Cited by 220Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

Relationship between internet use and depression: Focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior

Banjanin, Nikolina, Banjanin, Nikola, Dimitrijevic, Ivan, Pantic, Igor·2015·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banjanin, N., Banjanin, N., Dimitrijevic, I., & Pantic, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • Zemun Hospital (RS)
Corresponding author
Pantic, Igor
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
43
Pages
308-312
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045947542
Cited by
215
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8
FWCI
29.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Serbian Ministry of Science and Education (175059 and 41027)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
internet addiction, depression, adolescents, social networking sites, Facebook friends, depressive symptoms, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review