Cited by 118Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Increase in time spent on social media is associated with modest increase in depression, conduct problems, and episodic heavy drinking

Brunborg, Geir Scott, Burdzovic Andreas, Jasmina·2019·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adolescent use of social media has been linked to a range of negative outcomes, but it is still unclear whether the associations are spurious. To address this issue, we examined if within-individual change in time spent on social media was associated with within-individual changes in depression, conduct problems, and episodic heavy drinking in a sample of adolescents using first-differencing models (FD-models). METHODS: A sample of 763 Norwegian adolescents (45.1% boys; mean age 15.22 years, standard deviation 1.44) completed two questionnaires 6-months apart. The associations between changes in time spent on social media and symptoms of depression, conduct problems, and frequency of episodic heavy drinking were estimated using FD-models, a statistical technique that effectively controls for all time-invariant individual factors. We also accounted for three time-variant putative confounders: frequency of sports practice, frequency of unsupervised leisure activities, and peer relationship problems. RESULTS: Increases in time spent on social media were associated with increases in symptoms of depression (b = 0.13 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.24], p = 0.038), increases in conduct problems (b = 0.07 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.10], p = 0.007), and increases in episodic heavy drinking (b = 0.10 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.15], p < 0.001), after adjusting for changes in the three hypothesized confounders. The effect-sizes for these relationships were, however, quite modest. CONCLUSION: Increased time spent on social media was modestly related to increases in depression, conduct problems, as well as frequency of episodic heavy drinking among adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.013

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunborg, G. S., & Burdzovic Andreas, J.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • Department of Alcohol Tobacco &amp; Drugs Norwegian Institute of Public Health Norway
Corresponding author
Brunborg, Geir Scott
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-26
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
201-209
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2955504934
Cited by
118
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
29.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social media use, adolescents, depression, conduct problems, episodic heavy drinking, within-person change, spurious association, sports practice, peer relationship problems
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Underage Drinking, Adolescent, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Norway, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Social Media, Binge Drinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review