Cited by 148Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life

Shen, Cai-Xia, Liu, Ru-De, Wang, Dan·2013·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.004

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, C.-X., Liu, R.-D., & Wang, D.
Affiliations
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Ru-De
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
185-192
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029617419
Cited by
148
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
22.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Social Science Fund of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
children's internet use, self-determination theory, psychological need satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review