Cited by 358Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPhysical Activity and Health

Media and technology use predicts ill-being among children, preteens and teenagers independent of the negative health impacts of exercise and eating habits

Open access
Rosen, L.D., Lim, A.F., Felt, J., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A., Lara-Ruiz, J.M., Mendoza, J.S., Rokkum, J.·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no screen time for children under the age of 2 and limited screen time for all children. However, no such guidelines have been proposed for preteens and teenagers. Further, research shows that children, preteens, and teenagers are using massive amounts of media and those with more screen time have been shown to have increased obesity, reduced physical activity, and decreased health. This study examined the impact of technology on four areas of ill-being-psychological issues, behavior problems, attention problems and physical health-among children (aged 4-8), preteens (9-12), and teenagers (13-18) by having 1030 parents complete an online, anonymous survey about their own and their child's behaviors. Measures included daily technology use, daily food consumption, daily exercise, and health. Hypothesis 1, which posited that unhealthy eating would predict impaired ill-being, was partially supported, particularly for children and preteens. Hypothesis 2, which posited that reduced physical activity would predict diminished health levels, was partially supported for preteens and supported for teenagers. Hypothesis 3, that increased daily technology use would predict ill-being after factoring out eating habits and physical activity, was supported. For children and preteens, total media consumption predicted illbeing while for preteens specific technology uses, including video gaming and electronic communication, predicted ill-being. For teenagers, nearly every type of technological activity predicted poor health. Practical implications were discussed in terms of setting limits and boundaries on technology use and encouraging healthy eating and physical activity at home and at school.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.036

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barnett TA O'Loughlin J Sabiston CM Karp I Bélanger M Van Hulst A 2010 Teens and screens: The influence of screen time on adiposity in adolescents American Journal of Epidemiology 172 3 255 262 20616201
  2. Boone JE Gordon-Larsen P Adair LS Popkin BM 2007 Screen time and physical activity during adolescence: longitudinal effects on obesity in young adulthood International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity 4 426 436 PMC1906831 17559668
  3. Casiano H Kinley DJ Katz LY Chartier MJ Sareen J 2012 Media use and health outcomes in adolescents: Findings from a nationally representative survey Journal of the Canadian Academy of Adolescent Psychiatry 21 4 296 301 PMC3490531 23133464
  4. National Center for Health Statistics 2012 Health, United States, 2011: With special features on socioeconomic status and health Hyattsville, MD U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2012 22812021
  5. Young KS 1998 Caught in the net: How to recognize Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery New York John Wiley & Sons

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Felt, J., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Lara-Ruiz, J. M., Mendoza, J. S., & Rokkum, J.
Affiliations
California State University, Dominguez Hills (US)
Corresponding author
Rosen, L.D.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
35
Pages
364-375
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143780983
Cited by
358
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4
FWCI
84.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (GM008683)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
screen time, media use, technology use, preadolescents, adolescents, mental illness, behavioral problems, attention deficits, physical health, dietary habits, physical activity, video gaming, digital communication, screen time guidelines, parent survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review