Cited by 183Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum many-body systems

Consciousness as a state of matter

Open access
Tegmark, Max·2015·Chaos, Solitons & Fractals

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chaos.2015.03.014

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The methodological separation of domains obeys practical criteria, including ranges of energy, that are founded on weak grounds.

    “This methodological separation of domains obeys practical criteria—including ranges of energy [24]—that are founded on weak grounds.”

    From The Free Energy Principle: Good Science and Questionable Philosophy in a Grand Unifying Theory (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section III.G (p. 14) examines whether minimizing interactions can divide the physical world into objects, and Appendix B (p. 35) mentions a measurable range of energies. Neither passage addresses a methodological separation of domains by energy ranges or says that such criteria rest on weak grounds. Searches for energy ranges and domain boundaries found no passage establishing the attributed point. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Fisher-Escolà paradox was formally noted by Tegmark [65] and later discussed by other researchers [66].

    “This paradox was formally noted by Tegmark [65] and later discussed by other researchers [66].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [17]G. t'Hooft, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 (1993). · arXiv
  2. [18]J. Schwindt, arXiv:1210.8447 [quant-ph] (2012). · arXiv
  3. [20]R. W. Hamming, The Bell System Technical Journal 24 , 2 (1950).
  4. [22]J. J. Hopfield, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79 , 2554 (1982).
  5. [33]W. H. Zurek, quant-ph/0111137 (2001). · arXiv
  6. [39]M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-ToClassical Transition (Berlin, Springer, 2007).
  7. [42]R. Omn` es, quant-ph/0106006 (2001). · arXiv
  8. [47]H. Gharibyan and M. Tegmark, arXiv:1309.7349 [quantph] (2013). · arXiv
  9. [51]R. Penrose, The Emperor's New Mind (Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 1989).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tegmark, M.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Tegmark, Max
Venue
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
76
Pages
238-270
ISSN
0960-0779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157985941
Cited by
183
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6
FWCI
20.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chaos Solitons & Fractals (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
NSF (AST-090884, AST-1105835)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
consciousness, states of matter, integrated information, quantum factoring, Hilbert space factorization, tensor decomposition, superoperators, emergence of consciousness, emergent time, error-correcting codes, quantum Darwinism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review