The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Earlier studies, according to Abdullah and Ward [84,85], found that PE had a substantial impact on the PEOU and PU for e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Abdullah and Ward [85] reported a substantial and optimistic relationship between PE and PEOU for e-learning in eight out of eleven research studies.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Perceived enjoyment is essential in assessing the adoption of e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“The same is true between PE and PU, as is evident from eight out of eight studies (100%).”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553
(1985) · Cited by 6,185
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bhatiasevi, 2011, Acceptance of e-learning for users in higher education: an extension of the technology acceptance model, The Social Sciences, 6, 513
- Hsu, 2013, Vol. 3(4), 211
- Lin, 2010, Understanding college students' continuing intentions to use multimedia e-learning systems, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8, 488
- Shen, 2010, Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the interactive whiteboard technology environment, International Review on Computers and Software, 5, 200
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923
“The selection of external variables comprised subjective norms, computer self-e ffi cacy, and facilitating conditions — three of the most prominent predictors of PEU and PU (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Baydas & Goktas, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialEvaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350
“Based on the literature study conducted by Abdullah and Ward (2016), the five most used external factors by researchers and confirmed to have a relationship with TAM in the context of e-learning are self-efficacy, subjective norm, enjoyment, computer anxiety, and prior experience. According to the review study conduct…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCollege students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19
Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011 · Cited by 1,286
“The findings from this study confirm previous literature saying that students who are confident in applying a variety of self-regulated strategies are more likely to accomplish their academic tasks ( Abdullah & Ward, 2016 ; Alghamdi et al., 2020 ).”
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A. M., & Althunibat, A. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y · Cited by 1,210
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) also investigated factors influencing e-learning acceptance using TAM.”
BackgroundTechnology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12864 · Cited by 1,204
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028 · Cited by 1,178
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565 · Cited by 895
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 · Cited by 693
“Based on extensive literature review on extended TAM in the context of e-learning, and in accordance with the GETAMEL developed by Abdullah and Ward (2016) (shown in figure 2), this study proposed the following research hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: SE positively affects students' PEOU of the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAl-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3 · Cited by 637
“The importance of SE as a key determinant of PU and PEU in the educational field is well-established in the literature of technology adoption (Chahal & Rani, 2022; Abdullah et al., 2016 ).”
BackgroundPredicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach
Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Marinković, V., de Luna, I. R., & Kalinić, Z. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.015 · Cited by 554
Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption
Al-Saedi, K., Al‐Emran, M., Ramayah, T., & Abusham, E. E. A. A. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293 · Cited by 592
Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2939467 · Cited by 651
“Although Abdullah and Ward [24] achieved significant results by determining the most frequent factors affecting the e-learning adoption (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChang, C., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C.-R. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010 · Cited by 533
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, J. Y. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.006 · Cited by 382
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5 · Cited by 420
“The prior studies found that experience positively impacted users’ perceived ease of use toward e-learning usage (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Armenteros et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2017; De Smet et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2011; Tarhini et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialEducational Technology Adoption: A systematic review
Granić, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7 · Cited by 526
“…& Devedžić, 2021 ; Granić & Marangunić, 2019; Kemp, Palmer & Strelan, 2019; Scherer et al., 2019; Al-Emran, Mezhuyev & Kam-aludin, 2018; Abdullah & Ward,2016), while just few publications addressed other acceptance models and theories, in particular Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use…”
BackgroundAlmaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2957206 · Cited by 416
Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2019) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989 · Cited by 367
“Other studies have also confirmed the significant effect of perceived ease of use on perceived usefulness (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Alalwan et al., 2017; Baabdullah et al., 2016; Calisir & Calisir, 2004; Gefen & Straub, 2000; Susanto & Aljoza, 2015; Tobbin, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialRizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186468 · Cited by 318
“Following the GETAMEL [38], Enjoyment (ENJ) is understood as the extent to which the activity of applying any system is perceived to be enjoyable, regardless of the consequences of this system’s usage.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCan teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education?
Antonietti, C., Cattáneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266 · Cited by 551
Roh, M., & Park, K. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.017 · Cited by 320
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227 · Cited by 288
“Additionally, Abdullah and Ward (2016) completed a meta-analysis using the TAM to better understand the adoption of e-learning, or tools that utilize online technologies for instructional purposes.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialKimiagari, S., & Malafe, N. S. A. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102567 · Cited by 329
Shen, C.-W., & Ho, J.-T. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177 · Cited by 286
Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037 · Cited by 295
Güner, H., & Acartürk, C. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4 · Cited by 291
“However, external factors that influence perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use may change, such as social influence, anxiety, facilitating conditions, self-satis-faction, self-efficacy, cost tolerance, perceived enjoyment, experience and so on [1].”
BackgroundTsai, T.-H., Lin, W., Chang, Y., Chang, P., & Lee, M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227270 · Cited by 309
“However, it is also important to understand how external variables affect the PEOU and PU [26].”
BackgroundUsing virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extended technology acceptance model
Fussell, S. G., & Truong, D. (2021) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-021-00554-x · Cited by 307
“PENJ is another relatively new construct incorporated by Abdullah and Ward (2016) in the General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL).”
BackgroundInfluentialVanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M. C., & Hasan, H. F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2966179 · Cited by 313
“In addition, the easier it is to use the gamified training platform, the greater the user’s intentions to use gamification for training [43].”
BackgroundTsai, J.-M., Cheng, M.-J., Tsai, H.-H., Hung, S.-W., & Chen, Y.-L. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.003 · Cited by 257
Pânişoară, I. O., Lazăr, I., Pânişoară, G., Chirca, R., & Ursu, A. S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17218002 · Cited by 313
“Self-Determination Theory (SDT) involves self-efficacy, a similar concept to perceived competence [32] and one of the most used predictors of motivational models for e-learning [33].”
BackgroundCOVID-19 and Higher Education: First-Year Students’ Expectations toward Distance Learning
Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041889 · Cited by 243
“To fill this gap, Abdullah and Ward [47] developed the GETAMEL (General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning), where they elaborated on the external factors and distinguished the following indicators: Experience, Subjective Norms, Enjoyment, Computer Anxiety, and Self-Efficacy.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialGunasinghe, A., Hamid, J. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2019) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-05-2019-0020 · Cited by 233
Nagy, J. T. (2018) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886 · Cited by 287
Lai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y., & Chan, C. S. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178 · Cited by 310
A Technology Acceptance Model Survey of the Metaverse Prospects
Aburbeian, A. M., Owda, A. Y., & Owda, M. (2022) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai3020018 · Cited by 285
Kemp, A., Palmer, E., & Strelan, P. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12833 · Cited by 243
Jiang, H., Islam, A. Y. M. A., Gu, X., & Spector, J. M. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10519-x · Cited by 264
Ho, I. M. K., Cheong, K. Y., & Weldon, A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249423 · Cited by 262
“Apart from the aforementioned models, other technology acceptance and Elearning quality models have been developed with an emphasis on usefulness and ease of use [8, 35].”
BackgroundCultural impacts on e-learning systems' success
Aparício, M., Bação, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.003 · Cited by 213
“Education and e-learning have been the subject of several studies, e.g., modeling e-learning systems’ adoption (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Chen & Liu, 2013; Tarhini, Hone, Liu, & Tarhini, 2016), satisfaction (Aggelidis & Chatzoglou, 2012; Kassim, Jailani, Hairuddin, & Zamzuri, 2012), and success (Wang,…”
Virtual reality technology in construction safety training: Extended technology acceptance model
Zhang, M., Shu, L., Luo, X., Yuan, M.-Q., & Zheng, X.-Z. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104113 · Cited by 169
Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9 · Cited by 200
An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4 · Cited by 192
“TAM posits that the perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) of a technology are key determinants of its acceptance and use (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Davis, 1989).”
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13751 · Cited by 181
“Earlier studies, according to Abdullah and Ward [84,85], found that PE had a substantial impact on the PEOU and PU for e-learning.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialYALÇIN, M. E., & Kutlu, B. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12798 · Cited by 189
Sprenger, D. A., & Schwaninger, A. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00243-4 · Cited by 232
The Influence of Values on E-learning Adoption
Mehta, A., Morris, N. P., Swinnerton, B. J., & Homer, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617 · Cited by 214
Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study
Al‐Emran, M., & Teo, T. P. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10062-w · Cited by 185
“Under these conditions, e-learning scholars anticipated that more studies have to be carried out to understand the determinants that affect e-learning adoption (Abdullah and Ward 2016; Salloum et al. 2019).”
BackgroundLearning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review
Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al‐Emran, M. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10513-3 · Cited by 227
“These results are consistent partially with the results of previous meta-analyses conducted with the aim of discovering the most common external factors used to extend TAM in studies that examine e-learning adoption (Abdullah et al., 2016; Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundResultNi, A., & Cheung, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11305-z · Cited by 169
“Previous research has indicated that self-efficacy is an important antecedent of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, affecting individuals’ technology adoption behavior (Abdullah et al., 2016; Altalhi, 2021).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialChiu, W., & Cho, H. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2019-0534 · Cited by 172
An LLM-Driven Chatbot in Higher Education for Databases and Information Systems
Neumann, A. T., Yin, Y., Sowe, S. K., Decker, S., & Jarke, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2024.3467912 · Cited by 209
“Factors, such as SE, subjective norm, enjoyment, computer anxiety, and experience often shape students’ PEOU, and PU, particularly in e-learning contexts [80].”
Teo, T. P., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290 · Cited by 194
“To date, a wide range of factors have been reported in empirical research conducted under the framework of technology acceptance (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundMailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/9709 · Cited by 160
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) conducted a meta-analysis study and found that subjective norm, experience, perceived enjoyment, computer anxiety and self-efficacy were the most commonly used external factors for TAM.”
BackgroundZou, M., & Huang, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531 · Cited by 211
Gbongli, K., Xu, Y., & Amedjonekou, K. M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11133639 · Cited by 166
“TAM has also been applied and empirically supported in the prediction of the adoption of E-commerce [46], mobile marketing [54], mobile wallets [55], e-learning [56]; mobile banking [57], Big Data [58], business-related technologies [59] and much other information.”
MethodSayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137074 · Cited by 192
“CA is a phenomenon that has been widely researched since the start of the Digital Revolution in the 1980s and is still important today [50,51].”
BackgroundImpact of information and communication technology in Nigerian small-to medium-sized enterprises
Okundaye, K., Fan, S. K., & Dwyer, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science · doi:10.1108/jefas-08-2018-0086 · Cited by 145
Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.015 · Cited by 156
Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications
Jiménez, I. A. C., García, L. C. C., Violante, M. G., Marcolin, F., & Vezzetti, E. (2020) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13010007 · Cited by 177
“It is a common interest among academics who develop TAM extensions, to comprehend the relationships existing between external variables and TAM’s two main determinants PU and PEOU [6].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAmin, M. A., Arefin, M. S., Alam, M. R., Ahammad, T., & Hoque, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2021.1906817 · Cited by 159
“Subjective norms, behavioral intention, and continuance behavior Subjective norms (SN) refer to the extent to which people feel pressure from others (family, friends, and colleagues) of their community who are important to them to act in a certain way (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Ham et al., 2015).”
BackgroundImpact of Government Capacity and E-Government Performance on the Adoption of E-Government Services
Mensah, I. K. (2019) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1628059 · Cited by 194
“…model in fields such as e-government (Alryalat, 2017; Dahi & Ezziane, 2015; Ma & Zheng, 2018; Mensah, Vera, & Mi, 2018; Sebetci, 2015), e-learning (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Gamble, 2018; Mohammadi, 2015), e-health (Chauhan & Jaiswal, 2017; de Veer et al., 2015; Hoque, Bao, & Sorwar, 2017; Hossain,…”
Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424 · Cited by 140
“In the late 1990s, such educational courses came to be hosted on internal networks, and after that they were put on learning management systems (LMSs) in the late 1990s (Abdullah and Ward, 2016; Hubackova, 2015).”
BackgroundKim, E.-J., Kim, J. J., & Han, S.-H. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020896 · Cited by 182
“Yu and Yu [42] developed a theoretical framework based on TPB to investigate factors inducing student online learning utilization.”
BackgroundAguilera-Hermida, A. P., Quiroga-Garza, A., Gómez-Mendoza, S., Villanueva, C. A. D. R., Avolio, B., & Avcı, D. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10473-8 · Cited by 165
“The more experience users have, the easier the use of technology will be (Abdullah and Ward 2016; Davis 1989; Maldonado et al. 2009; Thongsri et al. 2018).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTechnological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training
Hsieh, J. C., Huang, Y., & Wu, W. V. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066 · Cited by 154
“Diverse theoretical models have been proposed to account for a user's fi nal acceptance behavior (Lee, Kozar, & Larsen, 2003) and TAM has been extended in numerous ways over the years (e.g., Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Mohammadi, 2015; Ros et al., 2015).”
BackgroundRezaei, R., Safa, L., & Ganjkhanloo, M. M. (2020) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00941 · Cited by 140
Application of innovation diffusion theory to the E-learning process: higher education context
Pinho, C. S. B., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10269-2 · Cited by 154
“In addition, the literature also reveals individuals are somewhat reluctant to accept and subsequently use this technology (Rym et al. 2013; Abdullah and Ward 2016).”
Backgroundİbi̇li̇, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z · Cited by 158
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) reported on seven studies that investigated the effects of losing perceived usefulness, and two of these studies found that ANX had a significant effect on PU, but not others.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKumar, J. A., Bervell, B., Annamalai, N., & Osman, S. B. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3037925 · Cited by 153
“Conversely, use perception which may be resulting from the effortless use of mobile learning, could also be attributed from having high mobile learning self-efficacy [46], [78], [83].”
BackgroundResultHumida, T., Al Mamun, M. H., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9 · Cited by 133
“Abdullah et al. discovered Self-Efficacy (SE) as the most usual external factor used in the TAM model (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Keikhosrokiani, 2019; Keikhosrokiani et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDo cultural differences affect users’ e‐learning adoption? A meta‐analysis
Zhao, Y., Wang, N., Li, Y., Zhou, R., & Li, S. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13002 · Cited by 151
Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning in Indonesia: Lesson from Covid-19
Siron, Y., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.1025 · Cited by 153
“In the e-learning context, Abdullah and Ward (2016) pointed out that factor enjoyment has positive influences on perceived ease to use and perceived usefulness.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHaghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083 · Cited by 130
“Abdullah and Ward’s (2016) study revealed that self-efficacy, subjective norm, enjoyment, computer anxiety, and experience were the most frequently used external factors affecting perceived usefulness and the perceived ease of use.”
BackgroundLazăr, I., Pânişoară, G., & Pânişoară, I. O. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235957 · Cited by 149
“The research on computer anxiety is a concept that has been largely studied after the beginning of the Digital Revolution in the 1980s and is still applicable nowadays [37, 49, 50].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHsu, H., & Lin, C. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13165 · Cited by 161
Won, D., Chiu, W., & Byun, H. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2021-0709 · Cited by 163
Ünal, E., & Uzun, A. M. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13046 · Cited by 159
Hong, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691492 · Cited by 174
“Similarly, computer self-efficacy and perception of external control play a positive effect upon the perceived ease of use (Abdullah and Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundTarhini, A., Elyas, T., Akour, M. A., & Al-Salti, Z. S. (2016) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v6n3p72 · Cited by 123
“Strong evidence supported the important role that PEU play in predicting the BI (Davis, 1989; Igbaria et al., 1997; Tarhini, Hone, & Liu, 2014a; Masa’deh et al., 2015; Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Esterhuyse & Scholtz, 2016).”
BackgroundWhat drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model
Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612 · Cited by 132
Chen, D., Liu, W., & Liu, X. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104442 · Cited by 173
Hanham, J., Lee, C. B., & Teo, T. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104252 · Cited by 141
Student continuance of learning management system use: A longitudinal exploration
Cheng, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.004 · Cited by 140
Huang, F., Teo, T. P., & Scherer, R. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1710540 · Cited by 138
Ghazal, S., Al‐Samarraie, H., & Aldowah, H. A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2879677 · Cited by 140
“[49], Abdullah and Ward [183],”
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Almusharraf, A. M. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1 · Cited by 157
“Previous studies utilized the TAM to examine factors related but not limited to experience, perceived usefulness, technology anxiety, and technology self-efficacy (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Chang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodRosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02996-1 · Cited by 153
“This step could improve students’ PEU because improvements will be made based on their input (Abdullah et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUnderstanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory
Hsu, G. J. Y., Chen, C., & Ting, P.-F. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1446990 · Cited by 115
“Therefore, our proposed model is in line with Davis (1986), Davis et al. (1989), Venkatesh and Morris (2000), Moon and Kim (2001), Chen et al. (2012), and Abdullah and Ward (2016) who suggested the TAM has the robust and well explanation for behavior intention toward the information system.”
BackgroundResultSitar‐Tăut, D., & Mican, D. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-01-2021-0017 · Cited by 136
Alkhawaja, M. I., Halim, M. S. A., Abumandil, M. S. S., & Al‐Adwan, A. S. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/11525 · Cited by 145
“In the context of the information system, the D&M model and TAM are the most popular models used to explain the adoption and success of information systems in education (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Almaiah, 2018; Almaiah et al., 2016, 2020).”
MethodZhai, N., & Ma, X. (2021) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019 · Cited by 113
“The result does not concur with previous studies (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Aburub & Alnawas, 2019; Li et al., 2019), where computer anxiety was found to have a negative relationship with perceived ease of use.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAll the same or different? Revisiting measures of teachers' technology acceptance
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103656 · Cited by 133
Sitar‐Tăut, D. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.261 · Cited by 119
“Sometimes its complexity is disapproved due to the confusing nature of some items and to the low impact on the overall performance of the outputs compared to UTAUT (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
Factors Influencing Intention to Technological Use in Older Adults. The TAM Model Aplication
Martín‐García, A. V., Redolat, R., & Hernandis, S. P. (2021) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/01640275211063797 · Cited by 127
“…in the literature, several recent reviews suggest that there is neither a unique formulation of these models for each type of technological use, nor a consensus on the importance of the main constructs that they propose (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Grani´c & Maranguni´c, 2019; Scherer et al., 2019).”
BackgroundFathali, S., & Okada, T. (2018) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.3629 · Cited by 118
“In a review of 107 studies that added external variables to the basic TAM and proposed new models, Abdullah and Ward (2016) found five excessively and commonly used variables for the extension – self-efficacy, subjective norm, perceived enjoyment, computer anxiety, and computer use experience.”
BackgroundChou, C.-M., Shen, C.-H., Hsiao, H.-C., & Shen, T.-C. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1520201 · Cited by 109
“It is clear that, compared with the acceptance of technological innovation, organizations ’ innovation climate is significantly and positively related to innovative teaching using ICT (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Lau & Yuen, 2014; Obiri-Yeboah, Kwarteng, & Kyere-Djan, 2013; Wang et al., 2014).”
BackgroundFROM PHYSICAL TO DIGITAL: INVESTIGATING CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR OF SWITCHING TO MOBILE WALLET
Alaeddin, O., Altounjy, R., Zainudin, Z., & Kamarudin, F. (2018) · Polish Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.02 · Cited by 122
“…study the players acceptance of social network games (Park et al., 2014), adoption of mobile cloud service (Park and Kim, 2014) and huge number of researches have been adopted TAM for e-learning acceptance (Abdullah and Ward, 2016; Chang et al., 2017; Ratna and Mehra, 2015; Tarhini et al., 2017).”
BackgroundYao, Y., Wang, P., Jiang, Y., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252 · Cited by 119
“…model proved appropriate, though studies have found no signi fi cant psychological differences in student satisfaction and acceptance of online learning, research tables clarify that TAM is affected by factors such as self-ef fi - cacy, enjoyment behaviors, and anxiety (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
ResultUrsavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır-Yalçın, E. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12834 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdullah, F., & Ward, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abdullah, Fazil
- ORCID
- Ward, Rupert
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 238-256
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2214098284
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 46.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.hud.ac.uk
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, e-learning adoption, extended technology acceptance model, self-efficacy, subjective norms, enjoyment, computer anxiety, user experience, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, external factors, student acceptance of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review