The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Earlier studies, according to Abdullah and Ward [84,85], found that PE had a substantial impact on the PEOU and PU for e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Abdullah and Ward [85] reported a substantial and optimistic relationship between PE and PEOU for e-learning in eight out of eleven research studies.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Perceived enjoyment is essential in assessing the adoption of e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“The same is true between PE and PU, as is evident from eight out of eight studies (100%).”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553
(1985) · Cited by 6,185
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 146 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bhatiasevi, 2011, Acceptance of e-learning for users in higher education: an extension of the technology acceptance model, The Social Sciences, 6, 513
- Hsu, 2013, Vol. 3(4), 211
- Lin, 2010, Understanding college students' continuing intentions to use multimedia e-learning systems, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8, 488
- Shen, 2010, Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the interactive whiteboard technology environment, International Review on Computers and Software, 5, 200
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923
“The selection of external variables comprised subjective norms, computer self-e ffi cacy, and facilitating conditions — three of the most prominent predictors of PEU and PU (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Baydas & Goktas, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialEvaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350
“Based on the literature study conducted by Abdullah and Ward (2016), the five most used external factors by researchers and confirmed to have a relationship with TAM in the context of e-learning are self-efficacy, subjective norm, enjoyment, computer anxiety, and prior experience. According to the review study conduct…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCollege students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19
Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011 · Cited by 1,286
“The findings from this study confirm previous literature saying that students who are confident in applying a variety of self-regulated strategies are more likely to accomplish their academic tasks ( Abdullah & Ward, 2016 ; Alghamdi et al., 2020 ).”
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A. M., & Althunibat, A. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y · Cited by 1,210
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) also investigated factors influencing e-learning acceptance using TAM.”
BackgroundTechnology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12864 · Cited by 1,204
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdullah, F., & Ward, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abdullah, Fazil
- ORCID
- Ward, Rupert
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 238-256
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2214098284
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 46.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.hud.ac.uk
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, e-learning adoption, extended technology acceptance model, self-efficacy, subjective norms, enjoyment, computer anxiety, user experience, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, external factors, student acceptance of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
