosilicates, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100, 5521, 10.1111/jace.15122 · DOI
  49. Maraghechi, 2016, Effect of calcium on dissolution and precipitation reactions of amorphous silica at high alkalinity, Cem. Concr. Res., 87, 1, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.05.004 · DOI
  50. Newlands, 2017, Early stage dissolution characteristics of aluminosilicate glasses with blast furnace slag- and fly-ash-like compositions, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100, 1941, 10.1111/jace.14716 · DOI
  51. Paris, 2016, A review of waste products utilized as supplements to Portland cement in concrete, J. Clean. Prod., 121, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Aprianti, 2015, Supplementary cementitious materials origin from agricultural wastes - a review, Constr. Build. Mater., 74, 176, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.010 · DOI
  53. Rissanen, 2017, Partial replacement of Portland-composite cement by fluidized bed combustion fly ash, ASCE J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 29, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001899 · DOI
  54. Joseph, 2018, The use of municipal solidwaste incineration ash in various building materials: a Belgian point of view, Materials (Basel), 10.3390/ma11010141 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Kirsimäe, 2015, What shall we do with oil shale processing solid waste?, Oil Shale, 32, 201, 10.3176/oil.2015.3.01 · DOI
  56. Omran, 2018, Performance of ground-glass Pozzolan as a cementitious material - a review, Adv. Civ. Eng. Mater., 7, 237, 10.1520/ACEM20170125 · DOI
  57. Cordeiro, 2016, Improved pozzolanic activity of sugar cane bagasse ash by selective grinding and classification, Cem. Concr. Res., 89, 269, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.020 · DOI
  58. Cordeiro, 2017, Effect of mechanical processing on sugar cane bagasse ash pozzolanicity, Cem. Concr. Res., 97, 41, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.03.008 · DOI
  59. Bahurudeen, 2015, Influence of different processing methods on the pozzolanic performance of sugarcane bagasse ash, Cem. Concr. Compos., 56, 32, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.002 · DOI
  60. Al-Shmaisani, 2019, Evaluation of beneficiated and reclaimed fly ashes in concrete, ACI Mater. J., 10.14359/51716713 · DOI
  61. Zunino, 2018, Reducing setting time of blended cement paste containing high-SO3 fly ash (HSFA) using chemical/physical accelerators and by fly ash pre-washing, Cem. Concr. Compos., 90, 14, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.018 · DOI
  62. Wirth, 2019, Mineral phases and carbon content in weathered fly ashes, Fuel, 236, 1567, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.106 · DOI
  63. Han, 2015, Hydration heat evolution and kinetics of blended cement containing steel slag at different temperatures, Thermochim. Acta, 605, 43, 10.1016/j.tca.2015.02.018 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Hou, 2018, Material properties of steel slag-cement binding materials prepared by precarbonated steel slag, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 30, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002370 · DOI
  65. Liu, 2016, Effects of temperature and carbonation curing on the mechanical properties of steel slag-cement binding materials, Constr. Build. Mater., 124, 999, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.131 · DOI
  66. Mo, 2017, Accelerated carbonation and performance of concrete made with steel slag as binding materials and aggregates, Cem. Concr. Compos., 138, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.018 · DOI
  67. Shi, 2015, Preliminary investigation on the pozzolanic activity of superfine steel slag, Constr. Build. Mater., 82, 227, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.062 · DOI
  68. Qiang, 2016, Influence of classified steel slag with particle sizes smaller than 20 μm on the properties of cement and concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 123, 601, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.042 · DOI
  69. Jiang, 2018, Characteristics of steel slags and their use in cement and concrete—a review, Conserv. Recycl., 136, 187, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.023 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Kriskova, 2018, Transformation of stainless steel slag toward a reactive cementitious binder, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 101, 1727, 10.1111/jace.15306 · DOI
  71. Rahman, 2017, Soundness and compressive strength of Portland cement blended with ground granulated ferronickel slag, Constr. Build. Mater., 140, 194, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.023 · DOI
  72. Saha, 2018, Value added utilization of by-product electric furnace ferronickel slag as construction materials: a review, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134, 10, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.034 · DOI
  73. Edwin, 2016, Effect of secondary copper slag as cementitious material in ultra-high performance mortar, Constr. Build. Mater., 119, 31, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.007 · DOI
  74. Edwin, 2017, Influence of intensive vacuum mixing and heat treatment on compressive strength and microstructure of reactive powder concrete incorporating secondary copper slag as supplementary cementitious material, Constr. Build. Mater., 155, 400, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.036 · DOI
  75. Feng, 2019, Mechanical activation of granulated copper slag and its influence on hydration heat and compressive strength of blended cement, Materials (Basel), 12, 772, 10.3390/ma12050772 · DOI
  76. Peys, 2018, Molecular structure of CaO–FeOx–SiO2 glassy slags and resultant inorganic polymer binders, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 101, 5846, 10.1111/jace.15880 · DOI
  77. Arvaniti, 2015, Determination of particle size, surface area, and shape of supplementary cementitious materials by different techniques, Mater. Struct. Constr., 48, 10.1617/s11527-014-0431-3 · DOI
  78. Bernal, 2017, Characterization of supplementary cementitious materials by thermal analysis, Mater. Struct. Constr., 50, 10.1617/s11527-016-0909-2 · DOI
  79. Thomsen, 2018, The charge-balancing role of calcium and alkali ions in per-alkaline aluminosilicate glasses, J. Phys. Chem. B, 122, 3184, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b12437 · DOI
  80. Thomsen, 2017, Physical performances of alkali-activated Portland cement-glass-limestone blends, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100, 4159, 10.1111/jace.14955 · DOI
  81. Kinnunen, 2019, Phase separation in alumina-rich glasses to increase glass reactivity for low-CO2 alkali-activated cements, J. Clean. Prod., 213, 126, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.123 · DOI
  82. Garg, 2016, Pozzolanic reactivity of a calcined interstratified illite/smectite, Cem. Concr. Res., 79, 101, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.006 · DOI
  83. Brus, 2016, Advances in 27Al MAS NMR studies of geopolymers, Annu. Reports NMR Spectrosc., 88, 79, 10.1016/bs.arnmr.2015.11.001 · DOI
  84. M.T. Pedersen, F. Jensen, J. Skibsted, Structural investigation of Ye'elimite, Ca4Al6O12SO4, by 27Al MAS and MQMAS NMR at different magnetic fields, J. Phys. Chem. C 122 (2018) 12077–12089. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02497. · DOI
  85. Skibsted, 2017, Resolution of the two aluminum sites in ettringite by 27Al MAS and MQMAS NMR at very high magnetic field (22.3 T), J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 4011, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11875 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Gong, 2016, Impact of chemical variability of ground granulated blast-furnace slag on the phase formation in alkali-activated slag pastes, Cem. Concr. Res., 89, 310, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Natali, 2016, Elucidating the atomic structures of different sources of fly ash using X-ray and neutron PDF analysis, Fuel, 177, 148, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.017 · DOI
  88. Avet, 2018, Determination of the amount of reacted metakaolin in calcined clay blends, Cem. Concr. Res., 106, 40, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.009 · DOI
  89. Berodier, 2015, Evolution of pore structure in blended systems, Cem. Concr. Res., 72, 25, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.025 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Snellings, 2013, Solution-controlled dissolution of supplementary cementitious material glasses at pH 13: the effect of solution composition on glass dissolution rates, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 96, 2467, 10.1111/jace.12480 · DOI
  91. Durdziński, 2015, Fly ash as an assemblage of model Ca–Mg–Na-aluminosilicate glasses, Cem. Concr. Res., 78, 263, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.005 · DOI
  92. Snellings, 2015, Surface chemistry of calcium aluminosilicate glasses, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 98, 303, 10.1111/jace.13263 · DOI
  93. Suraneni, 2016, New insights into the hydration of slag in alkaline media using a micro-reactor approach, Cem. Concr. Res., 79, 209, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.09.015 · DOI
  94. Durdziński, 2015, A new quantification method based on SEM-EDS to assess fly ash composition and study the reaction of its individual components in hydrating cement paste, Cem. Concr. Res., 73, 111, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  95. Aboustait, 2016, Physical and chemical characteristics of fly ash using automated scanning electron microscopy, Constr. Build. Mater., 106, 1, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.098 · DOI
  96. Aughenbaugh, 2013, An examination of the reactivity of fly ash in cementitious pore solutions, Mater. Struct. Constr., 46, 10.1617/s11527-012-9939-6 · DOI
  97. Kim, 2018, Fly ash particle characterization for predicting concrete compressive strength, Constr. Build. Mater., 165, 560, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.059 · DOI
  98. Kocaba, 2012, Methods for determination of degree of reaction of slag in blended cement pastes, Cem. Concr. Res., 42, 511, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Shoji, 2018, Classification of volcanic ash particles using a convolutional neural network and probability, Sci. Rep., 8, 10.1038/s41598-018-26200-2 · DOI
  100. Rossen, 2017, Optimization of SEM-EDS to determine the C–A–S–H composition in matured cement paste samples, Mater. Charact., 123, 294, 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.041 · DOI
  101. Oey, 2017, Rate controls on silicate dissolution in cementitious environments, RILEM Tech. Lett., 2, 67, 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2017.35 · DOI
  102. Hu, 2016, Direct measurements of 3D structure, chemistry and mass density during the induction period of C3S hydration, Cem. Concr. Res., 89, 14, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.008 · DOI
  103. Geng, 2018, Synchrotron X-ray nanotomographic and spectromicroscopic study of the tricalcium aluminate hydration in the presence of gypsum, Cem. Concr. Res., 111, 130, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.002 · DOI
  104. Bullard, 2017, Measurement and modeling needs for microstructure and reactivity of next-generation concrete binders, Cem. Concr. Compos.
  105. Li, 2018, Reactivity tests for supplementary cementitious materials: RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 1, Mater. Struct., 51, 10.1617/s11527-018-1269-x · DOI
  106. McCarthy, 2017, Evaluation of fly ash reactivity potential using a lime consumption test, Mag. Concr. Res., 69, 954, 10.1680/jmacr.16.00505 · DOI
  107. Thorstensen, 2015, Inconsistencies in the pozzolanic strength activity index (SAI) for silica fume according to EN and ASTM, Mater. Struct., 48, 3979, 10.1617/s11527-014-0457-6 · DOI
  108. Avet, 2016, Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays, Cem. Concr. Res., 85, 1, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Suraneni, 2017, Examining the pozzolanicity of supplementary cementitious materials using isothermal calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis, Cem. Concr. Compos., 273, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  110. Snellings, 2019, A rapid, robust and relevant R3 reactivity test for supplementary cementitious materials, ACI Mater. J., 10.14359/51716719 · DOI
  111. De Weerdt, 2015, Impact of the associated cation on chloride binding of Portland cement paste, Cem. Concr. Res., 68, 196, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.01.027 · DOI
  112. Khan, 2016, Chloride binding capacity of hydrotalcite and the competition with carbonates in ground granulated blast furnace slag concrete, Mater. Struct., 49, 4609, 10.1617/s11527-016-0810-z · DOI
  113. Machner, 2018, Chloride-binding capacity of hydrotalcite in cement pastes containing dolomite and metakaolin, Cem. Concr. Res., 107, 163, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.002 · DOI
  114. Elahi, 2010, Mechanical and durability properties of high performance concretes containing supplementary cementitious materials, Constr. Build. Mater., 24, 292, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.045 · DOI · Paper page
  115. Sabir, 2001, Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review, Cem. Concr. Compos., 23, 441, 10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00092-5 · DOI
  116. Cai, 2016, Volcano-related materials in concretes: a comprehensive review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 7220, 10.1007/s11356-016-6161-z · DOI
  117. Ahmadi, 2010, Use of natural zeolite as a supplementary cementitious material, Cem. Concr. Compos., 32, 134, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  118. Boddy, 2001, Long-term testing of the chloride-penetration resistance of concrete containing high-reactivity metakaolin, Cem. Concr. Res., 31, 759, 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00492-6 · DOI
  119. Chan, 1999, Comparative study of the initial surface absorption and chloride diffusion of high performance zeolite, silica fume and PFA concretes, Cem. Concr. Compos., 21, 293, 10.1016/S0958-9465(99)00010-4 · DOI
  120. Rodrıguez-Camacho, 2002, Importance of using the natural pozzolans on concrete durability, Cem. Concr. Res., 32, 1851, 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00714-1 · DOI
  121. Lindgård, 2012, Alkali–silica reactions (ASR): literature review on parameters influencing laboratory performance testing, Cem. Concr. Res., 42, 223, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.10.004 · DOI
  122. Hossain, 2004, Properties of volcanic pumice based cement and lightweight concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 34, 283, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.004 · DOI
  123. Shafigh, 2014, Agricultural wastes as aggregate in concrete mixtures–a review, Constr. Build. Mater., 53, 110, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.074 · DOI
  124. De Weerdt, 2019, Effect of carbonation on the pore solution of mortar, Cem. Concr. Res., 118, 38, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  125. Khoshroo, 2018, Effect of chloride treatment curing condition on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete containing zeolite and micro-nano-bubble water, Constr. Build. Mater., 177, 417, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.086 · DOI
  126. Samimi, 2017, Influence of pumice and zeolite on compressive strength, transport properties and resistance to chloride penetration of high strength self-compacting concretes, Constr. Build. Mater., 151, 292, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.071 · DOI
  127. Markiv, 2016, Mechanical and durability properties of concretes incorporating natural zeolite, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 16, 554, 10.1016/j.acme.2016.03.013 · DOI
  128. Nagrockiene, 2016, Research into the properties of concrete modified with natural zeolite addition, Constr. Build. Mater., 113, 964, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.133 · DOI
  129. Vejmelková, 2015, Engineering properties of concrete containing natural zeolite as supplementary cementitious material: strength, toughness, durability, and hygrothermal performance, Cem. Concr. Compos., 55, 259, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.013 · DOI
  130. Samimi, 2018, Durability of self-compacting concrete containing pumice and zeolite against acid attack, carbonation and marine environment, Constr. Build. Mater., 165, 247, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.235 · DOI
  131. Kabay, 2015, Properties of concrete with pumice powder and fly ash as cement replacement materials, Constr. Build. Mater., 85, 1, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.026 · DOI
  132. Madani, 2018, The synergistic effect of pumice and silica fume on the durability and mechanical characteristics of eco-friendly concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 174, 356, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.070 · DOI
  133. Ulusu, 2016, Investigation on characteristics of blended cements containing pumice, Constr. Build. Mater., 118, 11, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.030 · DOI
  134. Fernandes, 2007, The effect of clay content in sands used for cementitious materials in developing countries, Cem. Concr. Res., 37, 751, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.016 · DOI
  135. Muñoz, 2010, Detection of aggregate clay coatings and impacts on concrete, ACI Mater. J., 107, 387
  136. Norhasri, 2017, Applications of using nano material in concrete: a review, Constr. Build. Mater., 133, 91, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.005 · DOI
  137. Langaroudi, 2018, Effect of nano-clay on workability, mechanical, and durability properties of self-consolidating concrete containing mineral admixtures, Constr. Build. Mater., 191, 619, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.044 · DOI
  138. Amar, 2018, Durability of a cementitious matrix based on treated sediments, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 8, 258
  139. Safer, 2018, Valorization of dredged sediments as a component of vibrated concrete: durability of these concretes against sulfuric acid attack, Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., 12, 10.1186/s40069-018-0270-7 · DOI
  140. Wang, 2018, A review on use of limestone powder in cement-based materials: mechanism, hydration and microstructures, Constr. Build. Mater., 181, 659, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.075 · DOI · Paper page
  141. Rahman, 2014, Thaumasite sulfate attack on concrete: mechanisms, influential factors and mitigation, Constr. Build. Mater., 73, 652, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.034 · DOI
  142. Barcelo, 2014, A modified ASTM C1012 procedure for qualifying blended cements containing limestone and SCMs for use in sulfate-rich environments, Cem. Concr. Res., 63, 75, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.05.007 · DOI
  143. Palm, 2016, Cements with a high limestone content–mechanical properties, durability and ecological characteristics of the concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 119, 308, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.009 · DOI
  144. Baldermann, 2018, Effect of very high limestone content and quality on the sulfate resistance of blended cements, Constr. Build. Mater., 188, 1065, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.169 · DOI
  145. Rezvani, 2019, Modelling the drying shrinkage of concrete made with limestone-rich cements, Cem. Concr. Res., 115, 160, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.003 · DOI
  146. Van Tittelboom, 2013, Test methods for resistance of concrete to sulfate attack–a critical review, 251
  147. Maraghechi, 2018, Performance of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) with various kaolinite contents with respect to chloride transport, Mater. Struct., 51, 10.1617/s11527-018-1255-3 · DOI · Paper page
  148. Shi, 2017, Friedel's salt profiles from thermogravimetric analysis and thermodynamic modelling of Portland cement-based mortars exposed to sodium chloride solution, Cem. Concr. Compos., 78, 73, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  149. Shi, 2017, Role of calcium on chloride binding in hydrated Portland cement–metakaolin–limestone blends, Cem. Concr. Res., 95, 205, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  150. Dhandapani, 2017, Assessment of pore structure evolution in the limestone calcined clay cementitious system and its implications for performance, Cem. Concr. Compos., 84, 36, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.012 · DOI
  151. Shi, 2019, Sulfate resistance of calcined clay–limestone–Portland cements, Cem. Concr. Res., 116, 238, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.003 · DOI
  152. Mirvalad, 2015, Minimum SCM requirements in mixtures containing limestone cement to control thaumasite sulfate attack, Constr. Build. Mater., 84, 19, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.074 · DOI
  153. Shi, 2016, Experimental studies and thermodynamic modeling of the carbonation of Portland cement, metakaolin and limestone mortars, Cem. Concr. Res., 88, 60, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  154. Shah, 2018, Carbonation resistance of cements containing supplementary cementitious materials and its relation to various parameters of concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.162 · DOI
  155. Machner, 2018, Stability of the hydrate phase assemblage in Portland composite cements containing dolomite and metakaolin after leaching, carbonation, and chloride exposure, Cem. Concr. Compos., 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.013 · DOI
  156. Adu-Amankwah, 2017, Influence of limestone on the hydration of ternary slag cements, Cem. Concr. Res., 100, 96, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.05.013 · DOI · Paper page
  157. Zajac, 2018, Impact of microstructure on the performance of composite cements: why higher total porosity can result in higher strength, Cem. Concr. Compos., 90, 178, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.023 · DOI
  158. Proske, 2018, Concretes made of efficient multi-composite cements with slag and limestone, Cem. Concr. Compos., 89, 107, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.012 · DOI
  159. Zhang, 2017, Evaluation of the combined deterioration by freeze–thaw and carbonation of mortar incorporating BFS, limestone powder and calcium sulfate, Mater. Struct., 50
  160. Adu-Amankwah, 2018, Relationship between cement composition and the freeze-thaw resistance of concretes, Adv. Cem. Res., 30, 387, 10.1680/jadcr.17.00138 · DOI
  161. Mo, 2016, Green concrete partially comprised of farming waste residues: a review, J. Clean. Prod., 117, 122, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.022 · DOI
  162. Martirena, 2018, Vegetable ashes as supplementary cementitious materials, Cem. Concr. Res., 114, 57, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.015 · DOI
  163. Bahurudeen, 2015, Performance evaluation of sugarcane bagasse ash blended cement in concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., 59, 77, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  164. Rajasekar, 2018, Durability characteristics of ultra high strength concrete with treated sugarcane bagasse ash, Constr. Build. Mater., 171, 350, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.140 · DOI
  165. Kazmi, 2017, Pozzolanic reaction of sugarcane bagasse ash and its role in controlling alkali silica reaction, Constr. Build. Mater., 148, 231, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.025 · DOI
  166. Czarnecki, 2018, Risk of concrete carbonation with mineral industrial by-products, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 22, 755, 10.1007/s12205-017-1623-5 · DOI
  167. Chandra Paul, 2018, A comprehensive review on mechanical and durability properties of cement-based materials containing waste recycled glass, J. Clean. Prod., 198, 891, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.095 · DOI
  168. Idir, 2011, Pozzolanic properties of fine and coarse color-mixed glass cullet, Cem. Concr. Compos., 33, 19, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.013 · DOI
  169. Leemann, 2015, Relation between carbonation resistance, mix design and exposure of mortar and concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., 62, 33, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.020 · DOI
  170. Leemann, 2017, Carbonation of concrete: the role of CO2 concentration, relative humidity and CO2 buffer capacity, Mater. Struct., 50, 10.1617/s11527-016-0917-2 · DOI · Paper page
  171. Kunther, 2015, Influence of the Ca/Si ratio of the C–S–H phase on the interaction with sulfate ions and its impact on the ettringite crystallization pressure, Cem. Concr. Res., 69, 37, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.12.002 · DOI
  172. G.M.R, 2019, Comparing chloride ingress from seawater and NaCl solution in Portland cement mortar, Cem. Concr. Res., 115, 80, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.014 · DOI
  173. Jensen, 2015, Use of a multi-species reactive transport model to simulate chloride ingress in mortar exposed to NaCl solution or sea-water, Comput. Mater. Sci., 105, 75, 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.023 · DOI
  174. Tran, 2018, Modelisation of chloride reactive transport in concrete including thermodynamic equilibrium, kinetic control and surface complexation, Cem. Concr. Res., 110, 70, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.007 · DOI
  175. Soive, 2018, The advantages of using a geochemical transport model including thermodynamic equilibrium, kinetic control and surface complexation to simulate the durability of concretes exposed to chlorides and sulphates, Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., 1

Cited by

See all 1,260

Metadata

Authors
Juenger, M. C. G., Snellings, R., & Bernal, S. A.
Venue
Cement and Concrete Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
122
Pages
257-273
ISSN
0008-8846 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008
OpenAlex
W2945966691
Cited by
1,260
References
3
Type
supplementary materials
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • Texas Department of Transportation (0-6717, 5-6717, 0-6966)
  • Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (30439691)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (ECF EP/R001642/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supplementary cementitious materials: New sources, characterization, and performance insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008
The paper
Juenger, M. C. G., Snellings, R., & Bernal, S. A. (2019). Supplementary cementitious materials: New sources, characterization, and performance insights. Cement and Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.