Cited by 159Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Parents’ phubbing and problematic mobile phone use: the roles of the parent-child relationship and children’s self-esteem

Hong, Wei, Liu, Ru-De, Ding, Yi, Oei, Tian Po, Zhen, Rui, Jiang, Shuyang·2019·Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

Abstract

An increasing number of mobile phone users check their phones at any time and place, even during in-person interactions. Such behaviors that interrupt social interactions have been described as phubbing. The present study focused on phubbing behaviors within the context of parent-child households and aimed to examine the associations among parents' phubbing, the parent-child relationship, children's self-esteem, and problematic mobile phone use (PMPU) by adolescents. The structural equation model results based on the data collected from 1,721 secondary students revealed that parents' phubbing was not only directly associated with children's PMPU but also indirectly associated with PMPU through the mediating roles of the parent-child relationship and children's self-esteem after gender and age were controlled. These findings suggest a possible underlying mechanism for the relationship between parents' phubbing and children's PMPU, and could thus inform interventions to prevent or decrease PMPU among adolescents. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2019.0179

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, W., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Oei, T. P., Zhen, R., & Jiang, S.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Fordham University (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Ru-De
Venue
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Published
2019-12-01
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
779-786
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2990299942
Cited by
159
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9
FWCI
23.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
phubbing, problematic mobile phone use, parent-child relationship, children's self-esteem, adolescents, parental smartphone use, social media use, mediation, high school students
MeSH terms
Cell Phone Use, Latent Class Analysis, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Self Concept, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review